Democrats Losing Union Support Due To ObamaCare
"I Don't Mind A Parasite. I Object To A Cut-Rate One."
Last comment by sebekm 9 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form


That’s the gist of a washingtonpost.com article posted last Friday titled: “Labor union officials say Obama betrayed them in health-care rollout.” And how were they betrayed? They say due to the “unintended consequences” of ObamaCare and the arrogant attitude of Mr. Obama toward their health care concerns. Why does this matter? Because labor unions and their huge memberships have historically been significant constituencies of the Democratic Party. When the unions are unhappy - in this case some seem to be hopping mad – they don’t enthusiastically turn out the vote and may even support opposition candidates.

Said one prominent labor president:

““We want to hold the president to his word: If you like your health-care coverage, you can keep it, and that just hasn’t been the case,” said Donald “D.” Taylor, president of Unite Here, the union that represents about 400,000 hotel and restaurant workers and provided a crucial boost to Obama by endorsing him just after his rival Hillary Rodham Clinton had won the New Hampshire primary.”

“You can’t just order people to do stuff,” Taylor said. “If their health plan gets wrecked, why would they then go campaign for the folks responsible for wrecking their health care?”

Why would they, indeed. Here are some other highlights of the article:

*”Labor leaders who have spent months lobbying unsuccessfully for special protections under the Affordable Care Act warned this week that the White House’s continued refusal to help is dampening union support for Democratic candidates in this year’s midterm elections.

*”Leaders of two major unions, including the first to endorse Obama in 2008, said they have been betrayed by an administration that wooed their support for the 2009 legislation with promises to later address the peculiar needs of union-negotiated insurance plans that cover millions of workers.”

*”Their complaints reflect a broad sense of disappointment among many labor leaders, who say the Affordable Care Act has subjected union health plans to new taxes and mandates while not allowing them to share in the subsidies that have gone to private insurance companies competing on the newly created exchanges.”

*”After dozens of frustrating meetings with White House officials over the past year, including one with Obama, a number of angry labor officials say their members are far less likely to campaign and turn out for Democratic candidates in the midterm elections.”

*”Taylor and Terry O’Sullivan, president of the Laborers’ International Union of North America, laid out their grievances this week in a terse letter to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.), saying they are “bitterly disappointed” in the administration.”

*”A White House spokeswoman declined to comment on the union leaders’ claims that they were misled. A person familiar with Obama’s meeting with the labor chiefs said he “listened to the group’s concerns with empathy” but explained that the law would not permit the administration to take the steps they requested.”

*”But in the letter to Reid and Pelosi, O’Sullivan and Taylor wrote, “If the administration honestly thinks that these proposed rules are responsive to our concerns, they were not listening or they simply did not care.””

*”The rejections by the White House follow previous disappointments for the labor movement, which poured money into pro-Obama campaigns in 2008 and 2012 and deployed millions of grass-roots volunteers motivated largely by their support for Obama’s push to bring about near-universal health insurance. Another major goal of the labor movement — card-check legislation to make it easier for workers to form unions — failed to win support after what many labor officials thought was a lackluster effort by the White House.”

*”Union officials expect the health-care controversy to intensify a raging debate within the labor movement over how deeply labor should invest in Democratic Party candidates.”

*”Taylor said Unite Here officials have met with White House officials 48 times. At the time the health-care bill was being considered, he said, “we were told that ‘if there were problems, don’t worry, we’ll get them fixed.’ ”

“We thought that if we made the case to the agencies dealing with regulations to correct problems that hurt, really destroy, self-funded nonprofit health plans, it would be resolved,” Taylor said. “That clearly was naive or stupid.”

For the entire article, see: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/labor-union-officials-say-obama-betrayed-them-in-health-care-rollout/2014/01/31/2cda6afc-8789-11e3-833c-33098f9e5267_story.html

The action the unions want cannot be accomplished “by a pen and a phone,” so they shouldn’t expect to get any relief that way. And now they say they feel “naïve or stupid.” At the very least they believe they were “misled” (translation: LIED TO) and “betrayed.” Sound familiar? It does to me – as my own family members “liked their health plan” but have found out they couldn’t keep it.

The developments reported in this article further illustrate that support for ObamaCare – and the political party that foisted it on the American people – continues to crumble as we approach the 2014 mid-term campaign season. This can only mean good news for the Republicans.


Latest Activity: Feb 02, 2014 at 12:45 PM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by sebekm
Send sebekm a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (323) times.

Funkentelecky commented on Sunday, Feb 02, 2014 at 13:51 PM

Remember Nancy Pelosi’s statement in 2010 “We need to pass it to know what’s in it” That was addressed to all back in the day and was stupid to say for anyone and this came from the Speaker of the House #3 behind Obama and Biden.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFROl-...

Now let me answer the question for her, healthcare should have been run through the free market instead of government, take a look at Amazon and Apple. In the free market services may start off expensive but they get better and improve over a short period of time. Government services are proposed at reasonable prices but never make the mark and usually costs double to triple the proposed amount. Also if the Feds are running it who’s going to protect our rights when it hits the fan?

sebekm commented on Sunday, Feb 02, 2014 at 14:00 PM

Amen. That's the problem ANY TIME the government thinks they have all the answers and cuts the rest of the nation - and the free market - out of the process. A child of eight could have seen it coming in 2009 - as indicated by some of those "children" of the GOP who tried to sound the alarm back them. They were ignored and demonized - and look where we are today: EXACTLY WHERE THEY SAID WE WOULD BE.


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by sebekm
 
Political Potpourri
August 13, 2014
As they say on Bret Baier’s “Special Report” program, “here are a few pickings from the political grapevine”: *It appears that the media is finally beginning to turn and get tough on President Obama. Last week the Washington Post – liberal bastion and investigator of all things Republican – chose ...
Read More »
 
ObamaCare Update
August 13, 2014
In case you missed them – here are a few headlines regarding ObamaCare from earlier this month: *”Barney Frank: They “Just Lied to People” About ObamaCare That’s right – Barney Frank, Democrat and former long-term congressman FINALLY made this admission in a recent interview with the Huffington Post: “The rollout ...
Read More »
 
Want To Have The (Absolute) Last Word……
August 06, 2014
…and have some fun with it? Write your own obituary and make it humorous and self-deprecating. That’s what Kevin McGroarty did. He wrote it when he knew the end was near, and all the newspaper had to do was fill in the date. Here it is: “Obituary Kevin J. McGroarty ...
Read More »
 
One Reason Our “Do Nothing Congress” Does Nothing
August 06, 2014
Much has been said about GOP “obstructionism” – particularly as it relates to President Obama’s liberal agenda. It’s clear that as far as Republicans are concerned, President Obama NEEDS to be obstructed. But little has been said or written about Democrat “obstructionism.” Yes – that definitely exists as well, and ...
Read More »
 
Obama’s “Legislative” Strategy
July 30, 2014
According to our Constitution, the Congress is supposed to MAKE the laws; the President is supposed to “faithfully EXECUTE” the laws, and the Judiciary is supposed to INTERPRET the laws (in a constitutional and legislative context). But now comes our President who believes his oath of office is not to ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology