[Report Abuse]
[Login to Blog] Funkentelecky's Blog
If You Like Your Facts...You Can Keep Them
Last comment by sebekm 4 months, 2 weeks ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

Obamacare: If You Like Your Facts...You Can Keep Them

President Barack Obama recently asserted, “Thanks in part to the Affordable Care Act, also known as ‘Obamacare,’ the cost of health care is now growing at the slowest rate in 50 years.” So, you may be losing your health care coverage, and you may end up paying more -- but, hey, rising costs are slowing overall “in part” because of Obamacare.
True, as Obama says, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services -- the agency that administers Medicaid and Medicare -- “estimated that …[in] the three years since Obamacare passed, we’ve seen the slowest growth in health care costs on record.”
But is this due “in part” to Obamacare?
About Obama’s claim, the Washington Post said: “The President, in his comment, used the word ‘helped,’ which is sufficiently vague that in theory it could mean any impact, no matter how slight. Yet he also cited this as a reason for not walking away from the law, which suggests he thinks it had more than a modest impact. In fact, some listeners might interpret his statement as suggesting the law has had a significant impact. However, ‘help’ could also simply mean ‘contributed.’” In other words, this is similar to the President’s pre-“stimulus” push. He claimed it would “save or create” 3.5 million jobs -- a claim sufficiently slippery and vague so as to escape measurement.
Here, the President wants us to believe that: millions now have subsidized health care insurance; carriers cannot decline based on pre-existing illness; carriers cannot “discriminate” when setting rates; carriers must allow “children” under 26 to remain on their parents’ policies -- all of which has been accomplished while “slowing down the rise in costs”?
The Obama-sympathetic ABC News “fact-checked” it. Yes, increases are more modest, as the President claims, “but many independent experts believe the slowdown is largely due to the economy and a contraction of spending during the recession. The role of the Affordable Care Act has been limited and hard to measure, they say. … Experts note that changes under ACA could ultimately increase the growth rate of health care costs initially, since more people will be covered (and paying for) health plans and treatments. The continued economic recovery is expected to contribute, as well, as more Americans have increased income to spend on health care.”
The “fact checker” from the Obama-friendly Washington Post said: ”The evidence has become too murky to reach a firm conclusion. Clearly, even economists are unsure why health care inflation has continued to remain low so long.”
The Wall Street Journal’s opinion page was not murky: “These assertions border on nonsense. National spending on health care is projected to reach a record $2.9 trillion in 2013, according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. This is more than 25 percent above pre-recession spending levels in 2007. Health-care expenditures per capita and as a percentage of GDP are also at record highs, expected to top out this year at $9,216 and 18 percent respectively. …
“Annual health spending growth rates began to decline a decade ago. In 2002, health care spending grew by nearly 10 percent in a single year. The growth rate dropped to 7.1 percent in 2004, 6.2 percent in 2007, and bottomed out at 3.9 percent in 2009 -- the worst year of the Great Recession, where it has stayed ever since. Obamacare was enacted in 2010.”
Another Obamacare editorial page opponent, Investors Business Daily, said: “Yes, the rate of growth in national health spending has slowed in recent years. … But these have nothing to do with Obamacare. The latest report from the chief actuary of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services -- the official scorekeeper of health spending -- says the spending growth slowdown is ‘unrelated to the (Affordable Care Act).’
“It also reports that Obamacare will add to national spending over the next decade. Other reports have pinned much of the slowdown on the recession and Obama's lousy recovery that followed it. Plus, Obamacare is now pushing premiums up.
“As Charles Blahous, a former trustee for Social Security and Medicare, puts it, Obama's latest cost-cutting claims ‘are just as groundless as the ones that misled so many Americans to believe they would be able to keep their previous coverage.’”
It is still the economy, stupid. And this is a pathetic recovery. After the tax hikes, the largest ever “stimulus,” imposition of massive new financial and environmental regulations -- and now Obamacare -- Obamanomics produced the worst recovery in 80 years, still 2 million jobs short of our peak, while millions more have completely given up looking for work.
Obamacare is less popular than ever. More ominously for Democrats, a recent Gallup poll finds that Obamacare’s unpopularity has caused many Americans to re-think whether “health care coverage” is “the responsibility of the federal government.” In 2006, just seven years ago, 69 percent said it was the responsibility of the federal government. Now, that number has shrunk to 42 percent, with 56 percent saying health care coverage is not a responsibility of the federal government.
How knows? Maybe millions are finally waking up.


Latest Activity: Dec 07, 2013 at 6:34 PM

Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by Funkentelecky
Send Funkentelecky a Message
Report Abuse

Blog has been viewed (218) times.

sebekm commented on Sunday, Dec 08, 2013 at 13:23 PM

Your right, Funky. The spin-meisters are working overtime to put lipstick on this pig. The latest deception to be fully exposed came just this morning. Check out this exchange between Chris Wallace of Fox News Sunday and the "architect" of ObamaCare -Zeke Emanuel:

Wallace: "President Obama famously promised, if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. Doesn't that turn out to be just as false, just as misleading, as his promise about if you like your plan, you can keep your plan? Isn't it a fact, sir, that a number, most, in fact, of the Obamacare health plans that are being offered on the exchanges exclude a number of doctors and hospitals to lower costs?"

Emanuel: "The president never said you were going to have unlimited choice of any doctor in the country you want to go to."

Wallace: "No. He asked a question. If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. Did he not say that, sir?"

Emanuel: "He didn't say you could have unlimited choice."

Wallace: "It's a simple yes or no question. Did he say if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor?"

Emanuel: "Yes. But look, if you want to pay more for an insurance company that covers your doctor, you can do that. This is a matter of choice. We know in all sorts of places you pay more for certain -- for a wider range of choices or wider range of benefits.The issue isn't the selective networks. People keep saying, Oh, the problem is you're going to have a selective network--"

Wallace: "Well, if you lose your doctor or lose your hospital--"

Emanuel: "Let me just say something. People are going to have a choice as to whether they want to pay a certain amount for a selective network or pay more for a broader network."

Wallace: "Which will mean your premiums will probably go up."

Emanuel: "They get that choice. That's a choice they always made."

See: http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/o...

As I said before - Sierra Oscar Alpha Bravo. Nobody who was selling this program EVER said:

"If you like your doctor, you MAY be able to keep your doctor PROVIDING you are willing to pay more - in some cases a LOT more - if the doctor isn't in the ObamaCare network."

Now THAT would have been the truth. But it wouldn't have gotten Obama reelected. THAT'S the motivation these people had and now it's all about revising history. These people won't even admit their lies when they are staring them - and the entire country - right in the face. Can't they see that everybody can see they're just trying to weasel-word their way out of the trick box they put themselves into? Geezus!

This reminds me of the times when I as a parent KNEW the truth, and had to work like a federal prosecutor to pull it out of one of my kids. I hope the voters pound every Democrat who supported these lies in the upcoming elections. They must not be rewarded for their prevarications.

Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by Funkentelecky
Top Ten Reasons to Vote Democrat in 2014
April 21, 2014
I can only take credit for #10, but thought you’d get a kick out of this. Read more at http://allenbwest.com/2014/04/top-10-reasons-vote-democrat-2014%e2%80%a8%e2%80%a8/#VFAovxBk82PpmK63.99 10. I’ll vote Democrat because I can’t wait for college football season to be delayed or cancelled because the student athletes are union employees. 9. I’ll vote Democrat because I ...
Read More »
The 77 Percent Lie -- and Why Obama Keeps Telling
April 13, 2014
The 77 Percent Lie -- and Why Obama Keeps Telling It A quick way to kill debate is to accuse your political adversary of “lying.” Still, it’s hard to figure out what else propels President Barack Obama to falsely assert, yet again, that employers rip off female employees by paying ...
Read More »
Ben Carson for President!
April 03, 2014
Concerned Patriot, As someone interested in the outcome of the 2016 presidential election, you will certainly want to know all you can about Dr. Ben Carson and where he stands on the critical issues facing our nation. That’s what you will find out when you read his bestselling book, America ...
Read More »
Obamacare: Abuse of Power Endangers Nations Health
March 27, 2014
When liberal pro-Obama scholars question the legality of President Barack Obama’s actions to implement Obamacare, the issue of illegal presidential use of power moves from partisan to frightening. George Washington Law School's Jonathan Turley is the second most quoted law professor in the nation and a two-time Obama voter. He ...
Read More »
Malcolm X Called Them "Chumps"
March 26, 2014
When blacks gave 80 percent of their vote to the Democratic Party in 1964, black activist Malcolm X called them "political chumps." White voters, X said, “are so evenly divided that every time they vote, the race is so close they have to go back and count the votes all ...
Read More »
[View More Blogs...]

Powered by
Morris Technology