HRC has as more experience than W. did when he ran for POTUS. Besides, women are smarter than men. WE Need a Woman to run the country. I have already sent her a check!
experience like this? people have very short memories.
Excerpted from EO-History: The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.
Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.
“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”
It seemed to me like NOBODY answered that call.
One of the biggest knocks on Hillary is that when you closely examine her RECORD - there is no record. But she certainly provides - for the Democrats - a lot of HOPE for CHANGE. But after eight years of Obama's "hope and change" that wasn't, I wonder if the rest of the voting population will be buying that theme in 2016. I seriously doubt it, but you never know.
The reason I posted this article was that I thought it curious that we'd have a senior Democrat Senator - after only the first year of an incumbent Democrat President's second term - saying that we need SOMEBODY ELSE AS PRESIDENT - *NOW MORE THAN EVER*! I found that an incredible statement to make. Second term presidents historically become "lame ducks" in their last two years - not after only one year when they just won in an electoral vote landslide.
There's more here than just another Democrat trying to change the subject from ObamaCare or to pump up HRC's 2016 chances. Exactly what I'm not sure, but Feinstein certainly made a statement (NOT favorable to President Obama) with the timing and phraseology of this one.