Snack spending in Congress
Last comment by sebekm 1 year, 6 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

RICHMOND, VA (WWBT) -

While the rest of the country was bracing for the fiscal cliff and massive budget cuts, last fall, Congress was spending quite a bit of your money on snacks and bottled water.

12 Investigates dugs into a recently released audit of how Congress is spending your tax dollars in its offices.

In the last three months of 2012, the top congressional leadership spent nearly $30,000 on bottled water, coffee, and catering from restaurants and grocery stores.

The food was bought from upscale grocery stores, including Harris Teeter and Whole Foods, restaurants, like P.F. Chang's, and breakfast food and drink from Joe Ragan's Coffee and Dunkin Donuts.

Speaker of the House John Boehner spent the most - more than $11,000 on food and drink. More than $2,200 was just for coffee in October, November and December.

Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy spent more than $9,000 - including a $2,500 bill at Qdoba in October.

Minority leader Nancy Pelosi came in at $3,500.

Locally, Majority Leader Eric Cantor spent the least among leadership - just under $3,000 on food and drink over three months.

So, while Americans we're being told to prepare for tough budget cuts, the food, water and coffee budgets in Congress were still flowing.

None of the top leadership returned phone calls from several media outlets.

An investigative reporter for WUSA in Washington, D.C. was able to get a hold of Minority Whip Steny Hoyer's office. An aide said the money went towards breakfast meetings and lunch meetings, calling it common.

During those three months of spending, Congress was only in session for 35 days.


Latest Activity: Apr 10, 2013 at 8:31 AM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by mountain
Send mountain a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (422) times.

HMJC commented on Thursday, Apr 11, 2013 at 08:44 AM

Coffee, Tea, Or Me....

sebekm commented on Thursday, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:43 PM

It's not just Congress. That bastion of conservatism - The Weekly Standard - posted an article online about an hour ago which ropes (you guessed it) PRESIDENT OBAMA into the mess. It is short enough to post here in its entirety:

"Obama Now Says He Was Off by $1.6 Trillion — and 43 Percent
11:32 AM, Apr 11, 2013 • By JEFFREY H. ANDERSON

When President Obama released his first budget — entitled with no hint of irony, “A New Era of Responsibility” — he projected that deficit spending over the next five fiscal years (2010-14) would total $3.767 trillion. Now, Obama has released his fifth budget (which doesn’t seem to have a name). In it, he says that deficit spending over that same 5-year span (2010-14) will instead total $5.398 trillion. (This includes three years that are already on the books...) So Obama now admits that his original 5-year projection was off by $1,631,000,000,000.00 — or 43 percent.

It should make Americans feel better that this is the sort of precision we can expect from the president who spearheaded, and whose administration will now be implementing, “probably the most complex piece of legislation ever passed by the United States Congress,” legislation whose complexity “is just beyond comprehension” — Obamacare.

Repeal, anyone?"

See: http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/o...

sebekm commented on Thursday, Apr 11, 2013 at 13:07 PM

You might ask: What does the federal budget have to do with snack spending in Congress? The answer is that they both deal with wasteful spending. And the President's latest budget submission answers ANOTHER question: Why didn't Mr. Obama/the Democrats submit a budget in his first term, and engage in the kind of number scrutiny and debate which triggers articles like Jeffrey Anderson's? Answer: Because it makes the system more "transparent," and it brings out into the light the kind of cost overruns that are illustrated above.

In short - the President didn't want the people to know before the 2012 election that his spending projections were off by 1.6 TRILLION DOLLARS. Why? Because enough of them might have voted against him and put Mitt Romney into the White House.


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by mountain
 
Same Old Same Old
March 28, 2014
I stayed away from this blog for over six months because I was sick and tired of politics just to return to see the same old crap.
Read More »
 
Christmas Trees as Holiday Trees
November 04, 2013
Apparently the White House referred to Christmas Trees as Holiday Trees for the first time this year, which prompted CBS presenter, Ben Stein, to present this piece which I would like to share with you. The following was written by Ben Stein and recited by him on CBS Sunday Morning ...
Read More »
 
SEC
September 30, 2013
Welcome to the new SEC, ladies and gentlemen. The days of kicking a field goal and winning 6-3 in overtime are over. The days of defense wins championships and it all begins up front on the defensive line and we dare you to run on us have been replaced by ...
Read More »
 
Best Obituary Ever Written
September 16, 2013
I hope it's okay for me to post this here because this has to be the best Obituary ever written. I cannot believe the nick names of his girlfriends were allowed in the obituary. William Freddie McCullough - BLOOMINGDALE - The man. The myth. The legend. Men wanted to be ...
Read More »
 
Charlie Daniels
July 02, 2013
I think that if anything exemplifies the overt prejudice and determination of the American media to report only the news that suits their social and political interests and concept of what does and does not fit their agenda, it’s the totally overblown coverage of something Paula Deen said 20 years ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology