[Report Abuse]
[Login to Blog] timeontarget's Blog
What did our wars win.
Last comment by timeontarget 2 years, 8 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

This column was written by Pat Buchanan

Timeontarget copied it from THE DRUDGE REPORT

“He ended one war and kept us out of any other,” is the tribute paid President Eisenhower.

Ike ended the Korean conflict in 1953, refused to intervene to save the French at Dien Bien Phu in 1954, and, rather than back the British-French-Israeli invasion, ordered them all out of Egypt in 1956.

Ending America longest wars may prove to be Barack Obama’s legacy.

For, while ending wars without victory may not garner from the historians’ the accolade of “great” or “near great,” it is sometimes the duty of a president who has inherited a war the nation no longer wishes to fight.

That was Nixon’s fate, as well as Ike’s, and Obama’s.

And as we look back at our interventions in the 21st century, where are the gains of all our fighting, bleeding and dying?
We know the costs — 8,000 dead, 40,000 wounded, $2 trillion in wealth sunk. But where are the benefits?

After Moammar Gadhafi fell in Libya, the mercenaries he had hired returned to Mali. The French had to intervene. In Benghazi, the city we started the war to save, a U.S. ambassador and three Americans would be murdered by terrorists.

Libya today appears to be breaking apart.

While Gadhafi was dreadful, what threat was he to us, especially after he had surrendered his weapons of mass destruction?
In Egypt, we helped overthrow President Hosni Mubarak and hailed the election of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Mohammad Morsi.
A year later, we green-lighted Morsi’s overthrow by Mubarak’s army.

Terrorism has returned to Egypt, the Sinai is now a no man’s land, and almost all Egypt hates us now.

The Shia regime we brought to power in Iraq has so repressed the Sunnis that Anbar province is now hosting al-Qaida. Fallujah and Ramadi have fallen. President Nuri al-Maliki is asking for U.S. weapons to retrieve Anbar and for U.S. personnel to train his soldiers.
Unlike the bad, old Iraq, the new Iraq tilts to Tehran.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai has refused to sign a status of forces agreement giving our troops legal protections if they remain. This could cause a complete U.S. pullout in 2014, leading to the return of the Taliban we drove out in 2001.

Sunday saw terrorism in the heart of Kabul, with a restaurant favored by foreign officials targeted by a car bomb, followed by a machine-gunning of dining patrons in which 21 were killed.

Americans have fought bravely there for a dozen years. But how has our nation building in the Hindu Kush benefited the good old USA?

Pakistan, with nuclear weapons, has become a haven of the Taliban, perhaps the most dangerous country on earth. Anti-American elements in the Khyber region have, because of our drone attacks, been blocking a U.S. troop exodus to the sea.

How enduring is what we accomplished in Afghanistan?

Last summer, Obama, goaded by democracy crusaders and the War Party, was about to launch strikes on Syria when America arose as one to call a halt.

We did not attack Syria. Had we, we would have struck a blow for an insurgency dominated by the al-Nusra Front and Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. The ISIS goal? Detach Anbar from Iraq and unite it with jihadist-occupied sectors of Syria in a new caliphate.

Can we not see that Bashar Assad’s worst enemies are ours as well?

Syria’s civil war, which has cost 100,000 dead, with millions uprooted and a million in exile, has spilled over into Lebanon, where Hezbollah backs Assad and the Sunnis back the rebels.

The neoconservatives say much of this might have been averted, had we left a stronger contingent of U.S. troops in Iraq and supported the Syrian uprising before the jihadists took control.

They were for attacking Assad last summer, are for more severe sanctions on Iran now, and are for war if Iran does not give up all enrichment of uranium.

But the neocons have broken their pick with the people. For they have been wrong about just about everything.

They were wrong about Saddam’s WMD and a “cakewalk” war.

They were wrong about how welcome we would be in Iraq and how Baghdad would become a flourishing democracy and model for the Mideast.

They did not see the Sunni-Shia war our intervention would ignite.

They were wrong about how our interests would be served in attacking Libya.

They did not see the disaster that would unfold in Pakistan.

While we did not follow their advice and attack Syria, how have we suffered from having taken a pass on Syria’s civil-sectarian war?
From Libya to Lebanon, Syria to Yemen, Iraq to Afghanistan, the Maghreb and Middle East are aflame. What have we lost by getting out of the wars Obama found us in? How would we benefit from parachuting back into the middle of the fire?

Which raises a related question: Was Obama wrong in extricating us from the wars into which George W. Bush plunged his country?

How will history answer that one?

A Pat Buchanan column found on the Drudge Report

Latest Activity: Jan 23, 2014 at 6:08 AM

Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by timeontarget
Send timeontarget a Message
Report Abuse

Blog has been viewed (584) times.

timeontarget commented on Thursday, Jan 23, 2014 at 06:26 AM

I imagine this will displease some of our military and to them I must say I'm sorry but I disagree.

Our invasions of those Nations was not to protect my freedom nor any of my loved ones.

Our WAR MONGERING elected President's and Congress have bankrupted America financially and morally.

Our MERCENARY MILITARY is the greatest threat to the security of our citizens in coming years.

timeontarget commented on Thursday, Jan 23, 2014 at 16:55 PM

While I am well aware that this,

particular perspective of mine,

aka TOT is not what is expected from the older citizens of this great country,

please all who read this,

Know that I am not alone in my opinion.

timeontarget commented on Monday, Jan 27, 2014 at 06:44 AM

Yes we have always compensated those who were in service to the various military branches.

However when we had the military draft compensation was not nearly as generous as it has become since the draft.

Before the draft was done away with service was a hardship financially for some but it was proudly endured by almost any and all folks from all walks of life.

Some draftees served their hitch and as soon as possible went back to civilian life returning to their more prosperous employment opportunities in the private sector.

Some draftees made excellent soldiers and attained rank rapidly. Many of those felt that they could better provide for themselves by staying in and did so.

Many of those retired as yet young men and collected many decades of compensation from our treasury.

This has gradually become a tremendous burden on the taxpayers.

timeontarget commented on Monday, Jan 27, 2014 at 16:22 PM

sebekm, I wholeheartedly agree with every single word of your post just above.

timeontarget commented on Tuesday, Jan 28, 2014 at 07:26 AM

My gripe is with my elected officials and their misuse of mercenary troops to invade sorverign nations and wreak havoc on citizens of other countries.

Our draft era military would have no part of what our military has done in these most recent invasions on foreign lands.

Remember those who went to Canada.

Ike warned us about this in his farewell address.

Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by timeontarget
Trump's Gettysburg speech
October 23, 2016
28 Things Donald Trump Promises to Do as President Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump delivers a speech during a campaign event, Saturday, Oct. 22, 2016, in Gettysburg, Pa. Donald Trump is laying out delivered a long list of things he would do if elected president. During an appearance in Gettysburg, ...
Read More »
Hillary's 13 Acts of treason
October 22, 2016
Whistleblower website WikiLeaks has shaken the DNC to its core, by releasing thousands of emails that expose the depths of corruption of this once respected party. The sheer amount of fraud, dishonesty, and criminal activity on the part of Hillary, the media, and the Democratic Party is enough to get ...
Read More »
What goes around comes around
October 21, 2016
An Establishment in Panic By Patrick J. Buchanan Friday - October 21, 2016 The establishment is horrified because, deep within its soul, it fears the people. It may rule the country, and may rig the system.... But that establishment senses, rightly, that it is unloved and even detested. Pressed by ...
Read More »
Coulter/ Media has scammed us.
October 20, 2016
Coulter on our corrupt news media. ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// HILLARY'S ADVANTAGE: THE MEDIA; TRUMP'S ADVANTAGE: THE ISSUES October 19, 2016 Say, does anyone remember when Trump was the lightweight with no "policy specifics"? I have an entire chapter in my book, In Trump We Trust: E Pluribus Awesome!, quoting media savants complaining ...
Read More »
Cal Thomas/advice for Trump
October 18, 2016
Cal Thomas: The one thing Trump should do at the final debate Cal Thomas By Cal Thomas Published October 18, 2016 FoxNews.com Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump points at Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton as he speaks during the second presidential debate at Washington University in St. Louis, Sunday, Oct. ...
Read More »
[View More Blogs...]

Powered by
Morris Technology