[Report Abuse]
[Login to Blog] Funkentelecky's Blog
Obama’s Hustle
SFC (RET) U.S. Army Combat Veteran, Patriot, Conservative
Last comment by HMJC 3 years, 4 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

Has the middle class caught on to Obama's hustle yet?
Published by: Dan Calabrese

There's one born every minute.
Let's start by defining a hustle. Someone is pulling a hustle on you when they constantly try to convince you they offer something that is actually illusory. The hustle can become a career for them if you keep buying it, but in order for that to happen the hustler has to very skillfully convince you that your lack of reward is because of some sinister outside force working against the hustler. If the hustler can pull this off, he can prevent you from recognizing that the offer itself is empty.
That basically describes Barack Obama's relationship with the American middle class. He talks about them endlessly, and constantly derides his political opponents for supposedly favoring everyone but them. But as the Wall Street Journal points out, Obama's actual policies have done nothing but decimate the very middle class they claim to favor. That's because spreading the wealth, rather than focusing on growth, kills opportunity:
What about the middle class that is the focus of Mr. Obama's rhetoric? Each month the consultants at Sentier Research crunch the numbers from the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey and estimate the trend in median annual household income adjusted for inflation. In its May 2013 report, Sentier put the figure at $51,500, essentially unchanged from $51,671 a year earlier.
And that's the good news. The bad news is that median real household income is $2,718, or 5%, lower than the $54,218 median in June 2009 when the recession officially ended. Median incomes typically fall during recessions. But the striking fact of the Obama economy is that median real household income has fallen even during the recovery.
While the declines have stabilized over the last two years, incomes are still far below the previous peak located by Sentier of $56,280 in January 2008. No wonder Mr. Obama is now turning once again to his familiar political narrative assailing inequality and blaming everyone else for it. He wants to change the subject from the results on his watch.
The core problem has been Mr. Obama's focus on spreading the wealth rather than creating it. ObamaCare will soon hook more Americans on government subsidies, but its mandates and taxes have hurt job creation, especially at small businesses. Mr. Obama's record tax increases have grabbed a bigger chunk of affluent incomes, but they created uncertainty for business throughout 2012 and have dampened growth so far this year.
Annualized GDP growth of just 2 percent, which has been the sad hallmark of this administration's economic performance, simply does not create enough jobs, wealth or opportunity to lift the middle class into a better economic situation. Worse: As the Journal points out, because so much of the growth we have experienced has come from the stock market, the sad irony of Obama's policies is that the rich are doing just fine but the middle class are running in place.
The answer to this, liberals will say, is even more redistribution. They will point out that there is money sitting around, and rich people and corporations need to start spending it - hiring people, buying goods, contracting out services, etc. This is the Keynesian "demand side" view of economics - that you can't have demand unless people have money to spend, so the key to growth is to put money in the hands of people who need things, then sit back and watch them spend it.
But the problem with this is that it doesn't create wealth at all. It just attempts to move existing wealth around. The reason corporations sit on cash reserves is that they're looking for ways to invest the cash that will help them grow and become more prosperous. In the Obama economy of 2 percent annualized growth, they don't see it. Obama wants them to hire people just because they have money, but companies don't hire people just because "they can afford it." They hire people because the investment will bring a return. You don't increase wages because of what you think people will spend the money on. You increase wages because the value you directly receive back from the worker results in sufficient return on investment.
That's how you get real growth. That's how you get real wealth creation, and that's when the middle class does well. Democrats are so invested in their class-warfare narrative, they would rather die than admit it's good for the middle class when corporations and rich people do well. They demand that corporations hire, then saddle those who do with additional burdens like ObamaCare and unionization - only to act shocked and befuddled when hiring slows to a crawl or stops.
Yet there is Obama once again, telling the middle class that all they need is more of his "redistributive justice," which is why he is once again vowing to go to war on their behalf against the rich and corporations - the very people who actually could provide the middle class with opportunities if Obama would stop bludgeoning them.
At some point, enough of the middle class will catch on to the hustle that it won't be able to continue, and we will see a shifting of the political grounds. I don't know exactly when that will happen, but I hope it comes before a hustler even more disingenuous than Obama has the chance to take the reins.

http://us-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=8t6m59ir1qhol



Latest Activity: Jul 28, 2013 at 9:34 PM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by Funkentelecky
Send Funkentelecky a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (584) times.

Funkentelecky commented on Sunday, Jul 28, 2013 at 21:41 PM

I recognize the hustle, do you?

HMJC commented on Monday, Jul 29, 2013 at 08:50 AM

I have from the beginning Funky but I guess some people prefer dancing to prosperity...


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by Funkentelecky
 
2011 video: Trump works as bellhop, dog walker,
November 30, 2016
2011 video: Trump works as bellhop, dog walker, bathroom cleaner in his hotel "Am I allowed to accept tips?" Let's not pretend this is anything more than what it is. It's staged, of course, and it's anyone's guess how many takes they had to shoot to get the footage they ...
Read More »
 
These numbers should SHUT UP liberals
November 30, 2016
These numbers should SHUT UP liberals about the Electoral College once and for all By Michele Hickford, Editor-in-Chief5:10pm November 29, 2016 The keening and caterwauling we’ve been treated to by the left since Hillary Clinton’s defeat has been monumental. Most entertaining has been the snowflake retreat to “safe spaces” with ...
Read More »
 
2016 Turkey of the Year
November 24, 2016
ESPN First Take HD - Stephen A. Smith Sounds Off On Colin Kaepernick . Published on Nov 9, 2016 ESPN First Take HD - Stephen A. Smith Sounds Off On Colin Kaepernick ESPN First Take Today Full Show 11/9/2016 - Molly Qerim Joins Stephen A Smith & Skip Bayless as ...
Read More »
 
What Difference Does It Make?
November 24, 2016
Hillary Clinton & James Comey - What Difference Does It Make? Published on Oct 17, 2016 Hillary Clinton's use of a personal email server while serving as Secretary of State is not only an enduring political scandal, it's also a new hit song. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIARMMtUdZQ
Read More »
 
Clinton Staffer Says I Could “Grab [Her] Ass” and
November 04, 2016
HIDDEN CAM: Clinton Staffer Says I Could “Grab [Her] Ass” and Not Get Fired Published on Oct 12, 2016 In this video released by Project Veritas Action, James O’Keefe exposes the “misogynistic” nature of the Hillary Clinton campaign and its organizers, who joke about sexually harassing women and committing voter ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology