[Report Abuse]
[Login to Blog] Funkentelecky's Blog
Washington Post flat-out lies to cover for Meryl S
SFC (RET) U.S. Army Combat Veteran, Patriot, Conservative
Last comment by wayne44 4 days, 11 hours ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

Washington Post flat-out lies to cover for Meryl Streep's slander that Trump mocked a disabled reporter

Not even arguable.

Meryl Streep should understand this well. It's Hollywood's specialty to use images and clever editing to make things appear to be what they actually are not. This is what the movies are all about - fakery done so cleverly and convincingly, you can suspend disbelief and think of it like it's real, even though you know better.

Maybe Streep has done this for so many years, she can no longer recognize that these fakeries, however clever, are in fact fake. Maybe she thinks that only Hollywood does this, and she doesn't realize that in their own way the news media are just as good at it.

Whatever is behind her delusion, Streep has credulously and uncritically bought into the media-peddled nonsense that Donald Trump mocked the disability of New York Times reporter Serge Kovaleski. It was the leading slander she offered in her attack on Trump the other night at the Golden Globes:

There was one performance this year that stunned me. It sank its hooks in my heart. Not because it was good. There was nothing good about it. But it was effective, and it did its job. It made its intended audience laugh and show their teeth.

It was that moment when the person asking to sit in the most respected seat in our country imitated a disabled reporter. Someone he outranked in privilege, power and the capacity to fight back. It kind of broke my heart when I saw it. I still can’t get it out of my head because it wasn’t in a movie. It was real life.


We dealt with this in October. The charge is a total falsehood. It simply never happened. You could do worse than to read our entire piece on it again, but all you need to do is watch the video presentation by Catholics4Trump that we showed you then, and will show you again right now:

Once you see this, you realize what really happened is that the news media cleverly used still shots and edited video to make it appear Trump had mocked Kovaleski, when in fact he did no such thing. And speaking of people who possess outsized power, the media's ability to peddle this lie unchallenged day after day has many people to this day believing the story is true.

I am somewhat reticent about calling people liars. In my headline, I chose to call Streep wrong instead of calling her a liar because I don't think it's likely she knows the truth. I think she pretty well laps up whatever the MSM feeds her, and she is not smart enough to think critically and consider the possibility that she's been fooled. After all, what Meryl Streep does for a living is read words other people write for her. It is not her specialty to think for herself.

I know many actors and I respect them immensely. Many of them are very smart and very fine people. But not many would do well getting up in front of the nation and making a political speech because most would not know what they were talking about. The fact that Meryl Streep is a very famous actor doesn't make her an exception to this rule. If anything, she is worse because her fame has her convinced she speaks with authority, when in fact she is just a dupe spouting things that aren't true.

I am less willing to be charitable, however, to Washington Post writer Callum Borchers. He is a liar. And I say that because he is well aware of the information that proves the charge against Trump to be a bad rap, and yet in a column published this morning he defended Streep's charge and doubled down on the assertion that Trump did, in fact, mock Kovaleski's disability. It is the worst kind of commentary - devoid of any evidence to back up the assertion offered, and based on mainly on the presumed authority of the people making the charge:

As I've written before, Trump's defense simply isn't believable. Kovaleski, who covered Trump long before the real estate mogul entered politics, has said that "Donald and I were on a first-name basis for years." Trump was undoubtedly aware of Kovaleski's disability.

Trump apologists such as Ann Coulter have claimed that he has mocked other, non-disabled people in exactly the same fashion — supposedly proving that he was not imitating Kovaleski — but their assertions are not supported by video evidence (more on that here). Trump's impression of Kovaleski was unique and clearly specific to him.

Go ahead and click the link and watch the very brief video segments Borchers includes, then go back and watch the video we embedded above from Catholics4Trump, then tell me who has the stronger argument. Even the clips Borchers offers don't show that Trump's motions are very similar to Kovaleski's. He captures one still shot that happens to show Trump's hand in a similar position, and claims this is proof. This is exactly what I was talking about at the start of the piece. Hollywood uses images like that to make things appear other than what they really are. Now the Washington Post is doing the same thing.

But it gets worse: Borchers goes on to try to support his position by citing - I am not making this up - CNN's Chris Cuomo and the Post's hyperpartisan "fact checker" Glenn Kessler. Cuomo comes from a family of Democrat politicians. We've told you about Kessler, including his 2014 attack on a cancer victim for truthfully telling the public about how ObamaCare wreaked havoc with her coverage.

