
Also send it to Kingston, Chambless and Isackson.
He did indeed speak the truth.
Our news media has for the most part so soundly embraced the progressive slant on things that what is being advocated on the clip stands little chance of happening.
Good post, hope all will take the time to watch it.
I'm all for shooting to shreds the on-coming mass assailant. I just do not believe you do that by passing out more guns.
I WILL go this far tho: A trained fire weapons expert would not be a bad idea to stop or impair the gunning down of innocents. It would require planning, strategic placement, and some MONEY.
The Conservatives, if they are to embrace this horror of mass shootings, must be prepared to spend a few coins on eradicating it from society.
Will they get off of their anal rententive spot regarding public expenditures, or will they come around to a reasoned spending issue?
I do not know.
I'm all for shooting to shreds the on-coming mass assailant. I just do not believe you do that by passing out more guns.
Amendment 2 - Right to Bear Arms. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The 2nd Amendments main purpose is to ensure we are armed in case of tyranny, so it shouldn’t even matter how many arms law abiding citizens have as long as they are registered and citizen can afford it. I am against having AK47’s, Machine Guns and 50 Caliber Weapons. Weapons don’t kill people, crazy people wielding them against unprotected innocents do and we need to stay armed to protect the good guys.
The word shall in legal terms is absolute; the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. (Translation) We are authorized by law to purchase how many weapons we feel we need or want and no one else has the right to tell us otherwise even though they may disagree with my personal preference.
Refer to Roe vs Wade as an example of bearing Arms.
Funky: In this case, I vote for "infringement." Arsenals of weapons and high capacity magazines should only legally be in the hands of those fighting law-BREAKERS and the armed services. Unfortunately, our population-at-large has not demonstrated the responsibility to possess these tools of mass murder. Until we combat ALL the elements of these tragedies, we will continue to see them with greater frequency.
Funky: In this case, I vote for "infringement."
I respect your opinion Chief; it is well intentioned as all government infringements in our free society in Economics, Welfare, Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare, Obamacare, etc, etc, etc.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
What I really love about the constitution is that it is written so that a common man such as I can clearly understand and what causes our society to deteriorate is to not follow the rule of law. A Free State is the people of the US, not the Government and shall not be infringed, “Shall” is absolute so to change the rules you need to change the law first.
Gun Violence -- Let's Shift the Odds in Favor of the Good Guys
The deadliest school massacre on American soil appears to have occurred in Chicago in 1958. A student set fire to the school, killing 92 students and three nuns. And in 1927, in Michigan, a former member of the school board set bombs at three schools, killing 45 (mostly second- to sixth-graders), including the bomber.
Here’s a paragraph from the article listed above by the “Sage from South Central” as you can see when some lunatic wants to commit mass murder he or she will find a way, so infringement of law abiding citizens rights is not the answer. Like Mr. Noir said, his intent is to save 10 or more lives not just 1. Chicago and Washington D.C has the strictest gun laws on the books, they also have the highest murder rates too. Check out Larry Elders full article here and with an open mind to what is really needed to limit the violence, for it cannot be stopped completely no matter how well intentioned the government may be with its infringements.