Soooooo....let the food stamp program cuts be accompanied by farm subsidy cuts. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
Of course - SNAP "welfare" when used for food feeds individuals while farms feed the nation. But where the welfare state is concerned, all must suffer if we are to get a handle on government spending.
I seriously doubt that the ONLY people in government who benefit from farm subsidies are Republicans. I say cut 'em all. The Dems need to feel the pain, too. In addition, cut their health care subsidy and make every single member of our national representative government participate in ObamaCare.
Then they'll REALLY feel our pain.
so basically, the farmers pay the republicans to vote their way, and the democrats pay thru food stamps to get the lower income people to vote theirs. what's the difference?
PN, Why only list Republicans? Are you saying they are the only ones who receive farm subsidies? I suspect that just as many Democrats receive the same subsidies. However, they will never agree to cut welfare benefits because they don't want to lose the votes. When the average amount of welfare payouts are around $25,00 a year and as high as $47,000 where is the incentive to better themselves? Great article in the Savannah Morning News a couple of Sundays' ago concerning welfare benefits. Kind of an eye-opener.
@gacpl-the difference is their trying to keep their subsidy's but deny others 200 a month in food-stamps.
@Wayne-I focused on Republicans because their the ones trying to end food stamps, and their message is we don't like hand outs but their receiving them. They receive more subsidy than any hungry family would receive.
I honestly believe a lot of people will not make it to the pearly gates because they thought it was okay to line the pockets of the rich and not feed others when they are hungry. Are you aware that most households that receive food-stamps have children in the home? I believe a lot of people that call themselves men and woman of God but think it's okay to let people starve will have to answer for there choice in more than one way.
the difference is none, they are both whoring themselves out for votes and money without regard for what's right for america.
@gacpl-there will always be poor among us. America was built on the foundation of taking care of their own. I'm doing very well for myself but I don't look down on people that are not. I give and I always end up receiving more than I gave. I'm in good health, nice home, children are doing well and I'm sitting in my sun room,enjoying the breeze looking at my well manicured lawn (thank you Sarge lawn care)...I'm living very well. I thank God for everything, I volunteer, I feed the homeless and I donate my clothing to the Kirk healing center. I think I've been blessed because I give and I believe in helping others. I don't think I would be in the position that I'm in if I didn't believe in helping those in need.
1 John 3:17
If anyone has material possessions and sees a brother or sister in need but has no pity on them, how can the love of God be that person?
Corporate Example of Giving and Receiving
Walmart defends its poor labor practices as necessary to keep prices down. But as Walmart’s sales dropped with its payrolls, other retailers have proven that treating workers well is not mutually exclusive to a good deal. Walmart’s competitor, Costco, offers its employees an average wage of $21.96 an hour, about 40 percent more than Walmart employees make. Costco enjoyed a 19 percent increase in profits last quarter as Walmart sank, generating much more revenue and profit per worker. WinCo, a smaller grocery chain based in Idaho, boasts full health benefits for anyone working over 24 hours a week and retirement accounts for more than 400 workers — while maintaining prices even lower than Walmart’s.
"the difference is none, they are both whoring themselves out for votes and money without regard for what's right for america."
I’m sorry but PN’s rational is flawed and really doesn’t work in a free society. Charity and giving amongst Americans used to be something widespread through families, churches and other distinguished organizations. People were more responsible for themselves by not having ridiculous numbers of children without a father in tow to guide and provide. Free markets and trade set wages not the government and just because one company can afford to pay their employees X amount of money doesn’t mean that another can do so as well. It’s very admiral that your family is doing well and you give as you do PN, but it isn’t your right to submit your will on others just as God the almighty supports too. The deity wants’ you to come to him or do for others on your free will, not by gunpoint (The Feds). Conservatives give more time and money to charity, the poor than any other group in America; especially Democrats. It is more likely that your family is as successful as it is because of the conservative values and principles you have inspite of your political philosophy. I’ve already mentioned to you and posted how poor my family was and our living conditions and you deleted the blog. The goal is to get people off food stamps and into a job to support the country and do your fair share for society as God would wish it to be.
I forgot to mention that this bill passed by a bipartisan vote and the President threatens to veto it; however Obamacare passed without a single Republican vote in the House or Senate and he signed it even though he said you can't pass healthcare with a 50+1 vote. Jimmy, has he taken over the moniker of "Boy King" GWB passed bipartisan bills.