[Report Abuse]
[Login to Blog] timeontarget's Blog
Pfizer Corporation Moving to avoid U.S. high tax.
Last comment by HMJC 2 years, 6 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

Pat Buchanan’s latest column tells us what our liberal friends have accomplished with their ever reaching clamor for redistributing the wealth. The thought Buchanan presents makes perfect sense to me and I have copied it here in it’s entirety. I’ll be interested in what the Courier blog site visitors have to say in response.

Here it is:

News that Pfizer, the world’s largest pharmaceutical company, plans to buy Britain’s AstraZeneca for $106 billion, renounce its U.S. citizenship, and declare itself a British company, has jolted Congress.

Pfizer is being denounced as disloyal to the land of its birth, and politicians are devising ways to stop Pfizer from departing.

Yet Pfizer is not alone. Hedge fund managers are urging giant corporations like Walgreens to go nation-shopping for new residences abroad to evade the 35 percent U.S. corporate income tax.

Britain’s corporate income tax is 20 percent, and Pfizer stands to save over $1 billion a year by moving there.

In what are called “inversions,” dozens of U.S. companies have bought up foreign rivals, and then moved abroad to countries with lower tax rates, cutting revenue to the U.S. Treasury.

But Pfizer is far and away the biggest.
The real question, however, is not why companies are fleeing the USA, but why our politicians continue to drive them out of the country.

Consider. Here in America we do not tax charities, churches or colleges. Yet these institutions produce a fraction of the jobs that businesses produce.

If, as a nation, we are committed to “creating jobs,” does it make sense to impose the highest corporate tax rate in the Western world on our biggest and best job creators?

Is this not economic masochism?

Many governors understand that if you want something in your state, you do not drive it out with high taxes. You strengthen the magnet of low taxes.

Florida wants residents of other states to move there and retire there, so it has no income, estate or inheritance tax.

For years, Rep. Jack Kemp urged the creation of enterprise zones in poor communities like Benton Harbor, Michigan, and Harlan County, Kentucky.

Businesses that relocated there would be exempt from corporate income taxes.

Why not make the United States the largest enterprise zone on earth — by abolishing the corporate income tax?

If the corporate income tax were repealed, no U.S. company would think of moving abroad, and every transnational company would think about moving to the USA.

What a message this repeal of the U.S. corporate income tax would send to corporate headquarters worldwide:

Relocate your company or next factory to the USA, keep every dollar of profit you earn, and either reinvest it here or take it home. Your call.

How would America benefit?

Every U.S. company, liberated from its corporate tax burden, would see its profits soar and have more cash on hand for cutting prices, raising wages and salaries, and new investment and hires.

And every company that relocated here would create new U.S. jobs.

This would be a stimulus package to end all stimulus packages.

Isn’t this what we all want?

Or are we not willing to create jobs here if the means of doing so conflict with redistributionist ideology?

Consider the other benefits of abolishing the corporate tax.

Corporate lobbyists, who spend their days walking Capitol Hill corridors seeking tax breaks, and their evenings at fundraisers handing $1,000 checks to congressmen who can create tax loopholes — in a form of legalized corruption and glorified bribery, could be put out to pasture.

Armies of tax lawyers, accountants and IRS agents could be shifted to more productive work.

Companies could focus full time on creating new wealth, not finding ways to keep what they have earned.

Many politicians seem to think the corporate tax punishes the rich and powerful and is an indispensable weapon in reducing inequality and redistributing wealth.

This is neosocialist myth.

As Ronald Reagan used to say, corporations don’t pay taxes, people do.

The billions in corporate income taxes paid by Wal-Mart and McDonald’s come out of the dollars spent by consumers who shop at Wal-Mart’s and eat at McDonald’s.

Where else does Ford Motor get the money to pay its corporate income tax, if not from dollars spent by Middle Americans on Ford cars and trucks?

Middle America pays the corporate income tax.

How could we make up for the lost revenue to government?

Simple. The corporate income tax last year produced $273 billion, less than a tenth of federal revenue.

Imports, which kill U.S. jobs and subtract from GDP, totaled $2.7 trillion last year.

Put a 10 percent tariff on imports, and the abolition of the U.S. corporate income tax becomes a revenue-neutral proposal.

Looking back, consider what our political class has done to our once self-sufficient American Republic.

We impose on businesses, our principal job creators, the most punitive corporate tax rate in the West.

Through “free trade,” we tell U.S. companies that if they wish to avoid our taxes and get around our minimum wage, health, safety, and environmental laws, they can move to China, produce there, and bring their products back free of charge — and kill their competitors too patriotic to leave America.

“The Decline and Fall of the United States of America” is going to a piece of cake for future historians to write.

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of “Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?”


Latest Activity: May 14, 2014 at 6:33 AM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by timeontarget
Send timeontarget a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (905) times.

gacpl commented on Wednesday, May 14, 2014 at 07:29 AM

for Pfizer it's not just corporate tax, obama care just added more tax on anything medical. all the supplys that they use now cost more. they will move their manufacturing over seas next to avoid all obama care tax.

HMJC commented on Wednesday, May 14, 2014 at 10:44 AM

As much as we complain about corporations taking jobs and products overs; you would think we would provide perks for companies that stayed in America.

The self proclaimed "Robin Hood" mentality of taking from the rich and giving to the poor is tiresome. The "rich" cannot independently be considered the primary goal that will restore/repair the economy.

I would be interested what the deficit is for Americans and Aliens that do not pay taxes. I venture to say this statistic coupled with the myriad of tax breaks received would be a significant amount. I have a novel idea... How about we focus on the 56% that don't pay income taxes are looked at a little harder and start to recoup some of those monies. There doesn't need to be a new and improved approach; we need to analyze our own systems of checks and balances and "balance the books" before we insist that Corporate America needs to pick p the tab


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by timeontarget
 
Local Republicans/NAACP at odds
December 02, 2016
Local Republicans, NAACP at odds over election Liberty Republican Party questioning NAACP members serving as poll watchers By Tiffany King Coastal Courier Staff writer and Managing Editor of Liberty Life Magazine tking@coastalcourier.com POSTED: November 30, 2016 5:00 a.m. Local Republicans, NAACP at odds over election View Larger The local Republican ...
Read More »
 
Stats you'll never see on mainstream media
December 02, 2016
Intellectuals can give all kinds of ideas, which may sound ok but are not practical in terms of implementation. They hide in academia, and are seldom touched by the real world. Amazing stats Make sure you read to the bottom... An eye opener! (Or should be!) 1. California New Mexico ...
Read More »
 
A good critique of Trump
November 28, 2016
We want to share Min Gloria Brown's letter to the editor (published in Sunday's Coastal Courier) Together we can all Make America Great Agian. Minister Brown's letter///////////////////////////////////// ///////////////////////////////////// Editor: I believe I finally have some insight into the shocking 2016 Presidential election results: Donald J. Trump is a master strategist! ...
Read More »
 
Buchanan/America First Trump Trade Policy
November 26, 2016
An 'America First' Trump Trade Policy By Patrick J. Buchanan Friday - November 25, 2016 Donald Trump's election triumph is among the more astonishing in history. Yet if he wishes to become the father of a new "America First" majority party, he must make good on his solemn promise: To ...
Read More »
 
Trump’s media feud enters new era
November 25, 2016
“You’ve asked me eight times the same question,” Spicer shouted. “It’s the news media over and over again," Spicer said. "But I don’t know how many times he has to answer that question and you figuring out the way and fashion he should do it next. If he gives a ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology