[Report Abuse]
[Login to Blog] Funkentelecky's Blog
Bush(Iraq War)Vs.Obama(Obamacare)--Who"Lied"?
SFC (RET) U.S. Army Combat Veteran, Patriot, Conservative
Last comment by Funkentelecky 3 years, 2 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form


When the weapons hunters failed to find stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, so began one of the greatest slanders on a president in history: “Bush lied, people died.”

Never mind that, in building the case for war in Iraq, President George W. Bush relied on the unanimous opinion of all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies.

Never mind that the bipartisan Robb-Silberman commission examined the intelligence on which Bush relied, and unanimously found that "the Intelligence Community did not make or change any analytic judgments in response to political pressure. … We conclude that it was the paucity of intelligence and poor analytical tradecraft, rather than political pressure, that produced the inaccurate pre-war intelligence assessments."

Never mind that Bush retained the same CIA director, George Tenet, who served under Bill Clinton. Tenet gave Bush the same intelligence assessment: that Saddam Hussein, the dictator of Iraq, possessed WMD is a “slam dunk.” Indeed, according to The Washington Post’s Bob Woodward, Bush was initially skeptical of the intelligence that reached that conclusion. When, on December 21, 2002, Tenet laid out the intelligence purportedly showing the existence of WMD stockpiles, Bush said, “This is the best we’ve got?”

Never mind that former secretary of State Hillary Clinton, then a New York senator, was particularly adamant about the threat posed by Saddam: "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical- and biological-weapons stock, his missile-delivery capability and his nuclear program. … If left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.”

Finally, never mind about then-President Bill Clinton’s Persian Gulf expert on the National Security Council, Kenneth Pollack. While he opposed the war’s timing, Pollack said “no one doubted” Saddam’s stockpiles of WMD: "The intelligence community convinced me and the rest of the Clinton Administration that Saddam had reconstituted his WMD programs following the withdrawal of the U.N. inspectors, in 1998, and was only a matter of years away from having a nuclear weapon. ... Other nations' intelligence services were similarly aligned with U.S. views. ... Germany ... Israel, Russia, Britain, China and even France held positions similar to that of the United States. ... In sum, no one doubted that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction."

“Bush lied, people died” -- or some version of it -- was uttered at the highest levels in the opposition party. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., called W. a “loser” and a “liar.” He later apologized -- for the “loser” part. Liar stands. The so-called Lion of the Senate, Ted Kennedy, bellowed, “Before the war, week after week after week after week, we were told lie after lie after lie after lie.”

If Bush is a “liar,” having relied in good faith on the unanimous opinion of the U.S. intelligence agencies, what do you call President Barack Obama? In building the case for Obamacare, Obama promised: “No matter how we reform health care, we will keep this promise to the American people:If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor. Period. If you like your healthcare plan, you will be able to keep your healthcare plan. Period. No one will take it away. No matter what.”

Did Obama “lie”?

Obama’s healthcare team, according to NBC News, knew that more than half of the people who buy their plans on the individual market would lose their plan: “Millions of Americans are getting or are about to get cancellation letters for their health insurance under Obamacare, say experts, and the Obama administration has known that for at least three years.”

NBC News’ sources estimated that 50 to 80 percent of Americans who buy individual insurance will find their policies cancelled, because those existing policies don’t meet Obamacare standards. And for many of those -- now forced to buy new policies -- the price tag will give them “sticker shock.”

The Affordable Care Act stated that an insurance policy in effect before March 23, 2010, was to be grandfathered in -- provided insurance companies have made no “significant change“ to the plan. But if the plan, say, had a change to the deductible, co-pay or benefits, the plan was no longer eligible to be grandfathered, and the policyholder would have to purchase a new plan.

Obamacare’s July 2010 regulations included an estimate that “40 to 67 percent” of customers wouldn’t be able to keep their policy because of normal annual turnover in the individual insurance market. And, because many policies will have been changed since the March 23, 2010, date, “the percentage of individual market policies losing grandfather status in a given year exceeds the 40 to 67 percent range.” Yet Obama continued to tell Americans that no one would lose their plan or doctor, a promise without which Obamacare would never have passed.

For his part, Obama now says: “What we said was, you can keep it if it hasn’t changed since the law passed.” A lie is an untruth told with intent to deceive.

Bush didn’t “lie.”

http://www.larryelder.com/b/Bush-Iraq-War-Vs.-Obama-Obamacare----Who-Lied/-165567423932335856.html


Latest Activity: Nov 08, 2013 at 8:18 PM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by Funkentelecky
Send Funkentelecky a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (721) times.

Funkentelecky commented on Friday, Nov 08, 2013 at 20:43 PM

Hillary had Obama’s 411 in 2008!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWoHV0...

Sheran commented on Friday, Nov 08, 2013 at 20:46 PM

Great blog! YOU GO Funk...☺

Funkentelecky commented on Friday, Nov 08, 2013 at 23:52 PM

The greatest campaigner in US history; however we needed a great leader with experience, and contrition, a leader who would take responsibility for his or her actions or inactions.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfl55G...

timeontarget commented on Saturday, Nov 09, 2013 at 07:08 AM

Good blog and two good video clips from youtube, Thank you both.

Meaningful info.

Funkentelecky commented on Sunday, Nov 10, 2013 at 17:16 PM

Thanks for your support Sheran and TOT!

Funkentelecky commented on Tuesday, Nov 12, 2013 at 05:07 AM

Thanks Chief, almost forgot about this blog with all the recent postings.

PN and Jimmy WRU?


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by Funkentelecky
 
Washington Post flat-out lies to cover for Meryl S
January 11, 2017
Washington Post flat-out lies to cover for Meryl Streep's slander that Trump mocked a disabled reporter Not even arguable. Meryl Streep should understand this well. It's Hollywood's specialty to use images and clever editing to make things appear to be what they actually are not. This is what the movies ...
Read More »
 
The NAACP Stoops to New Low with Jeff Sessions Sit
January 10, 2017
The NAACP Stoops to New Low with Jeff Sessions Sit-In Protest By Raynard Jackson Once again, the radical liberal National Association for the Advancement of “Certain” People (NAACP) has proven that Blacks can indeed sellout their own people and even be extremely hypocritical. The NAACP’s perpetual promotion to the Black ...
Read More »
 
Chicago: The Democratic Murder Capital Of America!
January 04, 2017
Chicago: The Democratic Murder Capital Of America! – Lunch Alert! Click Here to give me your thoughts and continue the discussion. Please forward this email to any friends or family who may be interested in viewing my video commentary! Thanks for watching, Dick http://www.dickmorris.com/chicago-democratic-murder-capital-america-lunch-alert/
Read More »
 
How To Repeal ObamaCare
January 04, 2017
A recent column by Heather R. Higgins and Phil Kerpen really points the way to how to get rid of this obnoxious program. Their ideas are similar to ones I have ventured in this space. Zero fund the fines for failure to buy insurance or offer it to one’s workers. ...
Read More »
 
For Democrats, 2017 Will Be The Year of Living Stu
January 03, 2017
For Democrats, 2017 Will Be The Year of Living Stupidly If you thought 2016 was packed full of liberal foolishness, just wait until you get a load of 2017. As 2016 ends, progressives enter the New Year terrified that Donald Trump will continue to run circles around them, and their ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology