the circus continues.
Last comment by sebekm 8 months, 3 weeks ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

from john fund.

Yesterday the Obama administration suddenly moved to allow hundreds of thousands of people who’ve lost their insurance due to Obamacare to sign up for bare-bone “catastrophic” plans. It’s at least the 14th unilateral change to Obamacare that’s been made without consulting Congress.

“It shows that the Obamacare insurance products aren’t selling so, at the last minute, the administration is holding a fire sale on a failed launch,” says Grace-Marie Turner of the Galen Institute, a health-care advocacy group. “Just think how you must feel if you were one of the people who spent the last two months fighting their way through HealthCare.gov to buy a policy that will be thousands of dollars more expensive than this catastrophic insurance!”

Of course, like every other exemption from Obamacare the latest fix is supposed to last only a year, raising the prospect that people will be kicked off their catastrophic coverage as soon as the 2014 election is safely in the political rear-view mirror.

The fact that no one really knows just how Obamacare is doing (the administration is hiding the numbers) or where it’s going (it’s like an impressionistic painting in progress) may explain the public consensus that’s developed behind delaying its implementation. This week’s Fox News poll found Obamacare to still be a polarizing issue with 53 percent of respondents wanting it repealed and 41 percent wanting to keep it. But then this question was asked: “Setting aside how you feel about the law, do you think implementation of it should be delayed for a year until more details are ironed out, or not?”

It wasn’t even close. By 67 percent to 28 percent people now want the law delayed. And every demographic group agrees: 57 percent of liberals, 65 percent of women, 67 percent of those under age 35, and 60 percent of lower-income voters. Even African Americans, the bedrock of Obama’s support base now favor a delay by 48 percent to 47 percent.

The public may not know the details of health-care policy, or how to navigate Obamacare’s website. But they can see the fiasco of Obamacare unfolding before them and they’re increasingly united on slowing it down. Look for more and more Democrats in Congress, who will have to face the voters next November, to join them.


Latest Activity: Dec 21, 2013 at 9:56 AM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by gacpl
Send gacpl a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (351) times.

sebekm commented on Saturday, Dec 21, 2013 at 13:09 PM

"It’s at least the 14th unilateral change to Obamacare that’s been made without consulting Congress."

This point is one that SHOULD NOT be lost. When the Obama administration does this, it is basically "making things up as they go along" and there is a strong argument that they are violating the law when they do it. The Executive Branch just can't take a law that was passed by Congress and "change" or "modify" it willy-nilly without resubmission to Congress. THAT'S THE WAY OUR SYSTEM WORKS. As pointed out in this article regarding one "fix" the President "implemented":

"...(T)he fix exceeds the president’s discretion in implementing the law and amounts to legislation from the White House. The president has no constitutional authority to rewrite or unbundle statutes, especially in ways that impose new obligations on people, as the fix does."

See: http://www.politico.com/magazine/stor...

As to your John Fund post above, I like the title:

"Who Says Obama Hasn’t United the Country?"

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/...

sebekm commented on Saturday, Dec 21, 2013 at 14:03 PM

...and this article advances the argument that President Obama HIMSELF is dismantling ObamaCare. In part it says:

"It seems Nancy Pelosi was wrong when she said "we have to pass" ObamaCare to "find out what's in it." No one may ever know because the White House keeps treating the Affordable Care Act's text as a mere suggestion subject to day-to-day revision. Its latest political retrofit is the most brazen: President Obama is partly suspending the individual mandate.

The White House argued at the Supreme Court that the insurance-purchase mandate was not only constitutional but essential to the law's success, while refusing Republican demands to delay or repeal it. But late on Thursday, with only four days to go before the December enrollment deadline, the Health and Human Services Department decreed that millions of Americans are suddenly exempt.

Individuals whose health plans were canceled will now automatically qualify for a "hardship exemption" from the mandate. If they can't or don't sign up for a new plan, they don't have to pay the tax. They can also get a special category of ObamaCare insurance designed for people under age 30.

***

So merry Christmas. If ObamaCare's benefit and income redistribution requirements made your old, cheaper, better health plan illegal, you now have the option of going without coverage without the government taking your money as punishment. You can also claim the tautological consolation of an ObamaCare hardship exemption due to ObamaCare itself."

See: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/S...

(This article also proves the adage that "you can learn something new every day." I had to look up "tautological.")

sebekm commented on Saturday, Dec 21, 2013 at 14:14 PM

...and this article outlines another "unintended consequence" where if you are one of the 150 MILLION Americans who get insurance through your job, "prepare to pay MORE."

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/p...

This is a BIG unintended consequence which the administration couldn't have NOT known about, and which they chose to ignore in favor of ramming their signature legislation - which you had "to pass in order to know what was in it" - down our throats.

This situation did not have to be. They could have advanced legislation which mandated the insurance companies cover the uninsured, the elderly, those with pre-existing conditions, etc., - and have provided the government subsidies to make health care REALLY "affordable" for these people - WITHOUG futzing up the entire existing system. But along with their stated goals, the expansion of the welfare/nanny state was an INTENDED consequence of ObamaCare.

WE THE PEOPLE should not let them get away with it.

sebekm commented on Saturday, Dec 21, 2013 at 14:16 PM

...WITHOUT futzing up, that is....

Graeme245 commented on Sunday, Dec 22, 2013 at 07:31 AM

I've been meaning to share John Turley's testimony before the House Judiciary Committee (12/03/13) with you 'sebekm' I thought you would find it not only entertaining but also thought provoking;

http://tinyurl.com/l77x287

Then you consider the position that some people have put themselves in by signing up for 'medicaid' under Obamacare... Things that make you go hhmmmmm!!!

http://preview.tinyurl.com/krk9mku

sebekm commented on Thursday, Dec 26, 2013 at 15:38 PM

Entertaining? Ugh - Turley has really gotten into the weeds on this one. He could have just said: "The Imperial Presidency Continues To Expand Under Obama" and have been done with it. But then again, I've never known a lawyer who would limit themselves to eight words when they could "'splain it better" with 800,000.

One of the supposedly "unintended consequences" of ObamaCare is the explosion of Medicaid signups across the country. But I'm not so sure the Administration didn't see that one coming as well. It's just another way to spread (and avoid) the costs of ObamaCare - since Medicaid bills are paid from federal, state and local tax funds, and the program is run by state and local governments. But TAX funds are still paying for the program. This really amounts to more wealth redistribution via taxation, which Chief Justice John Roberts essentially said in his Supreme Court opinion which validated ObamaCare.


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by gacpl
 
guess what you will pay for now
August 25, 2014
Gender Reassignment! this is ridiculous. but it's more of what we can expect from obama care. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/08/25/obamacare-now-pays-for-gender-reassignment.html
Read More »
 
I'm re-posting this with a footnote
August 25, 2014
How Taxes Work by T. Davies This is a VERY simple way to understand the tax laws. Read on - it does make you think!! Let's put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand. Suppose that every day, ten men go out for dinner. The bill for all ten comes ...
Read More »
 
don't blame the police.
August 12, 2014
Police officers aren’t the ones destroying the black community I keep hearing that “violence erupted” in Ferguson, Missouri after a police officer shot an unarmed black man. This headline is a bit misleading, seeing as how Ferguson is one of the most dangerous, crime-ridden towns in America, so violence is ...
Read More »
 
Fun facts
July 23, 2014
Here are some more fun facts on the worst economic president ever: $17.3 Trillion: The Current National Debt After Five Years Of State Of The Union Promises To Tackle The Problem. (U.S. Treasury Department, Accessed 1/24/14) $6.6 Trillion: Added To The National Debt Despite Obama’s Declaration In His 2009 Address ...
Read More »
 
back door 2nd amendment attack
July 05, 2014
Herculaneum Smelter Update The Doe Run Company (Doe Run) has issued the following response related to the company’s Herculaneum, Mo., smelter: On Dec. 31, 2013, The Doe Run Company’s primary lead smelter in Herculaneum, Mo., which has operated since 1892, will cease operations. As a result of the smelter’s closure, ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology