[Report Abuse]
[Login to Blog] PoliticsNation's Blog
Forced blood draws in Georgia by COPS (DUI Stops)!
Last comment by gacpl 6 months, 2 weeks ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form


DUI suspects face forced blood draws in some Ga. counties-. I believe DUI suspects should be punished but this may be a violation of their rights.

Suspected drunk drivers in some metro counties are getting a rude surprise when they refuse a breathalyzer test.

Instead of taking no for an answer, officers now obtain a search warrant to forcibly draw blood and get evidence for the case.


My concern is they strap you down by your head, neck arms and legs-even if you consent!


The key word: forcibly.
Read more:

http://www.myfoxatlanta.com/story/22706519/georgia-counties-seizing-dui-suspects-blood#ixzz33aM1QDJr


Latest Activity: Jun 03, 2014 at 10:29 AM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by PoliticsNation
Send PoliticsNation a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (408) times.

HMJC commented on Wednesday, Jun 04, 2014 at 08:25 AM

If your are accused of driving impaired and have nothing to hide; you should have no qualms providing proof that you are good to go.

I venture to say that if you ask a Family that has lost a loved one to the CRIME of drunk/impaired driving; they would laud the fact that more is trying to be done to eradicate drunk driving.

Ironically it seems most people worried about their "rights" being infringed upon in a lot of cases, DO have something to hide.

Anything that can be done to prevent/deter people from driving impaired saves lives. Once again at the end of the day if you have nothing to hide, then you would think you would be willing to do whatever you needed to do to prove it.

PoliticsNation commented on Wednesday, Jun 04, 2014 at 08:46 AM

@HMJC-Don't complain if your driving home from Walmart and an over zealous cop thinks you've been drinking-arrest you- strap your neck -hands- legs-arms and feet to a bed even though you agree to allow them to test your blood-they strap you down whether you agree to the test or not. Let's talk about it after that experience.

HMJC commented on Wednesday, Jun 04, 2014 at 10:57 AM

Once again, you would think one would submit willingly in order to exonerate themselves. Someone that has nothing to hide one would surmise that someone with nothing to hide ,would have no issue with a field sobriety test or breathalyzer test alleviating the need for a blood test all together.
If you are getting strapped to a gurney to obtain a blood specimen you are either guilty or have something to hide period.

This is another example of hiding behind the constitution stating ones "rights" If you are in fact of driving impaired to a certain extent you have waived some of these protections due to actions of your own consequence.

The flip side being if an officer blatantly abusing a citizens right without probably cause; that is a different discussion.

To be frank,, any personal negative encounters with Johnny Law have directly correlated with my actions. And you know what? I was wrong... my fault, not the system or the man, all me...

PoliticsNation commented on Wednesday, Jun 04, 2014 at 11:58 AM

I've never been in trouble with the law but I value my right not to have a foreign object stuck in my body because they think I'm drunk. I'm reading and listening with a third ear.

timeontarget commented on Wednesday, Jun 04, 2014 at 13:08 PM

Sister, I'm reading you loudly and clearly on this issue.

I agree with you also.

Thanks

We're rapidly becoming a police state.

And our para-military law enforcement agencies all over the country are being reported to enforce with heavy hands.

HMJC commented on Wednesday, Jun 04, 2014 at 14:47 PM

Just for the record one reason the blood test is even an issue is the high percentage of suspected drunk drivers that consistently refuse the field tests. I still try to have faith and hope that this would only be used in a "reasonable" suspicion circumstance. Drunk driving destroys lives and Families at a catastrophic rate. If you put yourself in that position you should expect to be subject to the consequences of your own actions. This is a moot point for those that do not drink and drive impaired. It is only an issue if you cross that line.

gacpl commented on Wednesday, Jun 04, 2014 at 22:03 PM

its a cause and effect action. because lawyers have successfully argued that their client wasn't drunk due to a video of them falling all over the place doesn't "legally" make them drunk. all they would get is a one year licence suspension with no DUI on their records. a few have gone on to kill people later on. if they would have been allowed to count the DUI test video seen they refused a breathalyzer some people would not have been killed by a drunk driver later. it would not have came to this if the law was kept the way it was, if you turned down a breathalyzer test you were then legally drunk, you had to sign a paper refusing the test and it said you would be considered drunk for refusing.


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by PoliticsNation
 
Examples of Institutional Racism in the USA
December 07, 2014
Jimmy Mack has shed light on a very important subject today (Institutional Racism} that is often over looked by the majority and some minorities. I thought it was important to educate the community about the subject matter above and how Institutional Racism is still alive and thriving in the workplace- ...
Read More »
 
Do whites get away with crime?
December 07, 2014
White people can get away with crimes that would land a black person behind bars — or worse. That’s the premise behind Twitter’s top trending hashtag #crimingwhilewhite, where white people acknowledge disparities between their interactions with police and people of color. The hashtag sprung up as a digital protest hours ...
Read More »
 
Judges across Georgia-cancelling Arrest Warrants
December 05, 2014
Some low-level offenders are singing-"I'll be home for Christmas" as Judges across Georgia are cancelling tens of thousands of arrest warrants tied to misdemeanor probation cases, the result of a new Supreme Court decision that has upended the way courts handle low-level offenders accused of skipping out on probation requirements. ...
Read More »
 
GOP first order of buisness-cut retirees benefits
December 04, 2014
We told you, America! Like clockwork, the first legislative deal that Republicans tried to work out would blow up the deficit by gifting corporations $440 billion in tax cuts they don't need (without any way to pay for them.) And that's not the worst part; they also fought to RAISE ...
Read More »
 
Junk Deal
October 28, 2014
GOP Governor Nathan Deal And The Longest Running Scandal in Georgia’s History I decided to post this article because I believe It's important for voters to be informed and make decisions based on what's best for our state and not hate. I hope this information helps someone who hasn't quite ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology