[Report Abuse]
[Login to Blog] timeontarget's Blog
Trump: Prisoner of the war Party?
Last comment by wood17 1 month ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

Trump: Prisoner of the War Party?
By Patrick J. Buchanan
Tuesday - April 17, 2018

"Ten days ago, President Trump was saying 'the United States should withdraw from Syria.' We convinced him it was necessary to stay."

Thus boasted French President Emmanuel Macron Saturday, adding, "We convinced him it was necessary to stay for the long term."

Is the U.S. indeed in the Syrian civil war "for the long term"?

If so, who made that fateful decision for this republic?

U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley confirmed Sunday there would be no drawdown of the 2,000 U.S. troops in Syria, until three objectives were reached. We must fully defeat ISIS, ensure chemical weapons would not again be used by Bashar Assad and maintain the ability to watch Iran.

Translation: Whatever Trump says, America is not coming out of Syria. We are going deeper in. Trump's commitment to extricate us from these bankrupting and blood-soaked Middle East wars and to seek a new rapprochement with Russia is "inoperative."

The War Party that Trump routed in the primaries is capturing and crafting his foreign policy. Monday's Wall Street Journal editorial page fairly blossomed with war plans:

"The better U.S. strategy is to ... turn Syria into the Ayatollah's Vietnam. Only when Russia and Iran began to pay a larger price in Syria will they have any incentive to negotiate an end to the war or even contemplate a peace based on dividing the country into ethnic-based enclaves."

Apparently, we are to bleed Syria, Russia, Hezbollah and Iran until they cannot stand the pain and submit to subdividing Syria the way we want.

But suppose that, as in our Civil War of 1861-1865, the Spanish Civil War of 1936-1939, and the Chinese Civil War of 1945-1949, Assad and his Russian, Iranian and Shiite militia allies go all out to win and reunite the nation.

Suppose they choose to fight to consolidate the victory they have won after seven years of civil war. Where do we find the troops to take back the territory our rebels lost? Or do we just bomb mercilessly?

The British and French say they will back us in future attacks if chemical weapons are used, but they are not plunging into Syria.

Defense Secretary James Mattis called the U.S.-British-French attack a "one-shot" deal. British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson appears to agree: "The rest of the Syrian war must proceed as it will."

The Journal's op-ed page Monday was turned over to former U.S. ambassador to Syria Ryan Crocker and Brookings Institute senior fellow Michael O'Hanlon: "Next time the U.S. could up the ante, going after military command and control, political leadership, and perhaps even Assad himself. The U.S. could also pledge to take out much of his air force. Targets within Iran should not be off limits."

And when did Congress authorize U.S. acts of war against Syria, its air force or political leadership? When did Congress authorize the killing of the president of Syria whose country has not attacked us?

Can the U.S. also attack Iran and kill the ayatollah without consulting Congress?

Clearly, with the U.S. fighting in six countries, Commander in Chief Trump does not want any new wars, or to widen any existing wars in the Middle East. But he is being pushed into becoming a war president to advance the agenda of foreign policy elites who, almost to a man, opposed his election.

We have a reluctant president being pushed into a war he does not want to fight. This is a formula for a strategic disaster not unlike Vietnam or George W. Bush's war to strip Iraq of nonexistent WMD.

The assumption of the War Party seems to be that if we launch larger and more lethal strikes in Syria, inflicting casualties on Russians, Iranians, Hezbollah and the Syrian army, they will yield to our demands.

But where is the evidence for this?

What reason is there to believe these forces will surrender what they have paid in blood to win? And if they choose to fight and widen the war to the larger Middle East, are we prepared for that?

As for Trump's statement Friday, "No amount of American blood and treasure can produce lasting peace in the Middle East," the Washington Post Sunday dismissed this as "fatalistic" and "misguided."

We have a vital interest, says the Post, in preventing Iran from establishing a "land corridor" across Syria.

Yet consider how Iran acquired this "land corridor."

The Shiites in 1979 overthrew a shah our CIA installed in 1953.

The Shiites control Iraq because President Bush invaded and overthrew Saddam and his Sunni Baath Party, disbanded his Sunni-led army, and let the Shiite majority take control of the country.

The Shiites are dominant in Lebanon because they rose up and ran out the Israelis, who invaded in 1982 to run out the PLO.

How many American dead will it take to reverse this history?

How long will we have to stay in the Middle East to assure the permanent hegemony of Sunni over Shiite?

Read More At: http://buchanan.org/blog/trump-prisoner-of-the-war-party-129140

Latest Activity: Apr 17, 2018 at 5:36 AM

Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by timeontarget
Send timeontarget a Message
Report Abuse

Blog has been viewed (186) times.

wood17 commented on Tuesday, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:04 AM

The Jordanians and the Saudi are our only hope for real stability in the middle east. The new Saudi Prince, for now seems to be making strides in modernizing the country and working with the Americans. The Iranians have built trafficking networks in Syria. They have done so with a complicit and helpful Russia and approval of North Korea. Syrian air defenses are Russian. Syria for it's part is fighting ISIS. We think. We cannot and should not have to invest the resources in an around Syria to insure stability in the region. We see how trillions of dollars have worked out in Iraq. How about Egypt and Turkey? Not long ago we were selling dozens of Gulfstream jets to these countries among other things. We were at least enjoying some stability from them. Along came Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. The "Arab Spring" was an unmitigated disaster. The Libyan debacle, as well as others, led to a huge refugee crisis. The movement create a vacuum for extremist militant groups. The uprising of groups like Isis was facilitated. The "JV Team" as President Obama called them.

In short, our options are not good. A lack of American leadership for some time has not helped the situation. If genuine, President Trump's first impression was a good one. We don't need a long term occupational status in Syria. We do need help from the relative powers in the Middle East. Egypt, Turkey, and Jordan triangulate this region. They are the natural strategic and regional facilitators of peace. Afghanistan to the east can be crucial if we can finally manage to create enough stability there. Our valuable men and women of the armed forces have endured enough in those mountains.

These comments are my opinion. I am not an expert on Middle Eastern affairs. I do welcome the discussion especially if folks have a differing perspective.

Funkentelecky commented on Tuesday, Apr 17, 2018 at 15:38 PM

I agree with you Wood however as a retired veteran of 21 years I just hope the president and his administration can indeed influence the region to take on its own responsibility before leaving. Don’t do like Obama who is bought and paid for by the Deepstate and leave before the region is stabilized. Obama left Iraq on a Deepstate campaign promise against the will and good faith advice of his generals. Even Crillary advised him not to leave and he did any “Deepstate”. This opened the door for Isil to take over and the JV team moniker. We all know he set a red line in Syria that he didn’t enforce and left all this mess for Trump to clean up the mess.

Funkentelecky commented on Tuesday, Apr 17, 2018 at 15:42 PM

I wonder if president Trump would like how I combined Crooked Hillary. “Crillary” What do you think?

Funkentelecky commented on Tuesday, Apr 17, 2018 at 18:42 PM

The generals told Obama to leave 10,000-23,000 troops in Iraq to keep it stabilized. Obama offered 3000 and blew away the SOFA that Bush left in place for his predecessor through 12/31/2011. There are now over 8900 troops in Iraq right now. Obama wasted my brothers in arms blood in vain when he gave away the country to ISIS and the fake news media didn’t hold him accountable for it. Obama gets a pass because he’s a progressive democrat that’s half block.

wood17 commented on Wednesday, Apr 18, 2018 at 22:40 PM

We lost a lot of the hard fought gains we secured in Iraq. We can thank Obama for that. Thank you mentioning it.

Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by timeontarget
Buchanan/Authoritarian Right Rising
April 20, 2018
Why the Authoritarian Right Is Rising By Patrick J. Buchanan Friday - April 20, 2018 A fortnight ago, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz Party won enough seats in the Hungarian parliament to rewrite his country's constitution. To progressives across the West, this was disturbing news. For the bete noire of ...
Read More »
Ann Coulter/Thoughts on Comey
April 19, 2018
ONE PERCENT CHANCE COMEY NOT A SELF-DRAMATIZING FRUITCAKE April 18, 2018 There have been a lot of questions about why Trump fired James Comey, ever since he announced to NBC's Lester Holt -- incomprehensibly -- that it was his decision, citing, by my count, at least a half-dozen different reasons. ...
Read More »
Why We Need the Electoral College
April 18, 2018
In their infinite wisdom, the United States’ Founders created the Electoral College to ensure the STATES were fairly represented. Why should one or two densely populated areas speak for the whole of the nation? The following list of statistics has been making the rounds on the Internet. It should finally ...
Read More »
Buchanan More on Syria
April 14, 2018
Friday - April 13, 2018 Wednesday morning, President Trump jolted the nation with a tweet that contained both threat and taunt: "Russia vows to shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria. Get ready Russia, because they will be coming, nice and new and 'smart!' You shouldn't be partners ...
Read More »
Syrian Showdown/Trump vs. the Generals
April 07, 2018
Syrian Showdown: Trump vs. the Generals Friday - April 6, 2018 at 1:16 am Share Pat's Columns! By Patrick J. Buchanan With ISIS on the run in Syria, President Trump this week declared that he intends to make good on his promise to bring the troops home. “I want to ...
Read More »
[View More Blogs...]

Powered by
Morris Technology