Profiles In Leadership
"I Don't Mind A Parasite. I Object To A Cut-Rate One."
Last comment by sebekm 2 months, 2 weeks ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form


Recently, the Roman Catholic church canonized two 20th Century popes. One of these was Pope John Paul II. In addition to surviving attempted assassination, Pope John Paul II was widely acclaimed for helping to end Communist rule in his native Poland (and eventually all of Europe) and significantly improving the Catholic Church's relations with Judaism, Islam, the Eastern Orthodox Church, and the Anglican Communion.

A Wall Street Journal Opinion piece published last Friday contrasts the leadership style and ability of Pope John Paul II (a.k.a. Saint John Paul the Great) with that of the current leader of the free world and President of the United States - Barack Obama. Here is that contrast in its entirety:

"Apathy in the Executive

John Paul II and Obama: a study in leadership contrasts

Rome

Friends and I kept seeing groups of Poles who'd taken planes or 20-hour bus rides to be here for the canonization of John Paul II. They did not look wealthy. A lot of them wouldn't have had tickets to the big Mass because the Vatican kept saying there were no tickets. (In fact there were, and they were thoughtfully color-coded.) A lot of them knew they'd spend a rainy night on the floor of a church or, some of them, wrapped in plastic parkas as they slept on the street on yoga mats they carried on their backpacks. Many would watch the proceedings on a Jumbotron in a piazza far from St. Peter's. They didn't care. They came anyway because they loved him. He was enmeshed in their lives, and whether they'd known him or not they felt enmeshed in his. Lech Walesa, at an American reception, seemed to speak for them when I asked how he felt to see his old friend elevated. "I feel I will have a friend in Heaven to greet me if I get there," he said.

In the days before and after the canonization, I couldn't help reflect on what a leader is, and how it is that great leaders engender gratitude, loyalty and love.

You have to stand for something. You have to suffer for it. (John Paul was shot and almost killed, and he spent the last third of his pontificate in constant physical distress. He kept showing up anyway.) You have to be brave. (He wasn't afraid of any earthly power, not even the Soviet Union.) You have to stand by your beliefs as long as you know they are right; you have to speak and write the truth. Explaining what you believe involves trusting people to hear and consider; it assumes they will respond fairly and even with their highest selves. In this way you develop a relationship with people, an ongoing conversation between your articulations and their private thoughts. You are talking to them. When eventually they respond, they are talking to you.

Great leaders are clear, honest, suffer for their stands and are brave. They conduct a constant dialogue. At the end, when they are gone, the crowd declares what they heard. When John Paul died, they issued their judgment: He was a saint.

Popes aren't presidents, and presidents aren't saints. Both operate within wildly different realities and have wholly different obligations, so to compare the two isn't quite just. And yet I couldn't help think the past week of President Obama, whom I started to think of as poor Obama—whose failings as a leader are now so apparent, and seem so irremediable, partly because they spring from not only his nature and personality but his misunderstanding of what leaders do.

Does he stand for something? I suppose he stands for many things, but you can't quite narrow it down and sum it up. A problem with his leadership is that there's always the sense that he's not quite telling you his core and motivating beliefs. There are a lot of rounded banalities. There are sentiments and impulses. But he isn't stark, doesn't vividly cut through. There's a sense he's telling people as much as he feels he can within the parameters of political safety, and no more.

As for speaking truthfully, well, he speaks, in many venues and sometimes at great length. But rather than persuade the other side, he knocks down a lot of straw men and deploys no affection or regard for those who disagree with him. He says the great signature program of his presidency will do one thing and it turns out to do another. He is evasive about Benghazi and the other scandals. He winds up with polls showing Americans do not see him as a truth teller. That's treacherous for a leader. People give politicians a lot of leeway because they think so little of them. But they don't like it when they're being played.

Is he brave? Well, he can take a punch. He's not afraid to be foolhardy, either in statements about red lines or in the U.S. role in Libya. But he seems increasingly passive. He is not passive when it comes to his political fortunes—he goes out and speaks and tries to rally the base—but even there, and certainly when it comes to governing, he seems bored, as if operating at a remove. Valerie Jarrett was once quoted saying he's so exceptionally gifted that he's been bored most of his life. It seems to me more likely an exceptionally gifted person would be exceptionally interested in and alive to the wonder and drama of things. I think her meaning was that only the most demanding and important of jobs would consistently arouse his engagement and focus. But he seems pretty bored as president.

He's not a dynamist. He doesn't seem excited about all the possibilities for America.

To be in Europe is to realize, again and at first hand, that America has experienced a status shift. Europeans know we are powerful—we have the most drones and bombs and magic robot soldiers—but they don't think we are strong. They've seen our culture; we exported it. The Internet destroyed our ability to keep under wraps, at least for a while, our embarrassments. People everywhere read of our daily crimes and governmental scandals. The people of old Europe thought we were great not only because we were wealthy but because we were good. We don't seem so good now. And they know we're not as wealthy as we were.

In these circumstances it would be quite wonderful to have a leader who is a deeply believing enthusiast who could tell the world—and us—that we can, and will, turn it all around.

Pollsters always say a politician has to project optimism. I think what they have to project is belief, and when people see it they appreciate it and become more optimistic. Does Mr. Obama project belief? Or does he project something more like doubt, or inertia? How wonderful it would be to see an American president appreciate all the possibilities of becoming a great energy-producing nation—all the new technologies and jobs, all the rebound they'd bring. To have a leader who feels and conveys a palpable joy in the transformative nature of this new world. Instead what we see is a ticket-checking approval, coupled with a wary, base-pandering, foot-dragging series of decisions such as the latest delay of the Keystone pipeline. It looks like a kind of historical lethargy, or listlessness.

The aspect of the presidency he seems to enjoy most is the perks—the splashy vacations, the planes, the hoops, the golf. When his presidency is over there will be the perks of the post-presidency—foundations, libraries, million-dollar speeches, staff, protection. A literary agent estimated he'll get up to $20 million for his memoirs, Michelle Obama perhaps $12 million.

So no, you don't get the impression he'll have to suffer for where he stands, or who he is."

See: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304677904579536170749456890


"He doesn't seem excited about all the possibilities for America."

Above all else, this is what separates Obama from prior "charismatic" presidents - especially Ronald Reagan, JFK and FDR. Those three were inspirational and transformational (albeit JFK's time was too short). Regardless of how good or bad things were in the country, while those three were in office the American people as a whole were confident that their President was always looking for ways to reach for the stars.

The exact opposite was emphasized in 2008 by President Obama's First Lady when she said in a speech she that she hadn't been proud of her country in her adult lifetime. This type of overt pessimism - and we can assume that Mr. Obama agrees with her statement since he didn't condemn it - destroys any potential excitement "about all the possibilities for America." This sentiment does the American people - ALL constituencies - a great disservice.

For me, November 2016 can't get here soon enough. We need to get back on the road to unity and harmony in this country. After five+ years, it is painfully obvious that we'll never get there with this president. Leadership is an essential skill and art. Either you have it or you don't. Hopefully the next president - Democrat or Republican - has it, and can move us FORWARD as a country instead of backwards.


Latest Activity: May 07, 2014 at 3:34 PM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by sebekm
Send sebekm a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (336) times.

timeontarget commented on Friday, May 09, 2014 at 12:40 PM

Excellent piece thanks for posting it. Brings to mind something from a recent piece on another source The Personal Liberty Digest. I've attached it here.

"Remember when Obama leaned over and whispered to the President of Russia that after his re-election he’d have “more flexibility” to help out Putin? Don’t look now, but it’s happening exactly as Obama whispered. I’m just surprised he didn’t whisper in Russian.

It seems every country in the world has been badly damaged by the policies of Obama — except Russia and China. Our decline is their shining moment. Suddenly, the world is Putin’s oyster. Suddenly, our military is a feckless joke, incapable of stopping Russia’s expansion plans. Suddenly, our obsession with green energy allows Russia’s economy to soar with energy revenues. Suddenly, our economy is stuck in reverse, while China’s economy explodes. Coincidence?

Funny how all this worked out. Makes you think, doesn’t it?

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty."

Sebekm please continue some of us read and consider your blog posts.
Timeontarget

sebekm commented on Monday, May 12, 2014 at 13:43 PM

Thanks. Have been occupied with family medical issues and "home site beautification" lately. (And the NFL draft is one of my annual favorites.) Hopefully things will settle down and I can visit the site more often.


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by sebekm
 
Obama’s “Legislative” Strategy
July 30, 2014
According to our Constitution, the Congress is supposed to MAKE the laws; the President is supposed to “faithfully EXECUTE” the laws, and the Judiciary is supposed to INTERPRET the laws (in a constitutional and legislative context). But now comes our President who believes his oath of office is not to ...
Read More »
 
GOP On Track To Win Majority In U.S. Senate
July 30, 2014
That’s the consensus of several recent news articles – as well as a recent New York Times/CBS News/YouGov poll. For you political junkies (like me), here’s the analysis in detail: *As pointed out in the article at weeklystandard.com, titled: “NYT Poll: Signs Point to GOP Majority in Senate”: “If the ...
Read More »
 
In Case You Missed It……
July 29, 2014
….here are some items of interest from last week’s political headlines: *Let’s Go Polling --As reported by Yahoo News: “If a rematch of the 2012 presidential election were held today, Mitt Romney would win the popular vote over President Barack Obama, a new CNN/ORC International poll finds. Romney, who lost ...
Read More »
 
Speaking Of Polls....
July 23, 2014
….according to an article posted a short while ago in the Washington Examiner: “Survey: Fewer than 1 in 5 better off because of Obamacare; many more worse off Eighteen percent of Americans, or fewer than one in five, say they or someone in their family is better off because of ...
Read More »
 
Lost Emails/Hard Drives Plague Obama Admin
July 20, 2014
Here’s further proof that the Obama administration STILL isn’t taking IRS-Gate seriously. As reported last week in an exclusive by Larry O'Connor of the Independent Journal Review: “Group At Center Of IRS Scandal Has Never Been Interviewed By FBI Investigators No one from True The Vote, the highest profile organization ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology