[Report Abuse]
[Login to Blog] Funkentelecky's Blog
Big Government
SFC USA, (RET)
Last comment by Funkentelecky 3 years ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

Someone did an experiment to test an old tale -- that a frog placed in a pot of cool water, which is then slowly and continuously heated, will be boiled to death. By contrast, if thrown directly into scalding hot water, the frog jumps out. But it turns out that, no, once the water got hot enough, the critter hopped out of Dodge.
This raises a question. At what point does the continuous growth and intrusiveness of government make people wake up? This is not just a matter of theory or philosophy. People are hurting -- as a direct result of President Barack Obama, his party and the inability of the GOP to make the case for a smaller, less expensive and less intrusive government.
For five years, we have watched as President Barack Obama successfully pushed the following redistributionist agenda for building an economy: Take from the most productive to “stimulate” the economy by redistributing money, often with political consideration involved or attached; allow bureaucrats to pick winners and losers in the market; issue feel-good, top-down regulations that cost jobs and do little to improve conditions; and dictate the terms of health care with ObamaCare, a monstrosity that places one-seventh of our economy under the control of the federal government.
The results are in.
This is the worst economic recovery since World War II. Unemployment remains high. So many able-bodied people are dropping out of the labor force that the “labor force participation rate” remains near a 30-year low.
In 1900, government at all three levels took about 10 percent of our income. Today, government takes nearly 50 percent, or twice as much as people say government should. Yet when pollsters ask Americans how much money should government, at all three levels -- state, local and federal -- take from them, their answer has been consistent for decades: 25 percent.
Why, then, aren’t politicians in Washington, D.C., cowering under their desks, as angry constituents pound on their doors?
People, in the abstract, talk about freedom and liberty. But government dependency is so widespread that we accept the benefits -- unaware that the costs are much higher than we think.
Nearly half of the federal budget goes to the three major entitlement programs: Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. All of these programs address problems that the Constitution never intended. How do we know? Earlier presidents, citing constitutional reasons, rejected congressional attempts at growing the government.
In 1822, James Monroe, our fifth president, cast his only veto in rejecting an expansion of the Cumberland Road, even through it stood to economically benefit his home state of Virginia.
According to Monroe's biography on the University of Virginia's americanpresident.org: “Although Monroe personally supported the idea of internal improvements, he balked at the federal government’s role in the American System being proposed by Congressmen Henry Clay and John C. Calhoun. They wanted a series of federally financed projects designed to improve and update the nation’s roads, bridges and canals. Monroe worried, however, that federal payments for such internal improvements would expand even further the power of the federal government at the sake of state power. Where would the limits be drawn?”
Economist Walter Williams writes of Presidents James Madison, Franklin Pierce and Grover Cleveland, and how they quoted the Constitution to turn away congressional attempts to spend money because, they argued, the federal government is unauthorized to do so.
Fast forward to ObamaCare and the Supreme Court. Twenty-six states sued over the law, arguing that the individual insurance mandate -- which requires every citizen in the country to purchase health care insurance or face a fine starting in 2014 -- was unconstitutional. But the court, citing Congress’ authority to tax, let the mandate stand. In their dissent, Justices Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito said, “The entire Act before us is invalid in its entirety.” Further, they wrote, there is a "mountain of evidence" that the mandate is not a tax. "To say that the individual mandate merely imposes a tax,” wrote Scalia, “is not to interpret the statute but to rewrite it."
In the end, of course, we get the government we vote for. Given that information gets filtered out through the Axis of Indoctrination -- Hollywood, academia and media -- how much hope is there that people will wake up?
The smart, the well-connected and the well-educated will be fine. Their previously depressed stock portfolios have returned, as companies learn to do more with fewer workers. High-end real estate is back, and the top 1 percent has regained the wealth lost during the recession -- and then some.
The very people whom the left says it cares about are hurting. But rest assured, these elites care about them. They just have a strange way of showing it.


http://www.larryelder.com/b/Big-Government:-What-does-it-take-for-America-to-Wake-Up/-942056371374027523.html



Latest Activity: Jul 25, 2013 at 10:26 PM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by Funkentelecky
Send Funkentelecky a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (472) times.

SportsFan31313 commented on Friday, Jul 26, 2013 at 00:50 AM

Hey Funk,

I never asked, but I will now. Are you Republican?

Funkentelecky commented on Friday, Jul 26, 2013 at 05:30 AM

SF3 no, I'm not a Republican. However I am for the rule of law.

Funkentelecky commented on Friday, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:15 AM

Hey SF3,

I never asked, but I will now. Are you Black?

Funkentelecky commented on Friday, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:00 PM

The worst recovery of a Recession since the Great Depression.


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by Funkentelecky
 
Trump on "Rigged System"
July 13, 2016
Bernie now 'part of the rigged system' he claims to hate Bernie the sell-out hypocrite sells out. Today, Bernie took his campaign out behind the shed, shot it, carved its corpse into steaks, and fed it to Hillary Clinton. For months, and as recently as April, Sanders was wailing about ...
Read More »
 
Trump's 3 Challenges
June 29, 2016
Trump's 3 Challenges: Himself, Media and Republicans After finally getting the endorsement of House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Donald Trump frittered the goodwill away. Trump called a judge born in Indiana a "Mexican." Rather than apologize, Trump, at first, doubled and triple down, ...
Read More »
 
After Orlando
June 23, 2016
The kind of country we want to be It did not take long for President Barack Obama to inject a plea for more gun control in his reaction to the Orlando terror massacre. In his five-minute, no-questions-taken-statement, Obama said: "Today marks the most deadly shooting in American history. The shooter ...
Read More »
 
The Gun Control Farce
June 21, 2016
Surely murder is a serious subject, which ought to be examined seriously. Instead, it is almost always examined politically in the context of gun control controversies, with stock arguments on both sides that have remained the same for decades. And most of those arguments are irrelevant to the central question: ...
Read More »
 
Obama by the numbers
June 15, 2016
The real numbers, that is. “By almost every economic measure — every economic measure, America is better off when I — better off than when I came here. That is the truth. That’s true.” - President Obama June 1, 2016 That's not the first time President Obama has made that ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology