[Report Abuse]
[Login to Blog] Funkentelecky's Blog
Obamacare: Abuse of Power Endangers Nations Health
SFC (RET) U.S. Army Combat Veteran, Patriot, Conservative
Last comment by Funkentelecky 3 years, 6 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

When liberal pro-Obama scholars question the legality of President Barack Obama’s actions to implement Obamacare, the issue of illegal presidential use of power moves from partisan to frightening.

George Washington Law School's Jonathan Turley is the second most quoted law professor in the nation and a two-time Obama voter. He recently testified before Congress on Obama's extensive use of executive orders and administrative actions to make unilateral changes in Obamacare, immigration policy, minimum wage and the IRS qualifying standards for non-profit status.

As to Obamacare, Obama, so far, changed it in at least a dozen major ways, including, but not limited to, postponing the employer mandate, allowing insurance carriers to let their insured keep an old policy, and, more recently, redefining the Obamacare "hardship" exemption so broadly as to nullify the individual mandate for at least two more years.

Was this legal?

Turley said: “President Obama has repeatedly violated this (separation of powers) doctrine in the circumvention of Congress in areas ranging from health care to immigration law to environmental law. We are in the midst of a constitutional crisis with sweeping implications for our system of government. …” We are now at the constitutional tipping point for our system.”

Turley challenged Congress to re-assert its authority. “If balance is to be reestablished,” he said, “it must begin before this President leaves office and that will likely require every possible means to reassert legislative authority. No one in our system can ‘go it alone’ -- not Congress, not the courts, and not the President.”

Obama sold Obamacare with many now-broken promises. Saving costs was a big one. In 2009, the Congressional Budget Office set the net cost of Obamacare at $599 billion over 10 years -- citing a gross cost of $848 billion less $249 billion in tax revenues and other cost savings. But recently the CBO revised the 10-year price tag to more than $2 trillion.

Economist Jonathan Gruber, the father of Romneycare -- which was the template for Obamacare -- recently admitted that well, no, costs will not be going down. “Covering people with health insurance doesn't save money," said Gruber. “That was sometimes a misleading motivator for the Affordable Care Act. The law isn't designed to save money. It's designed to improve health, and that's going to cost money."

So, Obamacare won’t save money, but at least those too poor to afford health insurance will now lead healthier lives, right? Not necessarily.

Oregon expanded its Medicaid program years ago -- the way Obamacare does now -- to include some of Oregon's low-income uninsured. Because of costs, Oregon did this on a random lottery basis. Some got it, some, unfortunately, wanted to but couldn’t. But this allows comparisons. Oregon, for example, can now compare the health outcomes of the now-insured Oregonians against those who wanted to get insurance, but couldn't. Surely, the now-insured are healthier compared to those without health insurance.

But there were no significant differences in their health care outcomes. While the newly insured did increase their doctor visits for preventative and primary-care services, some could not get appointments with doctors, many of whom wouldn't take new Medicaid patients. Emergency room use went up 40 percent among the new Medicaid patients, not down -- all for non-emergency medical needs. Forbes health care researcher Avik Roy writes, "The result calls into question the $450 billion a year we spend on Medicaid, and the fact that Obamacare throws 11 million more Americans into this broken program.”


Worse, the uninsured dislike Obamacare even more than do those with health insurance. A recent Kaiser Health poll found that among the uninsured, only 22 percent have a favorable attitude toward Obamacare, a far-lower percentage than the 56 percent of uninsured who are unfavorable toward Obamacare.

Before Obama became president, he said if he were “starting from scratch,” he’d go with a single-payer system. A few months ago, Democratic Senate leader Harry Reid was asked whether Obamacare would lead us to single-payer. Reid said, "Absolutely." This is the real plan.


Single-payer is universal healthcare system used in Canada. It remains popular. But in 2009, the incoming president of the Canadian Medical Association said: “(Canadian doctors) all agree that the system is imploding. We all agree that things are more precarious than perhaps Canadians realize.” What did the outgoing CMA president propose? He said: "A health care revolution has passed us by” and “competition should be welcomed, not feared." So while the Canadian Medical Association urges more competition and privatization, America moves toward even more government involvement in health care.


In the annual index of countries rated on "economic freedom," the United States -- since 2008 -- has slipped from the number 5 position to 12th. Canada -- at number 6 -- is now more "economically free" than the United States! Economic freedom and prosperity go hand in hand.

Yet this administration makes it clear it is more interested in wealth re-distribution and less interested in wealth creation. President Obama is quite adept at the former -- clueless about how to achieve the latter.


http://www.larryelder.com/b/Obamacare:-Abuse-of-Power-Endangers-the-Nations-Health/31969583623442600.html



Latest Activity: Mar 27, 2014 at 12:28 PM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by Funkentelecky
Send Funkentelecky a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (616) times.

Funkentelecky commented on Thursday, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:48 PM

I was wondering if Obamacare is better than what we had before, why isn't the Obama administration tooting its horn, by bragging about great number of enrollee citizens that have actually been signed up for insurance and why does he keep breaking the law instead of going through congress. Don't forget some of the go it alone tactics were proposed by Republicans through legislation and Obama threatened to veto it, but it never would have passed in the Senate because of Harry Reid. Is Obama the new "King James and are the Democrats obstructionist for not compromising through the proper channels through legislation?

...and another thing edition number 68 with some very inquisitive information for all.

http://www.larryelder.com/site

Funkentelecky commented on Tuesday, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:34 AM

Jimmy, just being real and sticking to the facts. The only way to actually determine that the numbers are real is to answer the 5 questions that were posted in PN's blog. From the Obama's administrations track record on telling us the truth, any horn tooting is just political bipartisanship sir!


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by Funkentelecky
 
It's Official: Democrats Are The Extremists Today
October 17, 2017
Partisanship: Everyone knows that the country is more politically polarized than ever, but most don't know why. Data from the highly respected Pew Research Center provides a definitive answer. It's because Democrats have moved sharply to the extreme left. The Pew report — titled "The Partisan Divide on Political Values ...
Read More »
 
Trump Was Right to End Unconstitutional Obamacare
October 13, 2017
Trump Was Right to End Unconstitutional Obamacare Subsidies By David French They were never lawful because Congress never appropriated the money. It’s a sad sign of our times that the constitutionality of any given government action is now seen as a wholly secondary consideration, subordinate to politics and arguments about ...
Read More »
 
I’m mad as hell and I’m not taking it anymore
October 07, 2017
Black America is wrong to blame white racism for woes By L. Todd Wood I know of no white person alive today in the United States who has ever legally owned a black slave, or any slave for that matter. Almost 700,000 mostly white men died 160 years ago to ...
Read More »
 
The National Anthem Protests: Do Facts Matter?
October 01, 2017
Where was the angry left when Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg called the national anthem protests "dumb and disrespectful"? Let's focus on the "dumb" part. NFL player Colin Kaepernick, who started the protests, did so over the supposed widespread instances of police brutality against blacks. Kaepernick said, "I am ...
Read More »
 
Modern Liberalism’s False Obsession With Civil War
September 17, 2017
Modern Liberalism’s False Obsession With Civil War Monuments By Jason L. Riley Black accomplishments in the ’40s and ’50s prove that today’s setbacks are not due to slavery. Visit the American Museum of Natural History in New York City, and between exhibits of dinosaur skeletons, Asian elephants and Alaskan moose ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology