[Report Abuse]
[Login to Blog] Funkentelecky's Blog
Trump Was Right to End Unconstitutional Obamacare
SFC (RET) U.S. Army Combat Veteran, Patriot, Conservative
Last comment by HMJC 5 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

Trump Was Right to End Unconstitutional Obamacare Subsidies

By David French

They were never lawful because Congress never appropriated the money.

It’s a sad sign of our times that the constitutionality of any given government action is now seen as a wholly secondary consideration, subordinate to politics and arguments about politics. And so it is with Donald Trump’s necessary decision to halt federal payments of cost-sharing subsidies to insurance companies.

For example, here’s how the Washington Post led off its coverage of Trump’s decision: “President Trump is throwing a bomb into the insurance marketplaces created under the Affordable Care Act, choosing to end critical payments to health insurers that help millions of lower-income Americans afford coverage.”

The New York Times headlined its article with the declaration “Trump to scrap critical health care subsidies, hitting Obamacare again.” But that’s not exactly right. In reality, the Constitution scraps Obama’s subsidies. They were never lawful because Congress never appropriated the money. Here’s the legal background.

Section 1402 of Obamacare requires insurance companies to reduce deductibles, copayments, and other similar payments for lower-income consumers and then says that the federal government will reimburse the insurers for their losses. Specifically, insurers will notify the federal government of the amount of their price reductions, and the government will “make periodic and timely payments to the insurer equal to the value of the reductions.”

Clear enough? There was just one problem. Unlike other provisions of Obamacare covering other forms of subsidies (for example, Section 1401, which funded subsidies that helped cover insurance premiums), the law didn’t specifically appropriate any money to fund these payments.

This isn’t a small thing. In fact, it implicates the core constitutional structure of our government. Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution unambiguously declares that “no Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by law.” The most relevant federal appropriations statute states quite clearly that “a law may be construed to make an appropriation out of the Treasury . . . only if the law specifically states that an appropriation is made.”

In fact, there is unmistakeable evidence that President Obama knew that his administration needed a specific appropriation to fund Section 1402 subsidies — he asked Congress for the money. Congress said no. It didn’t appropriate a single dime. So Obama did what he did best: He “penned and phoned” the subsidies into existence. He directly violated the Constitution by spending the money anyway.

The House of Representatives sued, and on May 12, 2016, federal district court judge Rosemary Collyer ruled in the House’s favor and held that the Obama administration’s payments were unlawful. Her opinion reads like a 38-page civics lesson, but for all its length the court’s core holding is simple: “The Affordable Care Act unambiguously appropriates money for Section 1401 premium tax credits but not for Section 1402 reimbursements to insurers. Such an appropriation cannot be inferred.”

The Obama administration argued that blocking the payments would lead to “absurd economic, fiscal, and healthcare-policy results.” The judge’s response was constitutionally and legally sound:

The only result of the ACA, however, is that the Section 1402 reimbursements must be funded annually. Far from absurd, that is a perfectly valid means of appropriation. The results predicted by the [administration] flow not from the ACA, but from Congress’ subsequent refusal to appropriate money.

In other words, if you have a problem with the lack of appropriation, take it up with the House and Senate.

Technocrats of all ideological stripes consistently find the Constitution frustrating. If it weren’t for that pesky document, our benevolent dictators could all pen and phone their way to utopia. But there are good reasons for leaving appropriations to Congress. As Josh Blackman reminded us in an outstanding and comprehensive piece in National Review Online last year, James Madison wrote in Federalist 58 that “this power over the purse may, in fact, be regarded as the most complete and effectual weapon with which any constitution can arm the immediate representatives of the people.”

Every two years we elect the entire House and one-third of the Senate. There is thus a constant potential check on government expenditures. The fact that Congress rarely checks that spending makes its power no less legally real nor any less constitutionally necessary. And, by the way, judges do not exist to correct subjectively determined deficiencies in the elected branches’ policy-making.

While there are many reasons to complain about the Trump administration’s approach to the Constitution, his decision to end illegal subsidies is exactly right. If defenders of Obamacare want to blame anyone, they can blame their own side. When Democrats controlled the government and could fashion the law how they liked, they provided for annual appropriations. That was their decision. If they want to “fix” that law now, they can either make a deal or win elections. Continuing to violate the Constitution, however, is not a viable choice.



Latest Activity: Oct 13, 2017 at 10:04 PM

Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by Funkentelecky
Send Funkentelecky a Message
Report Abuse

Blog has been viewed (412) times.

gacpl commented on Friday, Oct 13, 2017 at 23:39 PM

Not sure if you mentioned this. The judge also said the company's that received money received stolen money.

Funkentelecky commented on Friday, Oct 13, 2017 at 23:55 PM

The more corruption exposed, the merrier it is for true constituionalist. Obama, Pelosi and Schumer ar'ent.

timeontarget commented on Saturday, Oct 14, 2017 at 07:53 AM

We are witness to the revelation that our Federal Government has become extremely corrupted and much treason has been committed.

HMJC commented on Monday, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:05 PM

We have to keep in mind that the media is not about educating the masses, it is about putting what the most "alarming" headline is going to read minus the facts and impetus for the POTUS decision making process. Nobama care was built to fail from the get-go; it pushed critical provisions down the road under the assumption the rest will work itself out. We all know this has not been the case and as with any decision that involves money there is never a consensus or agreement. This does not negate the issue that the ship needs to be righted and the hard chocies made; something the Democrats have not done and will continue to push it as far down the road as long as they can.

Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by Funkentelecky
Take the 'Racist Xenophobe' Quiz:
February 25, 2018
Take the 'Racist Xenophobe' Quiz: Who Said This About Illegal Immigration? Which alleged "racist xenophobe" made these statements about illegal immigration? "Those who enter the country illegally and those who employ them disrespect the rule of law, and they are showing disregard for those who are following the law. We ...
Read More »
President Trump: Have Education Department Mandate
February 19, 2018
President Trump: Have Education Department Mandate Active Shooter Protocols By Laurence Meyers I’m a small government guy, however, it’s sadly apparent that the United States of America is paralyzed with political indecision over something the State of Israel figured out more than 40 years ago: all schools should have mandated ...
Read More »
Black History Month "Walter E. Williams"
February 18, 2018
Silence, support of the status quo by its leaders makes mockery of black history celebrations and represents a betrayal of epic proportions to the blood, sweat and tears Carter G. Woodson, noted scholar, historian and educator, created "Negro History Week" in 1926, which became Black History Month in 1976. Woodson ...
Read More »
'Black History Month' Larry Elder
February 18, 2018
What Left-Wing Educators Don't Teach During 'Black History M0nth' When will Black History Month be ... history? Apart from the bizarre notion that educators should set aside one month to salute the historical achievements of one race apart from and above the historical achievements of other races, Black History Month ...
Read More »
Pretending Our Way To Decline
February 16, 2018
By Paul Mirengoff I Powerline had hoped that the idiotic left-wing outrage at Attorney General Sessions’ use of the term “Anglo-American law enforcement” would dissipate without making it into mainstream discussion. The fact that former President Obama has referred to the Anglo-American nature of our justice system seemed to support ...
Read More »
[View More Blogs...]

Powered by
Morris Technology