[Report Abuse]
[Login to Blog] timeontarget's Blog
Has Hillary Ever Been Right?
Last comment by timeontarget 1 year, 12 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

Has Hillary Ever Been Right?

Friday - August 29, 2014 at 12:12 am

By Patrick J. Buchanan

Sen. Rand Paul raises an interesting question:

When has Hillary Clinton ever been right on foreign policy?

The valkyrie of the Democratic Party says she urged President Obama to do more to aid Syrian rebels years ago. And last summer, she supported air strikes on Bashar Assad’s regime.

Had we followed her advice and crippled Assad’s army, ISIS might be in Damascus today, butchering Christians and Alawites and aiding the Islamic State in Iraq in overrunning Baghdad.

But if the folly of attacking Assad’s army and weakening its resistance to ISIS terrorists is apparent to everyone this summer, why were Clinton, Obama and Secretary of State Kerry oblivious to this reality just a year ago?

Consider the rest of Hillary’s record. Her most crucial decision as Senator came in 2002 when she voted to invade Iraq. She now concedes it was the greatest mistake of her Senate career.

She voted against the surge in 2006, but confided to Defense Secretary Bob Gates that she did so to maintain her political viability for 2008.

This is statesmanship? Not voting your convictions about what is best for your country at war, so as not to antagonize the liberals in the Iowa caucuses?

In 2009, Hillary presented a “reset button” to Vladimir Putin’s foreign minister. In 2011, she supported U.S. air strikes to bring down Col. Gadhafi and celebrated in Tripoli when he was overthrown and lynched.

How did that work out? Libya is today a hellhole of murder and mayhem and Islamists are threatening a takeover.

Who did Hillary think would rise when Gadhafi fell?

Hillary’s failure to anticipate or prevent the Benghazi massacre and her role in the botched cover-up, all concede, are burdens she will carry into the primaries in 2016, should she run.

Where, then, has Hillary exhibited the acumen to suggest she would be a wise and savvy steward of U.S. foreign policy in a disintegrating world?

Is this a convincing argument for the Republican alternative?

Hardly. The principal GOP voices on foreign policy, who get more airtime than Wolf Blitzer, are John McCain and Lindsey Graham.

Their track record: McCain wanted to confront Putin over South Ossetia. He and Graham wanted to arm Ukrainians to fight the Russians in Crimea, Luhansk and Donetsk. They wanted Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia brought into NATO, so that if war were to break out, we would be fighting the Russians alongside them.

This year, Graham was trolling around a Senate resolution to give Obama a blank check to attack Iran.

Last year, McCain and Graham were for attacking Assad’s army. This year they are for bombing ISIS, which is attacking Assad’s army.

But if Hillary, McCain and Graham have been repeatedly wrong about Syria, what do we now? Answer: Stop and think.

First, this war in Syria and Iraq, like all such wars, is eventually going to be won by soldiers, by boots on the ground, by troops who can take and hold territory. And in such wars, as Napoleon said, God is on the side of the big battalions.

America should declare to friends and allies in the Middle East, as Nixon did to our friends and allies in Asia in the Guam Doctrine of 1969, that while we will stand with them when they are attacked, they, not we, will provide the soldiers for their own defense.

No nation is less threatened by ISIS than ours. And as the Syrians, Turks, Kurds and Iraqis have the proximity and manpower to defeat ISIS, they should do this job themselves.

Turkey shares a 550-mile border with Syria and could march in and crush ISIS. But if President Recep Tayyip Erdogan wishes to play games with ISIS, out of hatred of Assad, let him and the Turks live with the consequences.

As for Syria’s army and regime, which either defeats ISIS or dies, let us cease impeding their efforts by backing a Free Syrian Army that has rarely won a battle and is only bleeding the Syrian army.

Kurdistan and its ethnic cousins in Syria, Turkey and Iran are capable of defending themselves, and we should encourage any nation, including Iran, that is willing to send them the weapons to fight ISIS.

As for Baghdad, if it wants its Sunni lands back, it either should fight for them or accept their loss. We Americans are living today with the consequences, in considerable losses of blood and treasure, of fighting other people’s wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.

Yet, we are suffering not at all from having kept out of other people’s wars — in Georgia, Crimea, Donetsk, Syria and Iran.

Speaking of the debate over U.S. air strikes in Syria, the New York Times writes, “There are too many unanswered questions to make that decision now, and there has been far too little public discussion for Mr. Obama to expect Americans to rally behind what could be another costly military commitment.”

Sometimes the Times gets it right.


Latest Activity: Aug 30, 2014 at 5:47 PM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by timeontarget
Send timeontarget a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (514) times.

timeontarget commented on Monday, Sep 01, 2014 at 06:11 AM

"you're sick and have admitted it"

You delight in insulting individuals unknown to you.

What is brave about that?

I am sorry for you my old friend but I guess you really are sick.

Unfortunately all sickness does not bring death.

I hope everybody has a happy Labor Day Holiday.


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by timeontarget
 
More dirt on the Clintons with Russia
August 29, 2016
Posted on August 26, 2016 by Paul Mirengoff in Clinton Cash, Hillary Clinton, National Security, Russia Memo sheds new light on Clinton-Russia uranium scandal Of all the Clinton Foundation/Clinton cash scandals, the one I’ve always considered most disturbing involves the Russians gaining control over a large share of America’s uranium. ...
Read More »
 
Clinton Mafia by Charles Krauthammer:
August 29, 2016
Clinton Mafia by Charles Krauthammer: Charles Krauthammer explained the Clinton Mafia on Bill O'Reilly, but it was too quick for me to get it all. Here it is in print. Question: What is your outlook regarding this Clinton Foundation? Charles Krauthammer: The Clinton Foundation is Organized Crime. Charles Krauthammer is ...
Read More »
 
More evidence of Hillary corruption
August 26, 2016
This from Allen West BREAKING: Benghazi Documents Found in Deleted Hillary Email Files John S. Roberts 08:40pm August 25, 2016 Do you like this article? Hillary Clinton and her emails. It’s going to make one heck of a novel some day. That is, if the First Amendment isn’t overturned. Looks ...
Read More »
 
From Allen West more on Hillary's Misdeeds
August 24, 2016
SMOKING GUN: Associated Press drops massive Hillary bombshell… By The Analytical Economist1:30pm August 24, 2016 As the Clinton Foundation remains the center of the latest Hillary Clinton scandal, one of the main concerns surrounds what appears to be evidence of “pay for play. ” We’ve seen Middle Eastern nations (like ...
Read More »
 
Latest from Herman Cain
August 22, 2016
Herman Cain reports BILLIONAIRE LIBERAL GEORGE SOROS uses his wealth to purchase the loyalty of our corrupt politicians in Washington. ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Leaked Soros Email: Billionaire Plowed Wealth Into SCOTUS Obama Immigration Ruling An orchestrated campaign to influence the Supreme Court .... Joe Saunders August 18, 2016 at 12:10pm Share on ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology