[Report Abuse]
[Login to Blog] timeontarget's Blog
2016 VOTER FRAUD
Last comment by HMJC 2 months, 3 weeks ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

New Report Exposes Thousands of Illegal Votes from 2016 Election

Hans von Spakovsky By Hans von Spakovsky | July 28, 2017 | 4:35 PM EDT


A new bombshell study released by the Government Accountability Institute shows why President Donald Trump’s Advisory Commission on Election Integrity has such an important job ahead of it.

The Institute concluded in its report that thousands of votes in the 2016 election were illegal duplicate votes from people who registered and voted in more than one state.

The Government Accountability Institute, founded by Peter Schweizer, author of “Clinton Cash,” seeks to “investigate and expose crony capitalism, misuse of taxpayer monies, and other governmental corruption or malfeasance.”

Over the last few months, the Institute sought to obtain “public voter information” from every state in order to search for duplicate votes. This is the same type of information the president’s Election Integrity Commission has requested.

With this report, we may have a clue as to why some states are resisting providing this data.

The Government Accountability Institute was able to obtain voter registration and voter history data from only 21 states because while some states shared it freely, “others impose exorbitant costs or refuse to comply with voter information requests.”

These 21 states represent “about 17 percent of all possible state-to-state comparison combinations.”

The Institute compared the lists using an “extremely conservative matching approach that sought only to identify two votes cast in the same legal name.” It found that 8,471 votes in 2016 were “highly likely” duplicates.

Extrapolating this to all 50 states would likely produce, with “high-confidence,” around 45,000 duplicate votes.

The Institute obtained this level of confidence by matching not only names and birthdays—which can be the same for different individuals—but also by contracting with companies, such as Virtual DBS, that have commercial databases to further cross-check these individuals using their Social Security Numbers and other information.

According to the Government Accountability Institute’s experts, “the probability of correctly matching two records with the same name, birthdate, and social security number is close to 100 percent.” In fact, “using these match points will result in virtually zero false positives.”

The probability of 45,000 illegal duplicate votes is the low end of the spectrum, and it does not even account for other types of fraud such as ineligible voting by noncitizens and felons and absentee ballot fraud.

To put this number of fraudulent votes in perspective, Hillary Clinton won New Hampshire by fewer than 3,000 votes out of over 700,000 cast. Just this number of duplicate votes alone has the power to swing state results and, in turn, elections.

Unfortunately, New Hampshire refused to turn over their data for this study.

There have been other razor-tight elections in recent years. In 2000, the presidency was decided by 537 votes out of a total of 105 million cast. In 2008, Al Franken won his Minnesota Senate race by a mere 312 votes. He ended up being the deciding vote that gave this country Obamacare.

Though the Institute did not look at the 2008 elections in this study, there is little doubt that the 2016 numbers show that duplicate voting and voter fraud are a real problem that can have serious consequential effects.

The Government Accountability Institute also used the state of Rhode Island as a test case. Over 30 percent of all registered voters in Rhode Island have no Social Security or driver’s license number on file.

While it is legal to register without providing this information, the Institute notes that “confirming the identities of some of these voters is impossible using only the data contained in the state’s voter registration system.”

Without this “uniquely identifying information … there is no way to confirm a voter’s identity or citizenship …” This shows the vulnerabilities that are ripe for any person or group wanting to take advantage of them.

The Institute also found more than 15,000 voters registered at prohibited addresses “such as post office boxes, UPS stores, federal post offices, and public buildings.” In some cases, more than 100 voters “were registered to the same UPS store locations.”

They also found voters whose registered addresses were “gas stations, vacant lots, abandoned mill buildings, basketball courts, parks, warehouses, and office buildings.”

The Institute tried to bring some of these problems to the attention of Rhode Island election officials as part of their test case. They provided officials with a list of 225 voters who “were registered using prohibited addresses.”

But Rhode Island refused to do anything about the problem beyond sending a letter to the voters. If a voter did not respond, the state refused to take any further action.

Instead, in an obvious attempt to deter the Government Accountability Institute, the state said that the Institute would have to file a “voter challenge” and would be subject to a misdemeanor penalty if it filed a “false challenge.”

The fact that these election officials did not want to thoroughly investigate possible voter fraud illustrates one of the problems in this area: Too many election officials don’t want to know about these problems, and refuse to do anything when it is brought to their attention.

The Government Accountability Institute points out that the quality of the voter registration data in some states is very poor, with missing and obviously incorrect information. The Institute found 45,880 votes cast by individuals whose dates of birth were more than 115 years before the election.

Several hundred votes were cast by individuals whose registration birthdates “indicated they were under 18 years old at the time of the election,” although some of these were through provisional ballots.

All of this is just the latest evidence that we have serious, substantive problems in our voter registration system across the country and that voter fraud is, without a doubt, real.

The Heritage Foundation has a database that is being constantly updated. It documents nearly 1,100 proven instances of voter fraud, including cases where elections were overturned because of proven fraud.

This kind of work, which the Government Accountability Institute has done, will be invaluable to the Election Integrity Commission as it researches the registration and voting process and looks for ways to fix its vulnerabilities and security problems, enhance our democratic process, and make sure every eligible American votes and is not disenfranchised by illegal votes.

Election integrity and public confidence in the election process are fundamental to preserving our democratic republic.

Disclosure: Hans von Spakovsky is a member of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity mentioned in this article.

Hans von Spakovsky is an authority on a wide range of issues—including civil rights, civil justice, the First Amendment, immigration, the rule of law and government reform—as a senior legal fellow in The Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies and manager of the think tank’s Election Law Reform Initiative.

Ben Janacek is a member of the Young Leaders Program at The Heritage Foundation.

Editor's Note: This piece was originally published by The Daily Signal.


Latest Activity: Jul 30, 2017 at 6:10 AM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by timeontarget
Send timeontarget a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (364) times.

Sheran commented on Sunday, Jul 30, 2017 at 20:55 PM

WOW,TOT, you Hi-jacked my blog! Really? This is why there's no body blogging anymore! Copy and paste then pull a Democratic move... Shame on you.

timeontarget commented on Monday, Jul 31, 2017 at 06:24 AM

Please excuse me.

We all have our methods and preferences with how we want to do things.

When you post only a link I am not inclined to open it for security reasons.

If you'd like for me to read something I prefer that you copy and paste. That way (as I see it) the actual writer and publisher is identified.

I'd be interested in other's opinion regarding this matter.

HMJC commented on Monday, Jul 31, 2017 at 12:22 PM

TOT, you have been getting hammered on this for a long time... cutting and pasting does not count as an opinion, more as an observation. This coupled with most of your cut and paste being from editorial or opinion pieces does not deem its musings as factual. I am of the "opinion" that one of the reasons this site exists to be able to freely voice your views and at times offer your own form of resolution. There is nothing wrong with providing references for your musings but simply cutting and pasting does not mean that "you" have made your point.

At the end of the day how you choose to participate is your right regardless of others opinions but don't get upset when we don't find your musings relevant because they are not your musings.

Funkentelecky commented on Monday, Jul 31, 2017 at 19:14 PM

First of all let me acknowledge that I appreciate what HMJC has been doing by generating his own original thoughts, I used to do it a few years ago however when I blog now I copy and paste , place the link at the bottom and about 80% of the time post a paragraph or to it to support the writers statements.

To Sheran I usually won't open a link without some hint of how much material I have to read and. even sometimes the link won't open. So since TOT didn't open it he didn't know exactly what you were posting, and neither did I until you commented about it. I'm confident if he had know he wouldn't have done it.

timeontarget commented on Tuesday, Aug 01, 2017 at 07:33 AM

My response to HMJC's blog above:

timeontarget commented on Tuesday, Aug 01, 2017 at 07:31 AM
HMJC to every point of your blog let me say clearly that I agree with you.

I initially started to copy and paste because i felt (and still do) that it is better to do that and let the writer and publisher be identified.

I will let that technique rest for a short time.

I do find copy and paste to be better than posting links.

I will never open a link on this site without prior knowledge of the content, author and publisher.

I will do all that I can to assist you in a new effort to return this Courier blog site to more of a "forum" and hopefully the few remaining participants will do likewise.

Thanks for politely calling me out.

And yes I agree that name calling and hurling personal insults should be avoided and not permitted.

We need more discussion regarding our local events.

Hopefully we can improve this site.

Funkentelecky commented on Tuesday, Aug 01, 2017 at 18:54 PM

TOT, I respect a person who can take objective criticism and I said before when JimmyMack called you out that I had no problem with copy and paste as long as you supported the blog with your own statements too. Happy Blogging, sir!

timeontarget commented on Wednesday, Aug 02, 2017 at 07:15 AM

Funk I will continue to copy and paste but I also agree with HMJC in that we need more discussion and original material.

Liberty County and Hinesville, Flemington, Midway, Riceboro, Allenhurst and Walthourville collectively should give us plenty to talk about.

Funkentelecky commented on Wednesday, Aug 02, 2017 at 07:21 AM

Yes , I agree with him too and I'll be glad to add me 2 cents worth towards the conversation.

HMJC commented on Wednesday, Aug 02, 2017 at 14:33 PM

Good to see Ya back Funk...


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by timeontarget
 
Corruption and Treason
October 19, 2017
The FBI was aware of the corrupt maneuvering, of Obama and Hillary as they prepared to sell twenty percent of US Uranium holdings, and did nothing to halt the transfer of material which is vital in the production of atomic bombs. We are flabbergasted that the FBI simply continued investigating ...
Read More »
 
A POLITICAL STATEMENT
October 09, 2017
THIS IS A POLITICAL STATEMENT. IF YOU DON'T LIKE POLITICAL STATEMENTS, BY ALL MEANS, DON'T READ IT! Subject: Raccoons I don't know who wrote this, but it is fantastic! This is WHY Trump has such a following. Many have asked me if I support the republican party? Here is a ...
Read More »
 
Buchanan/On our unity or lack thereof
October 03, 2017
Moment of Unity in a Disintegrating World By Patrick J. Buchanan Tuesday - October 3, 2017 "An act of pure evil," said President Trump of the atrocity in Las Vegas, invoking our ancient faith: "Scripture teaches us the Lord is close to the brokenhearted and saves those who are crushed ...
Read More »
 
Federal Govt.Subsidize /NFL , other Sport
October 01, 2017
Why the federal government should stop spending billions on private sports stadiums Why the federal government should stop spending billions on private sports stadiums Alexander K. Gold, Austin J. Drukker, and Ted Gayer Thursday, September 8, 2016 When the New York Yankees completed the new Yankee Stadium in 2009, the ...
Read More »
 
Government finances NFL Stadiums
September 29, 2017
Here’s How Much Money the NFL Rakes in From Taxpayers Jarrett Stepman / @JarrettStepman / September 26, 2017 / nts A report on Watchdog.org says that over the past two decades, the NFL has raked in about $7 billion of taxpayer money to spend on stadium renovation and building. Commentary ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology