[Report Abuse]
[Login to Blog] timeontarget's Blog
Patrick J. Buchanan
Last comment by Ted Harris 3 years, 10 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

By: Patrick J. Buchanan
2/11/2014 06:00 AM

RESIZE: AAA
PRINT



27
The Congressional Budget Office did not exactly say Obamacare would cost the nation 2.5 million jobs.

But what it did say is vindication of what conservatives have preached since Barry Goldwater stood in the pulpit 50 years ago:


The more liberal the welfare state, the greater the disincentive to work and the more ruinous the impact upon a nation’s work ethic.

The CBO has just given us a statistical measure of that truth.

The Obamacare subsidies, it said, will cause some to quit work, others to cut back on the hours they work, and others to hold off going to work, so as not to lose the benefits.

The cumulative impact of all these decisions will be equal to the loss of 2.5 million jobs by 2024. A devastating blow to an economy where the labor force participation is at a 30-year low.

The CBO has put a number of what everyone knows to be true: If people don’t have to work to provide the needs of their daily lives, some will drop out and become permanent charges on the public purse, deadbeats.

The father of modern liberalism, FDR, never disputed this. As he warned in 1935, welfare is “a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit.”

This used to be called common sense. Growing up, we all knew or read that those who inherited great wealth often ended up never holding a “real job” and spent their days in a life of self-indulgence.

However, a related and larger question is raised by the CBO:

If Obamacare alone will cost the equivalent of 2.5 million lost jobs to the U.S. economy, what is the impact of our entire welfare state on the vitality and dynamism of the U.S. labor force?

As Robert Rector of Heritage Foundation wrote in January, if we judge Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society only by the dollars spent to improve the lives of the poor and near-poor, an astronomical $20 trillion, it was a success. Rector describes its dimensions.

“The federal government runs more than 80-means tested programs that provide cash, food, housing, medical care and targeted social services to poor and low-income Americans.

“Government spent $916 billion on these programs in 2012 alone, and roughly 100 million Americans received aid from at least one of them, at an average cost of $9,000 per recipient. (That figure doesn’t include Security or Medicare.)

“Federal and state welfare spending, adjusted for inflation, is 16 times greater than it was in 1964.”

Yet, if we judge the Great Society by its goal, providing the poor with their basic family needs so they can go out into the marketplace and find jobs and join their fellow Americans, it has been, writes Rector, “a catastrophe.”

Scores of millions of Americans are today less able to achieve self-sufficiency through work than were their grandparents.

And by providing for all the needs that the father used to provide for his family, the Great Society has helped make fathers superfluous. We have created a system where a teenage girl who becomes pregnant can have all her basic needs met by government.

This is a primary cause of the rise in illegitimacy in America from 6 percent of all births in 1963 to 41 percent today, and to 53 percent among Hispanics and 73 percent among African-Americans.

And that record illegitimacy rate is directly tied to the drug use rate, the dropout rate, the crime rate and the incarceration rate.

If the goal of the Great Society was to turn America’s tax consumers into taxpayers, it has been a total failure. We have now a vast underclass of scores of millions who are dependent upon government for most or all of their basic needs, a class among whom many, if not most, have lost the ability to survive without government money, food and shelter.

This is something new in America, something we did not know with the Irish boat people of the 1840s, the Okies in Dust Bowl days or during the Great Depression of the 1930s.

Monday’s New York Times reveals a relevant and startling fact.

Only 8 percent of the cab and rental car drivers in New York City are native-born Americans. Three times as many yellow cabdrivers in New York were born in Bangladesh than in the USA.

What is happening in America is that the vast cohort of working men and women, immigrants, illegal and legal, who have come in recent decades, 30 to 40 million, have displaced, have dispossessed, the native-born.

But we may be coming to the end of the line. From Detroit to Greece to Puerto Rico, government’s ability to expand the benefits of the welfare class by taxing the working and middle class is reaching its limit.

Taxpayers are rebelling, budgets are falling dangerously out of balance, and the welfare state is beginning to buckle under the load.

Perhaps T. S. Eliot was right:

“This is how the world ends/Not with a bang but a whimper.”

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of “Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?”


Latest Activity: Feb 11, 2014 at 6:40 PM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by timeontarget
Send timeontarget a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (760) times.

timeontarget commented on Wednesday, Feb 12, 2014 at 08:32 AM

You are correct I believe.

However you are attacking the messenger not the message.

If people don’t have to work to provide the needs of their daily lives, some will drop out and become permanent charges on the public purse, deadbeats.

The father of modern liberalism, FDR, never disputed this. As he warned in 1935, welfare is “a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit.”

timeontarget commented on Wednesday, Feb 12, 2014 at 08:36 AM

I'm not trying to be disagreeable I'm just disagreeing.

Thanks for reading the blog.

I've always admired Pat Buchanan as a gifted writer. He is a fairly good speaker also.

IMHO

Ted Harris commented on Wednesday, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:02 AM

Good Morning TOT and Jimmy Mack. You guys are so 1990's. I was on a talk radio show during the David Duke days. I said the Republican Party treated David Duke so bad that he could star in a remake of the old movie "Black like Me" You should have seen the telephone lines light up. It brought a chuckle to me today.

PoliticsNation commented on Wednesday, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:35 AM

I was born and raised in Louisiana. I know all about David Duke/Grand Wizard..the people of North Louisiana fought hard to get him out of office.

timeontarget commented on Wednesday, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:51 PM

Ted I appreciate your comment. I took it to mean that even back then you did not think there was a place for David Duke in the Republican Party.

I never felt like there was a place for Duke in the Southern Republican uprising.

I've always thought that the Republican Party in the old South circa 1964 was nothing more than the youth of OLD SOUTHERN DEMOCRATS such as myself.

PoliticsNation thanks for commenting.
I don't know much about Louisiana but I've always felt it lagged behind the rest of the deep South in accepting integration.

timeontarget commented on Friday, Feb 14, 2014 at 07:07 AM

Maybe he doesn't check his mail on this site.

How does one get mail on this site?

Please give me some instructions.

Ted Harris commented on Friday, Feb 14, 2014 at 09:48 AM

I apologize to all for my failure to respond in a timely manner. In regards to the David Duke days, what I was trying to say basically that he was blacklisted by the Republican Party. They didnt want David Duke involved in the presidential debates.

1964 was the first time I watched the National Conventions of the Republican and Democratic party. Being born in the South and raised in the North the local people used to call us "Rockefeller Children" because we had health insurance. It was the first time I saw New York Governor Nelson D. Rockefeller.

JimmyMack I hope you will forgive me I have the upmost respect for you and agree with you on many issues.


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by timeontarget
 
Sheriff's Letter to Editor/HMJC"s Blog
December 11, 2017
We have copied both Sheriff Sikes letter to the editor and HMJC's blog regarding the letter. Our fellow blogger Brother Rice unknowingly relegated HMJC's blog down the blog site with a series of blogs Friday night or Saturday. HMJC made some charges against Sheriff Sikes and we all need to ...
Read More »
 
More on Moore Romney/Bannon
December 07, 2017
‘Do Not Talk to Me About Honor and Integrity!’ Steve Bannon Savages Entire Romney Clan After Mitt’s Insult to Vietnam Vet Roy Moore 24524 Bannon for MooreGetty Image by IAN MASON5 Dec 2017Fairhope, AL7,878 Breitbart News Executive Chairman Stephen K. Bannon unleashed a stream of indignation at failed presidential candidate ...
Read More »
 
The truth about Roy Moore
December 06, 2017
JERRY SEINFELD ENDORSES ROY MOORE? December 6, 2017 Apparently, the GOP is now the party of CHILD MOLESTATION! At least the media tell me that's the meaning of President Trump's endorsement of Senate candidate Roy Moore. Are we allowed to mention that Moore denies the charges? It's hard to disprove ...
Read More »
 
Buchanan/Is Flynn's Defection a Death Blow?
December 05, 2017
Is Flynn's Defection a Death Blow? By Patrick J. Buchanan Tuesday - December 5, 2017 Why did Gen. Mike Flynn lie to the FBI about his December 2016 conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak? Why did he not tell the FBI the truth? As national security adviser to the president-elect, ...
Read More »
 
Coulter/Sex in America/Part 2
November 29, 2017
SEX IN AMERICA, PART 2 November 29, 2017 At least liberals are finally telling the truth about Bill Clinton -- and just 20 years after it mattered! Of course, considering it took the Democratic Party a century to discover that slavery was wrong, two decades is lightning speed for these ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology