I read the article on Liberty County Chief Magistrate's opinion as to her unopposed re-election. One would think the bias comment on the reasoning (good job performance) would be stated as 'Truth' only if she actually won opposed. Her comment would be in comparison to the (opposed) Sheriff's campaign stating his "Proven Record". If "Proven Record" was 'Truth' why would you need a costly campaign commercial? Neither has logic, it's more likely the poor public politics has caught up with one and not 'YET' the other. This leads me to a question, after the election who would be appointed to the Magistrate position(s) if that office comes under investigation?
Blog has been viewed (93) times.