But none of this matters to Borchers, who figures his appeal to authority in citing Cuomo and Kessler can pass for credibility:

On CNN Monday morning, Trump senior adviser Kellyanne Conway protested the notion that the incoming president made fun of Kovaleski's disability.

"You can't give him the benefit of the doubt on this, and he's telling you what was in his heart?" Conway asked anchor Chris Cuomo.

"It's a gesture that he's making on video," Cuomo replied. "Everyone can see it."

Exactly. There is no doubt.

There is no doubt? Based on a few seconds of edited video, and despite all the evidence to suggest the video is being misconstrued and misrepresented? No doubt? This from the people who claim to be skeptics for a living, and demand evidence of things that seem to be, and say, "If your mother says she loves you, check it out"?

No doubt?

Not only is there plenty of room for doubt, there's almost no room for believing the conventional narrative on this once you know the whole story. Borchers is well aware of all the reasons for doubt, and he dismisses them simply by declaring them not believable. He can't possibly be so stupid as to believe the argument he is making.

Meryl Streep is merely a gullible fool. Callum Borchers is a liar, as are the editors of the Washington Post for publishing his garbage. They also know it isn't true. But it's their story and they're sticking to it because they can't admit the media creates deceptions intentionally with an agenda in mind.

If the Washington Post tells you your mother loves you, check it out. And if Callum Borchers tells you that, ask your mother how you can win her heart back. You've lost it.


Latest Activity: Jan 11, 2017 at 12:17 AM

Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by Funkentelecky
Send Funkentelecky a Message
Report Abuse

Blog has been viewed (148) times.

Funkentelecky commented on Wednesday, Jan 11, 2017 at 00:31 AM

As Donald Trump said, it isn't true that he mocked a disabled reporter. Please read this blog and its links and also review the video. Trump is captured on video 3 times imitating movements of a flustered individual instead of mocking an individual. He did it with Ted Cruz an Army General and the disabled reporter. As you will see and realize in the video the disabled reporter can't move his limbs like Trump did. If Trump would have singled him out and mocked him he would have been stiff and without movement. What say you?

wayne44 commented on Thursday, Jan 12, 2017 at 14:52 PM

It has come to the point that facts no longer matter. Its the agenda that is the driving force behind the misinformation and just plan lies of the main-stream media. Journalists are supposed to report the facts and only the facts and not their opinions. The op-ed part of the newspaper is reserved for opinion pieces. Too bad most of them have forgotten that.

Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by Funkentelecky
The NAACP Stoops to New Low with Jeff Sessions Sit
January 10, 2017
The NAACP Stoops to New Low with Jeff Sessions Sit-In Protest By Raynard Jackson Once again, the radical liberal National Association for the Advancement of “Certain” People (NAACP) has proven that Blacks can indeed sellout their own people and even be extremely hypocritical. The NAACP’s perpetual promotion to the Black ...
Read More »
Chicago: The Democratic Murder Capital Of America!
January 04, 2017
Chicago: The Democratic Murder Capital Of America! – Lunch Alert! Click Here to give me your thoughts and continue the discussion. Please forward this email to any friends or family who may be interested in viewing my video commentary! Thanks for watching, Dick http://www.dickmorris.com/chicago-democratic-murder-capital-america-lunch-alert/
Read More »
How To Repeal ObamaCare
January 04, 2017
A recent column by Heather R. Higgins and Phil Kerpen really points the way to how to get rid of this obnoxious program. Their ideas are similar to ones I have ventured in this space. Zero fund the fines for failure to buy insurance or offer it to one’s workers. ...
Read More »
For Democrats, 2017 Will Be The Year of Living Stu
January 03, 2017
For Democrats, 2017 Will Be The Year of Living Stupidly If you thought 2016 was packed full of liberal foolishness, just wait until you get a load of 2017. As 2016 ends, progressives enter the New Year terrified that Donald Trump will continue to run circles around them, and their ...
Read More »
Don't Trash The Electoral College — It Works
January 02, 2017
Election 2016: Suddenly, Democrats on the losing end of a presidential election have rediscovered an American institution that they loathe and want to get rid of — the electoral college. There are many reasons for abolishing the electoral college, but almost all of them are bad. With the popular vote ...
Read More »
[View More Blogs...]

Powered by
Morris Technology