Gee Funk: Boy??? Isn't that close to calling him the N word?
Besides, iT is I, JimmyMack, who lays claim here in blog cyberspace to the moniker: BOY KING and its historical reference to W. and his minions for stealing the 2000 election after losing the popular vote.
On another note: you sure do stay up late.
Hi, Jimmy its not my intentions to be calling him the N word.
I realize that you named Dubya "BOY KING" because you feel he and his minions stole the 2000 election. Didn't the Supreme Court make that decision?
However In my view Obama has taken over that title wholeheartedly by using executive orders to provide amnesty for Foreign nationals, appointment of Czars, delaying Obamacare employee mandates without Congressional approval to do so. He is also the 1st President to have Major legislation passed without a bipartisan vote(Obamacare). This bill would have never passed without a Democrat Progressive Super Majority in the House. The even buried a Superior bill HR3400 in committee instead of sending it to the floor for a vote which would have culminated in resounding passage in a bipartisan way. You can disagree with Dubya all day long, but at least the tax cuts and wars were passed in a bipartisan Congress without Super Majorities. That's a true leader in my book.
Well Funk, you rate an A+ when it comes to articulating the Conservative Perspective. I was just interested in the usage of the word BOY when it comes to an adult Black Male. AM I wrong in my assessment in the use of that word, BOY?
Great example Chief; however I'm 99.9% sure Jimmy meant no malice in the way he asked the question. Jimmy, you can call me Boy all you want I feel that I can sense when someone uses it negatively against me. And in your question to me, you didn't. I understand that you were focusing on the "word" not me.
You are correct Funk. I was not referring to YOU as BOY. I was just questioning your use of the term describing BHO.
Sebe: correcto mundo on the comma placement. It slanted the point I was trying to make.
Funk ain't no Boy.
Here’s more phoniness from August 9, 2013. This phony knows that he’s disingenuous however the uniformed, will never acknowledge that a Superior bill in July 2009 HR3400 was buried by Democrat rule and that Doctor Tom Price has re-introduced it, HR2300.
Here’s even more phoniness:
Charlie Rangel agrees too:
A Truly Great Phony!