[Report Abuse]
[Login to Blog] PoliticsNation's Blog
17 reasons not to trust Dick Cheney on Iraq
Last comment by PoliticsNation 2 years, 5 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form


Dick Cheney has been on the media discussing his disgust for the current administrations handling of Iraq. People are outraged and don't believe he has the audacity to speak on the issue. My feelings are-he's empowered by the platform of hate that the right wing nuts have set up and currently running on. You no longer have to tell the truth or stand for anything to become an expert on political issues. The only credential you need- Hate the President of the United States and oppose anything the President is for. If you've seen the latest polls no one is buying the Republican platform or snake oil. The Presidents approval rating is at an all time low but the Democrats still lead in the polls. What does that mean? Hate never wins.


Former Vice President Dick Cheney and his daughter Liz have an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal arguing that Barack Obama is insufficiently tough on Iraq, and was wrong to "abandon" the country. They also took to Fox News to announce they were starting a new organization, the Alliance for a Strong America, that will "advocate for the policies needed to restore American power and pre-eminence."

You might be tempted to take their opinions seriously. This would be a mistake. Here are seventeen reasons why.




1) "[9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta] did go to Prague and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service in Czechoslovakia last April, several months before the attack."

- Dick Cheney, December 9, 2001.

Atta did not meet with Iraqi intelligence in Prague. Cheney knew this claim was unsubstantiated but made it publicly anyway. Also Czechoslovakia was not a country in April 2001.

2) "The issue is that [Saddam] has chemical weapons."

- Dick Cheney, March 24, 2002.

No he did not.

3) "Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction."

- Dick Cheney, August 25, 2002.

Saddam Hussein did not have weapons of mass destruction then.

4) "Another argument holds that opposing Saddam Hussein would cause even greater troubles in that part of the world, and interfere with the larger war against terror. I believe the opposite is true."

- Dick Cheney, August 25, 2002.

The Iraq War was a catastrophe that caused even greater troubles, including hundreds of thousands of deaths and millions of refugees, in that part of the world. It also harmed the war on terror.

5) "We do know, with absolute certainty, that [Saddam] is using his procurement system to acquire the equipment he needs in order to enrich uranium to build a nuclear weapon."

- Dick Cheney, September 8, 2002.

Not only was this false, especially the "absolute certainty" part, Cheney likely knew it to be false at the time he said it; the intelligence community was in fact divided about the state of Iraq's nuclear program.

6) "[Saddam] now is trying, through his illicit procurement network, to acquire the equipment he needs to be able to enrich uranium to make the bombs…Specifically aluminum tubes."

- Dick Cheney, September 8, 2002.

The tubes were for rockets. Department of Energy analysts raised doubts more than a year before Cheney made these claims about the likelihood the tubes were for enrichment.

7) "We know that [Saddam Hussein] has re-energized, if you will, his efforts to acquire a nuclear weapon."

- Dick Cheney, September 9, 2002.

The Iraq Survey Group concluded after a thorough investigation that "Saddam Hussein ended the nuclear program in 1991 following the Gulf war. ISG found no evidence to suggest concerted efforts to restart the program."

8) "We now have irrefutable evidence that [Saddam] has once again set up and reconstituted his program to take uranium, to enrich it to sufficiently high grade, so that it will function as the base material as a nuclear weapon. And there's no doubt about the fact that the level of effort has escalated in recent months."

- Dick Cheney, September 20, 2002.

Cheney knew there was not "irrefutable evidence," as the intelligence community was divided. And reality subsequently refuted the claim entirely.

9) "I think things have gotten so bad inside Iraq, from the standpoint of the Iraqi people, my belief is we will, in fact, be greeted as liberators."

- Dick Cheney, March 16, 2003.

We were not greeted as liberators.

10) "[Saddam] also had an established relationship with al Qaeda — providing training to al Qaeda members in areas of poisons, gases and conventional bombs."

- Dick Cheney, October 17, 2013.

A 2006 Senate intelligence committee report concluded, "Postwar findings support the April 2002 Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) assessment that there was no credible reporting on al-Qa'eda training at Salman Pak or anywhere else in Iraq."

11) "In Iraq, a ruthless dictator cultivated weapons of mass destruction and the means to deliver them. He gave support to terrorists, had an established relationship with al Qaeda, and his regime is no more."

- Dick Cheney, November 7, 2003.

There was no such relationship between al Qaeda and Iraq. Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction.

12) "We haven't really had the time yet to pore through all those records in Baghdad. We'll find ample evidence confirming the link, that is the connection if you will between al Qaeda and the Iraqi intelligence services. They have worked together on a number of occasions."

- Dick Cheney, January 9, 2004.

Again, there was no such relationship between al Qaeda and the Iraqi intelligence services.

13) "We know, for example, that prior to our going in that [Saddam] had spent time and effort acquiring mobile biological weapons labs, and we're quite confident he did, in fact, have such a program. We've found a couple of semi trailers at this point which we believe were, in fact, part of that program. I would deem that conclusive evidence, if you will, that he did, in fact, have programs for weapons of mass destruction."

- Dick Cheney, January 22, 2004.

A British investigation concluded those "mobile biological weapons labs" were nothing of the sort. The Iraq Survey group report states, "ISG has found no evidence to support the view that the trailers were used, or intended to be used, for the production of [biological warfare] agents."

14) "It’s clearly established in terms of training, provision of bomb-making experts, training of people with respect to chemical and biological warfare capabilities, that al-Qaeda sent personnel to Iraq for training and so forth."

- Dick Cheney, June 4, 2004.

Again, not only was that not true, but the DIA and others in the intelligence community questioned it before the war began.

15) "I think they're in the last throes, if you will, of the insurgency."

- Dick Cheney, June 20, 2005.

Anti-Iraqi government insurgency persists nine years later.

16) "I don’t think that [the war in Iraq] damaged our reputation around the world."

- Dick Cheney, August 30, 2011.

The Iraq war drastically damaged our reputation around the world.

17) "The biggest threat we face is the possibility of terrorist groups like al Qaeda equipped with weapons of mass destruction, with nukes, bugs or gas. That was the threat after 9/11 and when we took down Saddam Hussein we eliminated Iraq as a potential source of that."

- Dick Cheney, October 28, 2013.

The Iraq war took away zero weapons of mass destruction from a regime that did not have ties to al-Qaeda


I've posted the link for your review.
http://www.vox.com/2014/6/19/5822482/17-reasons-not-to-trust-dick-cheney-on-iraq


Latest Activity: Jun 19, 2014 at 2:04 PM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by PoliticsNation
Send PoliticsNation a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (880) times.

PoliticsNation commented on Thursday, Jun 19, 2014 at 14:28 PM

Petraeus keeps telling the right what it doesn’t want to hear. http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-sh...

PoliticsNation commented on Thursday, Jun 19, 2014 at 14:30 PM

@Seb-Even a clock is right twice a day.


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by PoliticsNation
 
Breaking---NO Charges For Clinton
November 06, 2016
JUST IN: FBI Director James Comey tells Congress that the agency is still of the opinion that Hillary Clinton should not face criminal charges http://cnn.it/2f7APdV
Read More »
 
The Myth of Voter Fraud
October 26, 2016
Here's how you call out a Republican with Double Standards. You use his own words against him/her and let them see how uninformed and foolish they sound... Four studies out this year show that if voting is rigged it’s in favor of Republicans. The Bush Administration and recent studies conducted ...
Read More »
 
U.S. police chiefs group apologizes to Minorities
October 26, 2016
U.S. police chiefs group apologizes for ‘historical mistreatment’ of minorities. The president of America’s largest police management organization on Monday issued a formal apology to the nation’s minority population “for the actions of the past and the role that our profession has played in society’s historical mistreatment of communities of ...
Read More »
 
Republican NFL Patriots- Why Aren't U Raising Hell
October 25, 2016
If you posted a blog on this site or joined in the conversation to share your dismay with Colin Kapernick taking a knee for injustice during the national anthem but you're not showing that same outrage towards Josh Brown's behavior (beating and bullying his wife); you my Republican friend are ...
Read More »
 
Another Top Republican Dumps The GOP&Joins Clinton
October 25, 2016
(CNN)Former Republican Secretary of State Colin Powell said Tuesday he'll vote for Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, a high-profile snub of his party's standard-bearer, Donald Trump. Powell, who also served in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations, backed President Barack Obama in both the 2008 and 2012 campaigns. He announced ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology