Dubya's Fourth Term Revisited?
"I Don't Mind A Parasite. I Object To A Cut-Rate One."
Last comment by sebekm 9 months, 2 weeks ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form


I read a very good opinion piece last night that was linked to at The Sludge Report. From the title and the first few paragraphs, you would think that it was a "hit piece" on the President written by one of those vast right-wingers. But it's not - and the writer fully illustrates the President's challenges and how he has responded in the areas of homeland and national security. I have given Mr. Obama high marks in these areas on this here blog site in the past, and this article makes my case better than I could. Since a direct link to the article at ft.com doesn't work (I think readers who link from Drudge access ft.com in a "special way"), I'll post the article in its entirety - to include the great cartoon caricature) - here:

"Obama and the crumbling of a liberal fantasy hero

By Gideon Rachman

The most vociferous critics expected far more than a mere mortal could deliver

It has taken a long time, but the world’s fantasies about Barack Obama are finally crumbling. In Europe, once the headquarters of the global cult of Obama, the disillusionment is particularly bitter. Monday’s newspapers were full of savage quotes about the perfidy of the Obama-led US.

Der Spiegel, the German magazine that alleged that America’s National Security Agency has bugged the EU’s offices, thundered that “the NSA’s totalitarian ambition ... affects us all ... A constitutional state cannot allow it. None of us can allow it.” President François Hollande of France has demanded that the alleged spying stop immediately. Le Monde, Mr Hollande’s home-town newspaper, has even suggested that the EU should consider giving political asylum to Edward Snowden, the NSA whistleblower.

But if liberals wanted to compile a list of perfidious acts by the Obama administration, the case of the bugged EU fax machine should probably come low down the list.

More important would be the broken promise to close the Guantánamo detention centre and – above all – the massive expansion of the use of drone strikes to kill suspected terrorists in Pakistan, Yemen and elsewhere, It has gradually dawned on President Obama’s foreign fan club that their erstwhile hero is using methods that would be bitterly denounced if he were a white Republican. As Hakan Altinay, a Turkish academic, complained to me last week: “Obama talks like the president of the American Civil Liberties Union but he acts like Dick Cheney.”

It is not just Mr Obama’s record on security issues that disappoints the likes of Mr Altinay. Liberals in Turkey, Egypt, Russia, Iran and elsewhere complain that the US president has been far too hesitant about condemning human rights abuses in their countries. Or to adapt Mr Altinay’s complaint: when it comes to foreign policy, Mr Obama campaigned with the human rights rhetoric of Jimmy Carter but has governed like Henry Kissinger.

Yet those who argue that the world was duped and Mr Obama is simply a fraud are making a mistake. Before disappearing into a lather of anger and disappointment, the president’s critics should consider some counter-arguments.

First, some of the decisions that Mr Obama has made that liberals hate are partly a result of some other decisions that they liked. Foreigners have largely applauded the Obama administration’s decision to wind down the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. But, if you are not going to go after your enemies on the ground, you may need other methods. Mr Obama’s controversial expansion of the drone strike programme is closely linked to his reluctance to deploy troops on the ground.

Similarly, Mr Obama has rightly received some credit for his decision to end torture of terrorist suspects, including such practices as waterboarding. But the need to gather information on terror threats remains – and the massive expansion of electronic monitoring is partly a response to that.

Europeans respond that bugging the EU’s Washington office has nothing to do with the “war on terror”. True enough – but is it really so surprising that allies sometimes eavesdrop on each other? The British have occasionally debated whether they should spy on the Americans – and only turned the idea down on the grounds that they would inevitably be caught, causing severe damage to the “special relationship”. The French are thought to have conducted commercial espionage, aimed at America. The Israelis spied on the US – as the conviction of their agent, Jonathan Pollard, confirmed.

The current European backlash against Mr Obama is reminiscent of a similar process of disillusionment undergone by American liberals in recent years. In one column, Maureen Dowd of the New York Times compared Mr Obama unfavourably to a fictional president, portrayed by Michael Douglas, in a film. This drew a sharp response from Mr Obama when, in a recent speech, he called out to Mr Douglas – “Michael, what’s your secret, man. Could it be that you were an actor, an Aaron Sorkin liberal fantasy?”

It is not entirely Mr Obama’s fault that he became the vessel into which liberals all over the world poured their fantasies. Of course, like any politician, he pumped up expectations when running for office. But when Obama-mania really took off in 2008, it swiftly moved into a realm beyond reason. What was candidate Obama meant to say to the 200,000 Berliners who turned out to cheer him that year – “Go home guys, this is silly”? When the new president was given the Nobel Peace Prize, simply for existing, all he could do was graciously accept.

It is perfectly legitimate to argue that Mr Obama should have done more to cut back the rapidly growing secret state that he inherited when he took office. The combination of a “war on terror” and the new world of “big data” has created possibilities and pressures – and Mr Obama may have made some wrong calls in response. Yet the US president has had to balance a variety of pressures – including the continuing existence of a terrorist threat and the entrenched power of the intelligence world.

Mr Obama was living in a real universe, full of hard choices. It was his overheated critics who lived in a fantasy world.

gideon.rachman@ft.com"

And IMHO - Mr. Obama has dealt with that "real universe, full of hard choices" in homeland and national security particularly well. Why? Because in order to keep America safe and champion our national and homeland security interests, one HAS to "act like Dick Cheney" and "govern like Henry Kissinger" - whether the liberals like it or not.

In the areas of homeland and national security, the President has governed...well...like a REPUBLICAN, which - IMHO - is best for us all.


Latest Activity: Jul 02, 2013 at 11:38 AM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by sebekm
Send sebekm a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (353) times.

PoliticsNation commented on Tuesday, Jul 02, 2013 at 16:08 PM

The POTUS is doing a great job governing homeland and national security. The GOP threw everything at him but the kitchen sink when they tried to discredit his success on homeland and national security issues in the last election (Benghazi) The Left is usually perceived as weak when it comes to Homeland security/war on terror issues. That theory is a known talking point for the GOP in elections.

JimmyMack commented on Tuesday, Jul 02, 2013 at 16:32 PM

The right is growing more desperate each passing day that BHO is in office and his legislation is martriculating thru the legislative branches. He has successfully manuevered the Conservatives into a possible big loss situation if they cannot get the immigration bill thru the House. They will be perceived as anti-hispanic. Yea, I know how things go, but that's just the way it is.

If the Republicans cannot control the Tea Partiers within their ranks then we will be looking at the GOP imploding and morphing into something else.

PoliticsNation commented on Tuesday, Jul 02, 2013 at 16:38 PM

He has also successfully maneuvered the Conservatives into a possible big loss situation by calling them out on the student loan issue(rate have doubled). Students and Hispanics will play a major role in the 2014/2016 election...

JimmyMack commented on Tuesday, Jul 02, 2013 at 18:01 PM

Yes PN. As some of us know: It is indeed a New World Charlie Brown.

sebekm commented on Tuesday, Jul 02, 2013 at 21:37 PM

Benghazi exists - and there were big mistakes AND a cover-up. The GOP has and will continue to get traction and mileage on the issue until the truth finally is known.

Funkentelecky commented on Wednesday, Jul 03, 2013 at 09:38 AM

Benghazi exists - and there were big mistakes AND a cover-up. The GOP has and will continue to get traction and mileage on the issue until the truth finally is known.
Chief, you are correct; Benghazi is real and isn’t going away. From using military force without congressional approval “BHO” to down Khadafy which led to weaker security to protect our ambassador at the embassy, to no security on 9/11 when the embassy was attacked after the ambassador had requested more security as late as August 2011. Hillary Clinton got the call from Greg Hicks with the attack in progress; what did she do, and where and what was the President doing. When Bin Laden was killed it is very clear of where and what they were doing. How do honest Americans discount these facts just because they agree with someone politically or even some cases because of race? Benghazi was a failure because of inexperience, mistakes and cover-up.

And let’s give credit where credit is due in the fact that BHO has continued in most parts what GWB initiated in Homeland and National Security to keep us safe.

sebekm commented on Tuesday, Jul 09, 2013 at 18:50 PM

Yes he has.


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by sebekm
 
"Facts, Schmacts" Or Trolling For Controversy
April 23, 2014
Slate Magazine is a liberal publication that was started in 1996 by the former editor of New Republic, Michael Kinsley. In 2004, Slate was purchased by the Washington Post, and is run today by an online group called Slate Group, a subsidiary of the Washington Post. In an article published ...
Read More »
 
A True "Double Standard"
April 23, 2014
Here's a story that has been flying under the lamestream media's radar for the past month or so. To their credit, USATODAY - a notably liberal publication - allowed Kirsten Powers' opinion piece to be published and headlined on their main web page last week. The subject of the story ...
Read More »
 
Polls ‘n” Politics
April 22, 2014
Here we go again. First – in the area of the polls: our friends at McClatchy, Rasmussen, and Democratic pollster Anderson Robbins Research/GOP pollster Shaw & Company are at it again, working hard to keep WE THE PEOPLE informed on the current state of political public opinion. *A recent poll ...
Read More »
 
If Jesus Was A Democrat
April 18, 2014
I stole the media graphic at left from another blog. Obviously, it is an attempt to portray Jesus in a warped and twisted way as A Republican That Democrats Love To Hate. But it got me to thinking, and what I came up with was an inspiration to meet silly ...
Read More »
 
Catching Up On Recent Polls And Politics
April 15, 2014
*In an article earlier this week, James Oliphant of the National Review pointed out that President Obama has begun to “say goodbye.” In his article, Oliphant provides his observations of the President and his party as Mr. Obama’s time in the White House winds down. Here are a few of ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology