[Report Abuse]
[Login to Blog] PoliticsNation's Blog
Fox-Can-Lie Lawsuit-Fox News is built on lies!
Last comment by Funkentelecky 1 year, 5 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

If Fox want to claim to be a news station, and moreover to be fair and balanced, it isn’t unreasonable to expect that they will take precautions against broadcasting misleading or downright false facts. If they want to report lies, then they shouldn’t claim to be a news station.

Free speech has reasonable limits – if you don’t believe me, try joking with the security people next time you fly that you have a bomb in your suitcase. If a person can’t make a stupid but essentially harmless joke, then how on earth can anyone justify a news station fabricating or falsifying news stories as being about “free speech”?

eople frequently refer to a court case that Fox won, which essentially gives the media the right to lie. This came from an appellate court decision that states that the FCC’s news distortion policy does not qualify as a rule, law, or regulation.

From Wikipedia:

Jane Akre and her husband Steve Wilson are former employees of Fox owned-and-operated station WTVT in Tampa, Florida. In 1997, they were fired from the station after refusing to knowingly include false information in their report concerning the Monsanto Company’s production of RBGH, a drug designed to make cows produce more milk. They successfully sued under Florida’s whistle blower law and were awarded a US $425,000 settlement by jury decision. However, Fox appealed to an appellate court and won, after the court declared that the FCC policy against falsification that Fox violated was just a policy and not a “law, rule, or regulation”, and so the whistle blower law did not apply.

The court agreed with WTVT’s (Fox) argument “that the FCC’s policy against the intentional falsification of the news — which the FCC has called its “news distortion policy” — does not qualify as the required “law, rule, or regulation” under section 448.102.[...] Because the FCC’s news distortion policy is not a “law, rule, or regulation” under section 448.102, Akre has failed to state a claim under the whistle-blower’s statute.”[1]

In 2001, Jane Akre and her husband won the Goldman Environmental Prize as a recognition for their report on RBGH. [2]

In 2004, Fox filed a US$1.7 million counter-suit against Akre and Wilson for trial fees and costs. Akre and Wilson both appear in a major portion of the 2004/5 critical documentary, The Corporation.

In 2007 Jane became the editor-in-chief of the national news desk at InjuryBoard.com.[3]

From FoxBGHSuit.com:

Fox appealed and prevailed February 14, 2003 when an appeals court issued a ruling reversing the jury, accepting a defense argument that had been rejected by three other judges on at least six separate occasions…

The whistle-blowing journalists, twice refused Fox offers of big-money deals to keep quiet about what they knew, filed their landmark lawsuit April 2, 1998 and survived three Fox efforts to have their case summarily dismissed. It is the first time journalists have used a whistleblower law to seek a legal remedy for being fired by for refusing to distort the news. Steve and Jane are now considering an appeal to the Florida state Supreme Court.

From CeaseSpin.com:

Appellate Court Rules Media Can Legally Lie.
By Mike Gaddy. Published Feb. 28, 2003

The court did not dispute the heart of Akre’s claim, that Fox pressured her to broadcast a false story to protect the broadcaster from having to defend the truth in court, as well as suffer the ire of irate advertisers. Fox argued from the first, and failed on three separate occasions, in front of three different judges, to have the case tossed out on the grounds there is no hard, fast, and written rule against deliberate distortion of the news.

The attorneys for Fox, owned by media baron Rupert Murdoch, argued the First Amendment gives broadcasters the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on the public airwaves.

In its six-page written decision, the Court of Appeals held that the Federal Communications Commission position against news distortion is only a “policy,” not a promulgated law, rule, or regulation. Fox aired a report after the ruling saying it was “totally vindicated” by the verdict.


Latest Activity: Oct 22, 2013 at 3:57 PM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by PoliticsNation
Send PoliticsNation a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (426) times.

PoliticsNation commented on Tuesday, Oct 22, 2013 at 16:06 PM
icyman61 commented on Friday, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:50 AM

I think all media has an agenda to push, and they give their "side" the news they want to hear even though it maybe one sided. Thats why everyone needs to do their OWN research about important subjects!

Funkentelecky commented on Saturday, Oct 26, 2013 at 18:38 PM

Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by PoliticsNation
 
Coming to America: Who Was First?
April 10, 2015
Who discovered America? For most of us, the answer to that question is straightforward: Christopher Columbus. That's what we were taught in school and that is why we celebrate Columbus Day. Yet it is far from clear-cut. There are alternative theories about who got here first — some well-documented, others ...
Read More »
 
Ferguson Residents--Taking control of their City
April 08, 2015
Ferguson Election Results: Two New Black Members On Council, Voter Turnout Doubles Ferguson has about 21,000 residents, but has only had two black council members since its incorporation in 1894, including Councilman Dwayne James, who was not up for re-election. The newly elected Bell, a professor and local magistrate, represents ...
Read More »
 
Finally-Cop Charged With Murder for a Black Life!!
April 07, 2015
This case started off like every other case that Involves a minority being gunned down by the police. The conservatives were yelling he attacked the cop and got what he deserved! If not for this video another black man would have lost his life and once again been blamed for ...
Read More »
 
Judge Approves Serving Divorce Papers Via Facebook
April 07, 2015
Social media is being taken to another level. A Manhattan Supreme Court justice says a 26-year-old woman can serve her estranged husband with divorce papers in a Facebook message. Read why this decision was made--Do you agree/disagree with the judge below. DETAILS http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/brooklyn/exclusive-woman-facebook-serve-divorce-papers-article-1.2174577
Read More »
 
Pres.Obama&Hillary-Voted Most Admired in the World
April 05, 2015
Charles Topher April 5th 2015 They call him a Kenyan Muslim Socialist Marxist Communist Dictator. The lies and disrespect they’ve spread about him are unprecedented of any other President in history. All the while, his approval ratings grow. He smirks and shrugs it off while his policies and actions continue ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology