ObamaCare "Insults" Hispanics
"I Don't Mind A Parasite. I Object To A Cut-Rate One."

Take Me To Post Comment Form


That's the title of a column posted the other day at USATODAY.com by Daniel Garza, executive director of The LIBRE Initiative. According to his bio at thelibreinitiative.com:

"Daniel Garza has more than two decades of both public and private sector experience managing media and public relations, directing corporate projects, and working at all levels of government. Born in the Central Valley of California, Garza and his family would migrate annually from their ancestral hometown of Garza Gonzalez in Nuevo Leon in Mexico, throughout California, Nebraska and Washington State following the crop season as farm workers.

His knowledge of the plight of the immigrant community has earned him a reputation for advocating on behalf of the Hispanics and Latinos for sound public policy recognizing that the current status of our economy requires that this vital community play an essential role in bringing about solutions."

Here's what Garza has to say about Hispanics and ObamaCare:

"Hispanic Americans have a rocky relationship with the Affordable Care Act. After years of planning, the Spanish-language version of HealthCare.gov opened two months late and was only officially launched in January. But that was the least of the website's problems.

The finished product turned out to be more punchline than health care portal. The glitchy "Spanglish" site is not only a technical disaster; it's also an embarrassment to the Spanish-language and a sign of disrespect to the Hispanic-American community, for whom much is at stake in the health care debate. According to the Census Bureau, just under 30%of the Hispanic community lacks health insurance. This is 50% higher than the African-American rate of 19% and nearly triple the white rate of 11%.

Despite these numbers, the Affordable Care Act isn't exactly incentivizing us to sign up. Beyond the broken and insulting website, the law encourages Hispanics to forgo health insurance in the same way that it alienates the youth: It's prohibitively expensive.

Hispanic Americans are much younger than the general population. Our median age is only 27, a full 10 years younger than the national average. We are thus disproportionately harmed by the skyrocketing premiums that the law afflicts on the young.

This is particularly true for states with high Hispanic populations. Nationally, the average 27-year-old man is facing a 41% premium hike, according to Forbes. In New Mexico — the state with the highest percentage of Hispanics — Forbes estimates the average 27-year old's premiums jumped by 160% for men and 146% for women. California's is better only by comparison (they're looking at an average increase of 42%), while Florida's premiums spiked by 64% for men and 30% for women. Even after subsidies, these numbers can still be too steep for many Hispanics to pay.

A less well-documented problem is how the Affordable Care Act makes it harder for Hispanic Americans to find doctors. Although we account for 17% of the country's population, only 5% of physicians are Hispanic. This has led to chronic doctor shortages in our communities. Overall, our culture is classified as underserved by the Department of Health and Human Services, meaning that our communities typically have more than 2,000 patients per doctor.

The Affordable Care Act has only exacerbated these problems by restricting the number of doctors covered under Obamacare health plans. Thousands of Hispanic Americans have also lost their insurance in recent months; still others have lost their doctors.

My organization talked to Grazie Christie, a Hispanic-American doctor in South Florida, about how the law has affected her practice. She had no shortage of concerns, arguing above all that the Affordable Care Act does not "place patients first." As someone who entered the medical profession precisely because she wanted to help, it now pains her to tell her patients, "I don't have an answer" for whether she'll still be able to treat them in the future.

Given the realities they're facing with the Affordable Care Act, it's no surprise that Hispanics have largely shunned the law. While the latest Obamacare numbers don't include a breakdown by race, before the Obama administration's "Spanglish" website launched, officials indicated that fewer than 6,000 Hispanics signed up for insurance in the program's first two months in California — the model state for sign-ups with a well-run website. In New Mexico, where 47% of the state's 2.1 million residents are Hispanic or Latino, the number of sign-ups for those months was fewer than 1,000.

If the bureaucrats who wrote CuidadoDeSalud.gov are reading this, those numbers translate roughly into "no gracias.""

See: http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/01/14/hispanics-obamacare-website-column/4472389/

Garza points out at the outset of his post that: "Embarrassing Spanish-language version of website is the least of its (ObamaCare's) problems." This has been the case all along for the "glitch"/security-riddled launch of the English version of Healthcare.gov as well. In the news just today, even DEMOCRATS are referring to the website as "disastrous" in an effort to distance themselves from this fiasco:

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/368627/dem-super-pac-slams-obamacare-ad-andrew-johnson

And even the "hacker" community believes that Healthcare.gov stinks. In fact, just within the last hour it was reported that in testimony before Congress, a prominent member of the information security community said this:

"“Nothing’s really changed since our November 19 testimony....In fact, it’s worse.”

See: http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/hackers-healthcare-gov-still-riddled-potential-security-issues-2D11940198

Obviously - "it's worse" means that while the government has been supposedly trying to fix the problems, they have in fact taken the security status of the website BACKWARDS, and made the problems worse than they were before. Is this really surprising? And the website woes are the least of the problems that this ill-conceived, priority-misplaced, ram-it-down-our-throats legislation has caused and will continue to cause until it is "fixed" - one way or another.

Let's all hope that the fixes come soon.


Latest Activity: Jan 16, 2014 at 1:52 PM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by sebekm
Send sebekm a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (469) times.


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by sebekm
 
Political Potpourri
August 13, 2014
As they say on Bret Baier’s “Special Report” program, “here are a few pickings from the political grapevine”: *It appears that the media is finally beginning to turn and get tough on President Obama. Last week the Washington Post – liberal bastion and investigator of all things Republican – chose ...
Read More »
 
ObamaCare Update
August 13, 2014
In case you missed them – here are a few headlines regarding ObamaCare from earlier this month: *”Barney Frank: They “Just Lied to People” About ObamaCare That’s right – Barney Frank, Democrat and former long-term congressman FINALLY made this admission in a recent interview with the Huffington Post: “The rollout ...
Read More »
 
Want To Have The (Absolute) Last Word……
August 06, 2014
…and have some fun with it? Write your own obituary and make it humorous and self-deprecating. That’s what Kevin McGroarty did. He wrote it when he knew the end was near, and all the newspaper had to do was fill in the date. Here it is: “Obituary Kevin J. McGroarty ...
Read More »
 
One Reason Our “Do Nothing Congress” Does Nothing
August 06, 2014
Much has been said about GOP “obstructionism” – particularly as it relates to President Obama’s liberal agenda. It’s clear that as far as Republicans are concerned, President Obama NEEDS to be obstructed. But little has been said or written about Democrat “obstructionism.” Yes – that definitely exists as well, and ...
Read More »
 
Obama’s “Legislative” Strategy
July 30, 2014
According to our Constitution, the Congress is supposed to MAKE the laws; the President is supposed to “faithfully EXECUTE” the laws, and the Judiciary is supposed to INTERPRET the laws (in a constitutional and legislative context). But now comes our President who believes his oath of office is not to ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology