[Report Abuse]
[Login to Blog] timeontarget's Blog
Last comment by timeontarget 2 months, 3 weeks ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

Did the FBI Conspire to Stop Trump?
By Patrick J. Buchanan

Tuesday - December 26, 2017

The original question the FBI investigation of the Trump campaign was to answer was a simple one: Did he do it?

Did Trump, or officials with his knowledge, collude with Vladimir Putin's Russia to hack the emails of John Podesta and the DNC, and leak the contents to damage Hillary Clinton and elect Donald Trump?

A year and a half into the investigation, and, still, no "collusion" has been found. Yet the investigation goes on, at the demand of the never-Trump media and Beltway establishment.

Hence, and understandably, suspicions have arisen.

Are the investigators after the truth, or are they after Trump?

Set aside the Trump-Putin conspiracy theory momentarily, and consider a rival explanation for what is going down here:

That, from the outset, Director James Comey and an FBI camarilla were determined to stop Trump and elect Hillary Clinton. Having failed, they conspired to break Trump's presidency, overturn his mandate and bring him down.

Essential to any such project was first to block any indictment of Hillary for transmitting national security secrets over her private email server. That first objective was achieved 18 months ago.

On July 5, 2016, Comey stepped before a stunned press corps to declare that, given the evidence gathered by the FBI, "no reasonable prosecutor" would indict Clinton. Therefore, that was the course he, Comey, was recommending.

Attorney General Loretta Lynch, compromised by her infamous 35-minute tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton — to discuss golf and grandkids — seconded Comey's decision.

And so Hillary walked. Why is this suspicious?

First, whether or not to indict was a decision that belonged to the Department of Justice, not Jim Comey or the FBI. His preemption of Justice Department authority was astonishing.

Second, while Comey said in his statement that Hillary had been "extremely careless" with security secrets, in his first draft, Clinton was declared guilty of "gross negligence" — the precise language in the statute to justify indictment.

Who talked Comey into softening the language to look less than criminal? One man was FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, whose wife, Jill, a Virginia state senate candidate, received a munificent PAC contribution of $474,000 from Clinton family friend and big bundler Terry McAuliffe.

Also urging Comey to soften the fatal phrase "gross negligence" was key FBI agent Peter Strzok. In text messages to his FBI lover Lisa Page, Strzok repeatedly vented his detestation of the "idiot" Trump.

After one meeting with "Andy" (McCabe), Strzok told Page an "insurance policy" was needed to keep Trump out of the White House.

Also, it appears Comey began drafting his exoneration statement of Hillary before the FBI had even interviewed her. And when the FBI did, Hillary was permitted to have her lawyers present.

One need not be a conspiracy nut to conclude the fix was in, and a pass for Hillary wired from the get-go. Comey, McCabe, Strzok were not going to recommend an indictment that would blow Hillary out of the water and let the Trump Tower crowd waltz into the White House.

Yet, if Special Counsel Robert Mueller cannot find any Trump collusion with the Kremlin to tilt the outcome of the 2016 election, his investigators might have another look at the Clinton campaign.

For there a Russian connection has been established.

Kremlin agents fabricated, faked, forged, or found the dirt on Trump that was passed to ex-British MI6 spy Christopher Steele, and wound up in his "dirty dossier" that was distributed to the mainstream media and the FBI to torpedo Trump.

And who hired Steele to tie Trump to Russia?

Fusion GPS, the oppo research outfit into which the DNC and Clinton campaign pumped millions through law firm Perkins Coie.

Let's review the bidding.

The "dirty dossier," a mixture of fabrications, falsehoods and half-truths, created to destroy Trump and make Hillary president, was the product of a British spy's collusion with Kremlin agents.

In Dec. 26's Washington Times, Rowan Scarborough writes that the FBI relied on this Kremlin-Steele dossier of allegations and lies to base their decision "to open a counterintelligence investigation (of Trump)." And press reports "cite the document's disinformation in requests for court-approved wiretaps."

If this is true, a critical questions arises:

Has the Mueller probe been so contaminated by anti-Trump bias and reliance on Kremlin fabrications that any indictment it brings will be suspect in the eyes of the American people?

Director Comey has been fired. FBI No. 2 McCabe is now being retired under a cloud. Mueller's top FBI investigator, Peter Strzok, and lover Lisa, have been discharged. And Mueller is left to rely upon a passel of prosecutors whose common denominator appears to be that they loathe Trump and made contributions to Hillary.

Attorney General Bobby Kennedy had his "Get Hoffa Squad" to take down Teamsters boss Jimmy Hoffa. J. Edgar Hoover had his vendetta against Dr. Martin Luther King.

Is history repeating itself — with the designated target of an elite FBI cabal being the President of the United States?

Read More At: http://buchanan.org/blog/fbi-conspire-stop-trump-128359

Latest Activity: Dec 27, 2017 at 7:11 AM

Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by timeontarget
Send timeontarget a Message
Report Abuse

Blog has been viewed (267) times.

wayne44 commented on Wednesday, Dec 27, 2017 at 14:06 PM

All of it was being done before the election to help Clinton. After she lost, it has now become the goal of destroying the Trump presidency thereby denying the will of those who voted for him. You can not get any sleazier than ABC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, Newsweek, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the FBI leadership, and the hold-overs from the Obama administration.

timeontarget commented on Wednesday, Dec 27, 2017 at 16:40 PM

You are so very correct.

Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by timeontarget
Globalists & Nationalists: Who Owns the Future?
March 13, 2018
Globalists & Nationalists: Who Owns the Future? By Patrick J. Buchanan Tuesday - March 13, 2018 Robert Bartley, the late editorial page editor of The Wall Street Journal, was a free trade zealot who for decades championed a five-word amendment to the Constitution: "There shall be open borders." Bartley accepted ...
Read More »
Cal Thomas/Trump going like none before
March 11, 2018
Boldly going like no president before By Cal Thomas Published March 1,2018 Of all the promises candidate Donald Trump made during the 2016 presidential campaign, none will be more difficult to fulfill than cutting the size and cost of the federal government. That's because Congress, which must decide whether to ...
Read More »
Two good stories
March 10, 2018
Fw: Two good stories-(and both true). . . STORY NUMBER ONE Many Years ago, Al Capone virtually owned Chicago. Capone wasn't famous for anything heroic. He was notorious for enmeshing the windy city in everything from bootlegged booze and prostitution to murder. Capone had a lawyer nicknamed "Easy Eddie." He ...
Read More »
Time to get over Russiaphobia
March 09, 2018
Time to Get Over the Russophobia By Patrick J. Buchanan Time to Get Over the Russophobia Share Pat's Columns: Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on LinkedIn Share on StumbleUpon Friday - March 9, 2018 Unless there is a late surge for Communist Party candidate ...
Read More »
Why is the GOP Terrified of Tariffs
March 06, 2018
Linda Muller lindamuller@buchanan.org via aweber.com 9:26 PM (8 hours ago) to me Dear Brigade, Once the president mentioned a tariff, I knew all hell would break loose. I also knew Pat Buchanan would follow up with a terrific column hammering the naysayers and clearly explaining why and how tariffs are ...
Read More »
[View More Blogs...]

Powered by
Morris Technology