Democrats Losing Union Support Due To ObamaCare
"I Don't Mind A Parasite. I Object To A Cut-Rate One."
Last comment by sebekm 5 months, 3 weeks ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

That’s the gist of a article posted last Friday titled: “Labor union officials say Obama betrayed them in health-care rollout.” And how were they betrayed? They say due to the “unintended consequences” of ObamaCare and the arrogant attitude of Mr. Obama toward their health care concerns. Why does this matter? Because labor unions and their huge memberships have historically been significant constituencies of the Democratic Party. When the unions are unhappy - in this case some seem to be hopping mad – they don’t enthusiastically turn out the vote and may even support opposition candidates.

Said one prominent labor president:

““We want to hold the president to his word: If you like your health-care coverage, you can keep it, and that just hasn’t been the case,” said Donald “D.” Taylor, president of Unite Here, the union that represents about 400,000 hotel and restaurant workers and provided a crucial boost to Obama by endorsing him just after his rival Hillary Rodham Clinton had won the New Hampshire primary.”

“You can’t just order people to do stuff,” Taylor said. “If their health plan gets wrecked, why would they then go campaign for the folks responsible for wrecking their health care?”

Why would they, indeed. Here are some other highlights of the article:

*”Labor leaders who have spent months lobbying unsuccessfully for special protections under the Affordable Care Act warned this week that the White House’s continued refusal to help is dampening union support for Democratic candidates in this year’s midterm elections.

*”Leaders of two major unions, including the first to endorse Obama in 2008, said they have been betrayed by an administration that wooed their support for the 2009 legislation with promises to later address the peculiar needs of union-negotiated insurance plans that cover millions of workers.”

*”Their complaints reflect a broad sense of disappointment among many labor leaders, who say the Affordable Care Act has subjected union health plans to new taxes and mandates while not allowing them to share in the subsidies that have gone to private insurance companies competing on the newly created exchanges.”

*”After dozens of frustrating meetings with White House officials over the past year, including one with Obama, a number of angry labor officials say their members are far less likely to campaign and turn out for Democratic candidates in the midterm elections.”

*”Taylor and Terry O’Sullivan, president of the Laborers’ International Union of North America, laid out their grievances this week in a terse letter to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.), saying they are “bitterly disappointed” in the administration.”

*”A White House spokeswoman declined to comment on the union leaders’ claims that they were misled. A person familiar with Obama’s meeting with the labor chiefs said he “listened to the group’s concerns with empathy” but explained that the law would not permit the administration to take the steps they requested.”

*”But in the letter to Reid and Pelosi, O’Sullivan and Taylor wrote, “If the administration honestly thinks that these proposed rules are responsive to our concerns, they were not listening or they simply did not care.””

*”The rejections by the White House follow previous disappointments for the labor movement, which poured money into pro-Obama campaigns in 2008 and 2012 and deployed millions of grass-roots volunteers motivated largely by their support for Obama’s push to bring about near-universal health insurance. Another major goal of the labor movement — card-check legislation to make it easier for workers to form unions — failed to win support after what many labor officials thought was a lackluster effort by the White House.”

*”Union officials expect the health-care controversy to intensify a raging debate within the labor movement over how deeply labor should invest in Democratic Party candidates.”

*”Taylor said Unite Here officials have met with White House officials 48 times. At the time the health-care bill was being considered, he said, “we were told that ‘if there were problems, don’t worry, we’ll get them fixed.’ ”

“We thought that if we made the case to the agencies dealing with regulations to correct problems that hurt, really destroy, self-funded nonprofit health plans, it would be resolved,” Taylor said. “That clearly was naive or stupid.”

For the entire article, see:

The action the unions want cannot be accomplished “by a pen and a phone,” so they shouldn’t expect to get any relief that way. And now they say they feel “naïve or stupid.” At the very least they believe they were “misled” (translation: LIED TO) and “betrayed.” Sound familiar? It does to me – as my own family members “liked their health plan” but have found out they couldn’t keep it.

The developments reported in this article further illustrate that support for ObamaCare – and the political party that foisted it on the American people – continues to crumble as we approach the 2014 mid-term campaign season. This can only mean good news for the Republicans.

Latest Activity: Feb 02, 2014 at 12:45 PM

Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by sebekm
Send sebekm a Message
Report Abuse

Blog has been viewed (277) times.

Funkentelecky commented on Sunday, Feb 02, 2014 at 13:51 PM

Remember Nancy Pelosi’s statement in 2010 “We need to pass it to know what’s in it” That was addressed to all back in the day and was stupid to say for anyone and this came from the Speaker of the House #3 behind Obama and Biden.

Now let me answer the question for her, healthcare should have been run through the free market instead of government, take a look at Amazon and Apple. In the free market services may start off expensive but they get better and improve over a short period of time. Government services are proposed at reasonable prices but never make the mark and usually costs double to triple the proposed amount. Also if the Feds are running it who’s going to protect our rights when it hits the fan?

sebekm commented on Sunday, Feb 02, 2014 at 14:00 PM

Amen. That's the problem ANY TIME the government thinks they have all the answers and cuts the rest of the nation - and the free market - out of the process. A child of eight could have seen it coming in 2009 - as indicated by some of those "children" of the GOP who tried to sound the alarm back them. They were ignored and demonized - and look where we are today: EXACTLY WHERE THEY SAID WE WOULD BE.

Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by sebekm
Speaking Of Polls....
July 23, 2014
….according to an article posted a short while ago in the Washington Examiner: “Survey: Fewer than 1 in 5 better off because of Obamacare; many more worse off Eighteen percent of Americans, or fewer than one in five, say they or someone in their family is better off because of ...
Read More »
Lost Emails/Hard Drives Plague Obama Admin
July 20, 2014
Here’s further proof that the Obama administration STILL isn’t taking IRS-Gate seriously. As reported last week in an exclusive by Larry O'Connor of the Independent Journal Review: “Group At Center Of IRS Scandal Has Never Been Interviewed By FBI Investigators No one from True The Vote, the highest profile organization ...
Read More »
In Case You Missed It……
July 20, 2014
….here’s some news from the recent headlines: *Ah, the wonders of modern technology. Now they’ve come up with something they’re calling THE RAPE REPELLANT BRA. According to the headline at “This Rape Repellant Bra Will Shock You – LITERALLY” And “Engineering students in New Delhi have developed a bra ...
Read More »
Sweet Home Chicago
July 14, 2014
In recent news commentary on illegal immigrant amnesty, the current border crisis was being described as “President Obama’s Hurricane Katrina.” This conjecture is now being reinforced in the most unusual places. Not long ago in another blog, I cited a poll which identified President Obama as the “worst President since ...
Read More »
Black Americans: The True Casualties of Amnesty
July 10, 2014
That's the title of an article posted yesterday at by A.J. Delgado. In the article, Ms. Delgado makes a forceful case that the segment of American society MOST harmed by the Obama administration's actions (or lack thereof) on immigration is the African-American community. Here is the article in its ...
Read More »
[View More Blogs...]

Powered by
Morris Technology