[Report Abuse]
[Login to Blog] Funkentelecky's Blog
Trump Was Right to End Unconstitutional Obamacare
SFC (RET) U.S. Army Combat Veteran, Patriot, Conservative
Last comment by HMJC 1 month ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form


Trump Was Right to End Unconstitutional Obamacare Subsidies

By David French

They were never lawful because Congress never appropriated the money.

It’s a sad sign of our times that the constitutionality of any given government action is now seen as a wholly secondary consideration, subordinate to politics and arguments about politics. And so it is with Donald Trump’s necessary decision to halt federal payments of cost-sharing subsidies to insurance companies.

For example, here’s how the Washington Post led off its coverage of Trump’s decision: “President Trump is throwing a bomb into the insurance marketplaces created under the Affordable Care Act, choosing to end critical payments to health insurers that help millions of lower-income Americans afford coverage.”

The New York Times headlined its article with the declaration “Trump to scrap critical health care subsidies, hitting Obamacare again.” But that’s not exactly right. In reality, the Constitution scraps Obama’s subsidies. They were never lawful because Congress never appropriated the money. Here’s the legal background.

Section 1402 of Obamacare requires insurance companies to reduce deductibles, copayments, and other similar payments for lower-income consumers and then says that the federal government will reimburse the insurers for their losses. Specifically, insurers will notify the federal government of the amount of their price reductions, and the government will “make periodic and timely payments to the insurer equal to the value of the reductions.”

Clear enough? There was just one problem. Unlike other provisions of Obamacare covering other forms of subsidies (for example, Section 1401, which funded subsidies that helped cover insurance premiums), the law didn’t specifically appropriate any money to fund these payments.

This isn’t a small thing. In fact, it implicates the core constitutional structure of our government. Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution unambiguously declares that “no Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by law.” The most relevant federal appropriations statute states quite clearly that “a law may be construed to make an appropriation out of the Treasury . . . only if the law specifically states that an appropriation is made.”

In fact, there is unmistakeable evidence that President Obama knew that his administration needed a specific appropriation to fund Section 1402 subsidies — he asked Congress for the money. Congress said no. It didn’t appropriate a single dime. So Obama did what he did best: He “penned and phoned” the subsidies into existence. He directly violated the Constitution by spending the money anyway.

The House of Representatives sued, and on May 12, 2016, federal district court judge Rosemary Collyer ruled in the House’s favor and held that the Obama administration’s payments were unlawful. Her opinion reads like a 38-page civics lesson, but for all its length the court’s core holding is simple: “The Affordable Care Act unambiguously appropriates money for Section 1401 premium tax credits but not for Section 1402 reimbursements to insurers. Such an appropriation cannot be inferred.”

The Obama administration argued that blocking the payments would lead to “absurd economic, fiscal, and healthcare-policy results.” The judge’s response was constitutionally and legally sound:

The only result of the ACA, however, is that the Section 1402 reimbursements must be funded annually. Far from absurd, that is a perfectly valid means of appropriation. The results predicted by the [administration] flow not from the ACA, but from Congress’ subsequent refusal to appropriate money.

In other words, if you have a problem with the lack of appropriation, take it up with the House and Senate.

Technocrats of all ideological stripes consistently find the Constitution frustrating. If it weren’t for that pesky document, our benevolent dictators could all pen and phone their way to utopia. But there are good reasons for leaving appropriations to Congress. As Josh Blackman reminded us in an outstanding and comprehensive piece in National Review Online last year, James Madison wrote in Federalist 58 that “this power over the purse may, in fact, be regarded as the most complete and effectual weapon with which any constitution can arm the immediate representatives of the people.”

Every two years we elect the entire House and one-third of the Senate. There is thus a constant potential check on government expenditures. The fact that Congress rarely checks that spending makes its power no less legally real nor any less constitutionally necessary. And, by the way, judges do not exist to correct subjectively determined deficiencies in the elected branches’ policy-making.

While there are many reasons to complain about the Trump administration’s approach to the Constitution, his decision to end illegal subsidies is exactly right. If defenders of Obamacare want to blame anyone, they can blame their own side. When Democrats controlled the government and could fashion the law how they liked, they provided for annual appropriations. That was their decision. If they want to “fix” that law now, they can either make a deal or win elections. Continuing to violate the Constitution, however, is not a viable choice.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/452660/obamacare-subsidy-payments%3A-trump-illegal-subsidies

______________________


Latest Activity: Oct 13, 2017 at 10:04 PM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by Funkentelecky
Send Funkentelecky a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (260) times.

gacpl commented on Friday, Oct 13, 2017 at 23:39 PM

Not sure if you mentioned this. The judge also said the company's that received money received stolen money.

Funkentelecky commented on Friday, Oct 13, 2017 at 23:55 PM

The more corruption exposed, the merrier it is for true constituionalist. Obama, Pelosi and Schumer ar'ent.

timeontarget commented on Saturday, Oct 14, 2017 at 07:53 AM

We are witness to the revelation that our Federal Government has become extremely corrupted and much treason has been committed.

HMJC commented on Monday, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:05 PM

We have to keep in mind that the media is not about educating the masses, it is about putting what the most "alarming" headline is going to read minus the facts and impetus for the POTUS decision making process. Nobama care was built to fail from the get-go; it pushed critical provisions down the road under the assumption the rest will work itself out. We all know this has not been the case and as with any decision that involves money there is never a consensus or agreement. This does not negate the issue that the ship needs to be righted and the hard chocies made; something the Democrats have not done and will continue to push it as far down the road as long as they can.


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by Funkentelecky
 
Black-on-Black Racism at Elite Campuses
November 13, 2017
A Rasmussen poll taken in 2013 asked American adults, "Are most white Americans racist?" "Are most Hispanic Americans racist?" and "Are most black Americans racist?" Of the three groups, the winner was blacks. Thirty-seven percent said most blacks were racist; 18 percent felt most Hispanics were racist; and 15 percent ...
Read More »
 
The Naked Communist
November 06, 2017
THE NAKED COMMUNIST: 45 COMMUNIST GOALS On Jan. 10, 1963, Congressman Albert S. Herlong Jr. of Florida read a list of 45 Communist goals into the Congressional Record. The list was derived from researcher Cleon Skousen’s book “The Naked Communist.” These principles are well worth revisiting today in order to ...
Read More »
 
Now I Have Had Enough
October 19, 2017
Published on Sep 25, 2017 Now I Have Had Enough - Brandon Tatum Destroys the NFL Brandon Tatum is a police officer in Tucson, Arizona, and he is a former college football player for the University of Arizona. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEcYDa7r4-I
Read More »
 
It's Official: Democrats Are The Extremists Today
October 17, 2017
Partisanship: Everyone knows that the country is more politically polarized than ever, but most don't know why. Data from the highly respected Pew Research Center provides a definitive answer. It's because Democrats have moved sharply to the extreme left. The Pew report — titled "The Partisan Divide on Political Values ...
Read More »
 
I’m mad as hell and I’m not taking it anymore
October 07, 2017
Black America is wrong to blame white racism for woes By L. Todd Wood I know of no white person alive today in the United States who has ever legally owned a black slave, or any slave for that matter. Almost 700,000 mostly white men died 160 years ago to ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology