Backdoor Legislation
by HMJC
Last comment by sebekm 3 months, 1 week ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

The Nobama administration continues to employ behind closed doors tactics to degrade our 2nd amendment rights. First it was ammo, and now a direct attack on legitimate businesses further inhibiting the right for law abiding citizens to obtain firearms for personal use and putting Americans out of work.

In a nutshell the government is applying pressure to banking institutions to scrutinize businesses that sell firearms. They have gone as far as to compare firearm transactions with online pornography and internet drug sites. The slant is that they are a high risk client regardless of a proven credit history and legal compliance.

As each "little" under the table legislation continues it further erodes our 2nd amendment rights and make no mistake; the administration is counting on our apathy and refusal to be informed.

Admittedly there are some provisions that need to be looked at however; this should be presented to the people and given the right to be part of the process. As each gun control initiative passes it is going to be an uphill battle to regain these rights.



http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/may/18/targeted-gun-sellers-say-high-risk-label-from-feds/


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/may/18/targeted-gun-sellers-say-high-risk-label-from-feds/


Latest Activity: May 20, 2014 at 9:05 AM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by HMJC
Send HMJC a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (255) times.

PoliticsNation commented on Tuesday, May 20, 2014 at 13:54 PM

Representative Louie Gohmert wants to override commanders and allow service members to openly carry guns on base. This is a bad idea. Help us stop it by dialing 888-907-7125 to connect to your U.S. representative directly and ask them to vote NO on the Gohmert Amendment. Vote happening around 6pm today.

gacpl commented on Tuesday, May 20, 2014 at 14:14 PM

why is it a bad idea to have people trained to handle guns carry them?

HMJC commented on Wednesday, May 21, 2014 at 07:16 AM

Not only trained to use; Soldiers are also trained in levels of force and to include use of deadly force. I will say at least you are consistent PN; that is exactly the type of response I expected from you. Typical DEM approach; bring up another "pressing" situation as opposed to addressing the issue at hand.

sebekm commented on Wednesday, May 21, 2014 at 13:34 PM

HMJC: Yes - it's more "phone and pen" sleight-of-hand at work. It is clearly their intent to erode Constitutional requirements by any regulatory means possible. It was reported yesterday that they're also "picking up the pace" on their executive orders. (I suspect they see the handwriting on the wall that the Senate will change hands in November.) See:

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefin...

Fortunately, as Obama demonstrated in the months after replacing Dubya, his regulations and executive orders can be tossed out the same way he put them in - once we get adult leadership back in the White House. The Dems are also going to regret changing the filibuster rule to a simple majority once the GOP regains control in the Senate.

FYI: While irrelevant to this blog string, it's worthwhile to get the facts straight: the Gohmert amendment was "adopted" by the House on May 18:

http://gohmert.house.gov/news/documen...

and then withdrawn yesterday based on a promise by House leadership that that the proposal would be discussed during conference negotiations with the Senate:

http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action...

sebekm commented on Wednesday, May 21, 2014 at 13:54 PM

"why is it a bad idea to have people trained to handle guns carry them?"

I have a bad feeling about this one. I guess it's based on the idea that especially when you arm people, you are expecting them to act like responsible adults ALL OF THE TIME. I've seen too many squabbles escalate to fist fights and knife fights, and I just wonder what restraint would prevail if those folks were carrying a sidearm.

I don't believe that unlimited "open carry" is a specific provision of the 2nd Amendment, just as nobody in their right mind proposes that mortars, grenade launchers and bazookas should be in the common possession of ordinary citizens. There has to be some common sense somewhere. I haven't seen a single post, camp, base, or station commander come out in favor of what Gohmert proposes, because I'm sure they feel that the risks far outweigh the rewards.

HMJC commented on Wednesday, May 21, 2014 at 14:36 PM

I think they need to look at a hybrid option. Based on past and present events; it makes sense to have more of an armed presence on military installations. This could be in the form of each battalion having their own armed security patrol. Based on events past it would also make sense to have an armed presence at large gathering/servicing areas. In all three occasions; if a armed presence was proximate to the scene; it would have played out more differently. Every Soldier, no. However a more serious approach needs to be formulated to coincide with the reality at hand. It is also important to remember that when Soldiers do deploy; they have a weapon and basic load of ammo at all times so it would not be a be an unfamiliar requirement. Even with all of this said I do concede that a better plan is needed,

sebekm commented on Wednesday, May 21, 2014 at 15:04 PM

HMJC: Reminds me of the "courtesy patrols" I was part of in Germany and at Fort Hood while I was on active duty. Unfortunately, we only carried sticks and were mainly a symbolic presence. But the incidents the patrols were designed to prevent did decrease in frequency, but probably not enough (in my mind) to justify the extra duty I had to pull on top of my normal responsibilities.

Perhaps they should look at NOT downsizing the MPs during this contraction of the armed forces. They could justify it based upon the "hybrid" option you suggest. I'd much rather have a bunch more armed MPs than arming the rank-and-file.


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by HMJC
 
Black Officer Shoots White?Hispanic Teen;
August 26, 2014
White/Hispanic unarmed white young male shot by black police officer. I don't recall the white house making any statements and I wonder if they will send any aides to this young mans funeral. As long as we continue to perpetuate "it's ok he's black" this double standard will continue to ...
Read More »
 
Race Based Hate Crimes are Color Blind
August 20, 2014
As the Ferguson fiasco continues most of the claims have been that the white community is guilty of race based violence and purported inequities. The link below denotes more race based hate crimes primarily against whites. My question is; should the "white" community in DC be rioting and demanding change? ...
Read More »
 
What If???
August 18, 2014
As the Ferguson MO. debacle continues to spiral out of control I have a couple of what if's o What if once all the FACTS are sorted out and it is found that Mr. Brown had culpability that directly contributed to his demise? o What if the raw conversation captured ...
Read More »
 
Abandon Ship...
August 13, 2014
So... Hillary begins the journey of distancing herself from the administration she has steadfastly supported after losing the DEM nomination 6 years ago. She apparently has been openly questioning Nobama's position regarding Syria and his lack of leadership dealing with "Hard Choices" concerning foreign diplomacy. I suspect it will not ...
Read More »
 
MIA
August 08, 2014
It seems that some of the emails regarding the initial failed roll out of the Not So Affordable Act sought by Congress have come up missing. Does this sound familiar to anyone but me?. Secondly; in this day of computer savvy solutions you can almost recover anything to include deleted ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology