[Report Abuse]
[Login to Blog] Funkentelecky's Blog
Obama Demonstrates the Evil of Big Government
SFC USA, (RET)

Take Me To Post Comment Form


The scandals surrounding the Obama administration come down to one common theme -- that the ever-growing size and scope of our federal government gives it enormous power over virtually every aspect of our lives, power that in the wrong hands can be used to reward supporters, exact revenge and punish enemies. In education, health care, transportation, energy, disaster relief, welfare, commerce, work and salary rules, and on and on, the federal government plays an outsized role completely inconsistent with the Founding Fathers’ notion of a limited government that allows maximum personal liberty.
In 1900, government at all three levels -- federal, state and local -- took about 10 percent of the people’s money. It now takes nearly 50 percent.
On what basis should Americans -- especially those who did not vote for Barack Obama -- feel that the President will guard their interests, especially when apparently vindictive actions have been taken under his watch?
The IRS admits to, and has apologized for, targeting conservative groups. The second article of impeachment against Richard Nixon accused him of using the IRS to go after political enemies. Incredibly, the IRS commissioner of the office in charge of tax-exempt organizations from 2009 to 2012 -- when the conservative groups were targeted -- is now the director of the IRS Affordable Care Act office, responsible for ObamaCare tax compliance.
The Justice Department, in apparent violation of policy, subpoenaed the phone records of as many as 100 reporters without notifying their employer, The Associated Press. And the DOJ subpoenaed the phone records of a Fox reporter, as well as the phone records of his parents.
Now every president fights with the media, whose job description supposedly requires them to serve as watchdog over government. It is why the First Amendment protects “freedom of the press.” But how many administrations have openly and repeatedly stated contempt for a particular news channel, the way Obama and his aides have publicly attacked the Fox News Channel?
Early in his administration, Obama complained, “I've got one television station entirely devoted to attacking my administration.” He told Rolling Stone: "The golden age of an objective press was a pretty narrow span of time in our history. Before that, you had folks like William Randolph Hearst who used their newspapers very intentionally to promote their viewpoints. I think Fox is part of that tradition -- it is part of the tradition that has a very clear, undeniable point of view. It's a point of view that I disagree with. It's a point of view that I think is ultimately destructive for the long-term growth of a country that has a vibrant middle class and is competitive in the world.”
Fox News is “ultimately destructive”?
Then-White House senior adviser David Axelrod said that the Fox News Channel was "not really a news station" and that much of the programming is "not really news." Similarly, former White House Communications Director Anita Dunn said about Fox: “We don’t need to pretend that this is the way that legitimate news organizations behave.”
A few days later, calling Fox “a wing of the Republican Party," Dunn said: "They take their talking points, put them on the air; take their opposition research, put them on the air. And that's fine. But let's not pretend they're a news network the way CNN is." Dunn also said, “I mean the reality of it is that Fox News often operates almost as either the research arm or the communications arm of the Republican Party,” and told Time Magazine: “It's opinion journalism masquerading as news. They are boosting their audience, but that doesn't mean we are going to sit back."
How despicable do Democrats find Republicans? A recent CNN poll found 76 percent of Democrats still believe President Bush “deliberately misled” the country into the Iraq War. And Obama defenders say Bush “used” the IRS to “target” the NAACP. Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., even offered up this Bush/Hurricane Katrina conspiracy: The President, you see, dragged his feet during Katrina so that black New Orleanians would leave the state and take their Democratic votes with them. Frank called this alleged Bush scheme “ethnic cleansing by inaction.”
What’s the answer? Tone down the rhetoric? Elect morally superior human beings? Vote for “common sense” moderates?
No. Let’s agree that neither side trusts “the other side.” Let’s agree that neither side thinks much of the goals and motives of their political opponents. Let’s agree that the bigger the government, the more money and power it takes from its citizens. So where does this leave us? It takes us back to a founding principle of this country: limited government. By reducing the size of government, we limit the amount of damage “the other side” can do when in charge.
It isn’t that smaller government is more trustworthy or transparent. Among other attributes, a smaller government allows the commander in chief to focus on job one -- that of protecting the American people against enemies. For both Obama-haters and Bush-haters, a smaller government reduces the amount of influence and control the “wrong side” has over the other. A win-win.

http://www.larryelder.com/b/Obama-Demonstrates-the-Evil-of-Big-Government/-134129183532672009.html



Latest Activity: Jun 23, 2013 at 9:17 PM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by Funkentelecky
Send Funkentelecky a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (664) times.

Funkentelecky commented on Monday, Jun 24, 2013 at 19:35 PM

Larry has a great point in the fact that no one trusts the other, so it would seem that we all should agree with limited government so when someone is in power that we disagree with won't be able to do the damage to us as this administration has. I'm not saying all Republicans are saints because GWB grew government too.

PoliticsNation commented on Tuesday, Jun 25, 2013 at 21:43 PM

BREAKING: Democratic Rep. Ed Markey was just elected to the U.S. Senate, defeating Republican Gabriel Gomez to serve the remainder of John Kerry's term. http://nbcnews.to/18eWkAy (AP Photo/Michael Dwyer)


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by Funkentelecky
 
Trump on "Rigged System"
July 13, 2016
Bernie now 'part of the rigged system' he claims to hate Bernie the sell-out hypocrite sells out. Today, Bernie took his campaign out behind the shed, shot it, carved its corpse into steaks, and fed it to Hillary Clinton. For months, and as recently as April, Sanders was wailing about ...
Read More »
 
Trump's 3 Challenges
June 29, 2016
Trump's 3 Challenges: Himself, Media and Republicans After finally getting the endorsement of House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Donald Trump frittered the goodwill away. Trump called a judge born in Indiana a "Mexican." Rather than apologize, Trump, at first, doubled and triple down, ...
Read More »
 
After Orlando
June 23, 2016
The kind of country we want to be It did not take long for President Barack Obama to inject a plea for more gun control in his reaction to the Orlando terror massacre. In his five-minute, no-questions-taken-statement, Obama said: "Today marks the most deadly shooting in American history. The shooter ...
Read More »
 
The Gun Control Farce
June 21, 2016
Surely murder is a serious subject, which ought to be examined seriously. Instead, it is almost always examined politically in the context of gun control controversies, with stock arguments on both sides that have remained the same for decades. And most of those arguments are irrelevant to the central question: ...
Read More »
 
Obama by the numbers
June 15, 2016
The real numbers, that is. “By almost every economic measure — every economic measure, America is better off when I — better off than when I came here. That is the truth. That’s true.” - President Obama June 1, 2016 That's not the first time President Obama has made that ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology