Seven Score And Ten Years Ago...
"I Don't Mind A Parasite. I Object To A Cut-Rate One."
Last comment by JimmyMack 11 months, 1 week ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form


Most of the recent headlines surrounding the 150th anniversary of Lincoln's Gettysburg Address have centered on President Obama's decision to decline an invitation to personally attend memorial ceremonies being conducted at the battle site next week. But today, another "historic" event occurred in connection with Honest Abe's unforgettable speech:

A Harrisburg, Pennsylvania publication whose forebearers had condemned Lincoln's speech in 1863 as "silly remarks" have finally retracted their opinion. (Harrisburg is located approximately 38 miles from Gettysburg.)

Yes - wonders never cease. What IS a wonder is why it took them 150 years to do so. I guess it's "better late than never." For the retraction, see:

http://www.pennlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2013/11/a_patriot-news_editorial_retraction_the_gettysburg_address.html#incart_flyout_opinion


Latest Activity: Nov 14, 2013 at 1:51 PM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by sebekm
Send sebekm a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (269) times.

JimmyMack commented on Thursday, Nov 14, 2013 at 17:09 PM

Save for Slavery, which was an inhuman abomination that the South should have rid it self of on its own, I recommend reading William Bradford Huie's Book: HAD THE SOUTH WON THE CIVIL WAR. It's a quick read, written probably 50 years ago. Maybe more.

The South's pinnacle was briefly attained by Pickets charge of Cemetery Ridge where the stars and bars briefly waved thru the intense hand to hand combat. Bobby Lee's boys never recovered from that failed charge at Gettysburg that ultimately led to the surrender of the Army of Northern Virginia to U.S. Grant at Appomatox.

A lost cause captured fully by that haunting tune you have posted here before Sebe.

However, the South did rise again with the coming of Martin Luther King out of the South to bring about equal rights for all. Something that in truth, was not brought about earlier even after the Civil War and Reconstruction. The Yankees handled Reconstruction of the South from 1865-1877
so poorly, that an argument can be made that their occupation of the South led to the formation of another evil entity, the KKK. But that's for another blog.

Good Post, Sebe.

sebekm commented on Thursday, Nov 14, 2013 at 18:15 PM

Thanks, Jimmy. And you know that I contend that the South rose AGAIN - when the blue states became red. But that's another story for another day.

I hope President Obama changes his mind and personally attends the Gettysburg ceremonies. It seems to me that "it is altogether fitting and proper" that he goes there himself. I can't imagine why he wouldn't want to go. I haven't seen any reason why - i.e., that he's out of the country or has a scheduling conflict or whatever. He's "sending" the Secretary of the Interior, according to this link:

http://www.abc27.com/story/23833906/o...

Perhaps they know something. Kennedy was advised not to go to Dallas; he ignored the warning; and look at what happened. I'm not criticizing Obama but his decision is puzzling.

JimmyMack commented on Friday, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:36 PM

@Sebe."when the blue states became red." Sebe are you absolutely sure that you are an Independent? I know you have written that you consider your self center-right, but all this anti-Dem thing, along with the blue to red, doesn't exactly ring a Bell of Independence to my ear.

sebekm commented on Saturday, Nov 16, 2013 at 13:45 PM

Jimmy: Glad you asked. My independence is based on the fact that I am not registered with any political party, and I try to view all the issues clearly. It doesn't mean that I ignore my life's experiences or a political parties' policies/philosophy that do more harm than good. I consider myself an independent thinker who chooses not to ascribe to any political parties' platform per se, but who believes that TODAY'S Democratic party goals - by and large - are focused on tax and spend; improper wealth redistribution (assuming you can have ANY "proper" wealth redistribution), and a "reconfiguration" of American society which is ultimately self-destructive. There's a fine line, but I contend that "anti-Democrat" does not automatically equal "Republican" just because I support some of their goals.

Since WWII, my views on U.S. presidents have straddled party lines. I think that Reagan was a tremendous President, but nobody is "perfect." Bush the Elder was probably "most qualified" when he assumed the presidency by virtue of prior jobs and experience, but he wasn't a great politician. Dubya did a good job of kick-starting the "war" on those who perpetrated 9/11, but in the long run he acted too much like a Democrat fiscally, which set up our current financial woes.

Ike was the right President for the 50s, and he did identify the threat of the "military industrial complex." I greatly admire FDR, and this country could do a lot worse (see 2009 - present) than having a president like Harry S. Truman. My views on Carter and Clinton are well-documented on this here web site. I rank Carter down there with Andrew Johnson and Richard Nixon. Clinton was too schmoozy but he knew when to "pivot to the center" and work with Republicans on behalf of the American people.

Kennedy's presidency was cut short, and growing up a Catholic in parochial schools doesn't allow me to have an unbiased opinion of him. Clinton's economic policy from 1995 was exactly what we needed, and I'm glad we had somebody like Dubya in there when 9/11 hit rather than Clinton or Carter.

The Bottom Line: For me, it's just a case of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend." You can see this in action quite a bit in the Middle East - and in a lot of world politics actually.

JimmyMack commented on Monday, Nov 18, 2013 at 16:51 PM

Thanks Sebe.


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by sebekm
 
Political Potpourri
August 13, 2014
As they say on Bret Baier’s “Special Report” program, “here are a few pickings from the political grapevine”: *It appears that the media is finally beginning to turn and get tough on President Obama. Last week the Washington Post – liberal bastion and investigator of all things Republican – chose ...
Read More »
 
ObamaCare Update
August 13, 2014
In case you missed them – here are a few headlines regarding ObamaCare from earlier this month: *”Barney Frank: They “Just Lied to People” About ObamaCare That’s right – Barney Frank, Democrat and former long-term congressman FINALLY made this admission in a recent interview with the Huffington Post: “The rollout ...
Read More »
 
Want To Have The (Absolute) Last Word……
August 06, 2014
…and have some fun with it? Write your own obituary and make it humorous and self-deprecating. That’s what Kevin McGroarty did. He wrote it when he knew the end was near, and all the newspaper had to do was fill in the date. Here it is: “Obituary Kevin J. McGroarty ...
Read More »
 
One Reason Our “Do Nothing Congress” Does Nothing
August 06, 2014
Much has been said about GOP “obstructionism” – particularly as it relates to President Obama’s liberal agenda. It’s clear that as far as Republicans are concerned, President Obama NEEDS to be obstructed. But little has been said or written about Democrat “obstructionism.” Yes – that definitely exists as well, and ...
Read More »
 
Obama’s “Legislative” Strategy
July 30, 2014
According to our Constitution, the Congress is supposed to MAKE the laws; the President is supposed to “faithfully EXECUTE” the laws, and the Judiciary is supposed to INTERPRET the laws (in a constitutional and legislative context). But now comes our President who believes his oath of office is not to ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology