A Strong Case For The Second Amendment
"I Don't Mind A Parasite. I Object To A Cut-Rate One."
Last comment by Funkentelecky 1 year, 9 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form


I am a gun owner whose career was in the profession of arms. And as unlikely as it may seem to some, I am in favor of enhanced gun control measures. I believe that in addition to a 100% requirement for background checks and an increased focus on the identification and treatment of the mentally ill, something has to be done about the mass murderer's "tools of the trade" - the weapons, ammunition, and magazines which enable the mass murderer to kill and injure a large number of people in a very short period of time. I believe in a comprehensive approach to the problem.

However - my web surfing has discovered the most comprehensive and best-researched case I have seen in favor of "Second Amendment rights." As I know all of us who visit here want to consider both sides of this hot-button issue, I share the article below. (It was published on foxnews.com, which will undoubtedly be attacked by some as reason to disregard it altogether, but facts are facts - no matter where they're published.)

The article is titled: "Why I Am A Newly-Minted Member of NRA" by Wayne Allen Root, who is described by our friends at wikipedia.org as a "politician, entrepreneur, television and radio personality, author and political commentator. He was the 2008 Libertarian Party vice-presidential nominee." Root describes himelf as "Jewish, Ivy League educated (Columbia University, Class of ’83)," which made him a classmate of President Obama.

So here it is - what I think is a strong case FOR the Second Amendment:

"Why I am a newly-minted member of NRA

Over 250,000 Americans have joined the NRA since the Sandy Hook tragedy in December. I am one of them.

Why did all these folks decide to sign up?

Well probably for the same reasons I did. At first glance, I’m not your typical NRA member. I’m Jewish, Ivy League educated (Columbia University, Class of ’83, President Obama’s classmate in fact), and have even been a member of the mainstream media (I started my career as an anchorman and host for CNBC, then called the Financial News Network).

I'm not the world's biggest gun guy. I'm not a collector. Being around guns is not second nature for me.

But I want them to be legal. I want the right to own them. I want the right to protect myself and my family.

I want to protect the Second Amendment.

And I don't want government telling me what to do. And if any of those rights are going to be threatened, then I realized it's time for me to stand up for the NRA.

Here are more common sense reasons why I decided to join the NRA:

First, I believe it’s clear that our politicians have come to all the wrong conclusions. Why would we rush to ban guns, when almost all of our worst mass murders and most of our violent crimes occur in places with the strictest gun control? Why rush to create more “Gun Free Zones” when the Sandy Hook tragedy occurred in a “Gun Free Zone?” This response makes absolutely no sense.

The worst violent crime and murder rates in America occur in places with the strictest gun control already in place: Detroit, Chicago, Cleveland, and Washington, D.C.

Strict gun control clearly does not work. It only disarms the honest, law-abiding citizens, who are left helpless and defenseless. Criminals never have a problem acquiring guns. Therefore gun laws are not only useless, they are dangerous.

But don’t just look at big cities in America. Let’s look across the Atlantic Ocean for the best example. Our friend and ally England has a complete ban on guns. No citizen of the UK can carry a gun. Period. Not a one.

Result? The violent crime rate in the UK is three and a third times higher than it is in America. The FBI reports 386 violent crimes per 100,000 in the USA. The UK Home Office reports 1,361 violent crimes per 100,000 in England.

Gun control may be a failure, but the UK experience proves that outright gun bans are an unmitigated disaster.

But this is nothing new. Leftist, big government, Nanny State politicians always come to the wrong conclusion about most issues.

Groucho Marx said it best:

“Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying all the wrong remedies.”

Former White House chief of staff and current Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel put it differently, “Never let a crisis go to waste.” Our leftist big government politicians are trying to turn a terrible tragedy into a gun crisis. Their solution is to try to demonize and ban guns. But the Newtown tragedy wasn’t a gun problem, it was a mental illness problem.

Thank goodness the American public has more common sense than the politicians and media big shots. A recent Rasmussen poll shows that while 27% think stricter gun control laws are the solution, a dominant 48% believe the answer is more action to treat mental health issues.

It is obvious that many Americans agree that guns do much more than kill (in the wrong hands). More often than not, they save lives and prevent violence.

Here are a few proven facts that are too often missing from the gun debate (Thanks to Gun Owners of America and ZeroHedge.com for these statistics):

Based on a 2000 study, Americans use guns to defend themselves from crime and violence 989,883 times annually. Banning guns would leave about 1,000,000 Americans defenseless from criminals who have no problem acquiring guns illegally.

A nationwide survey reported over a five-year period 3.5% of households had a member who used a gun to protect themselves, their family, or their property. This also adds up to about the same 1,000,000 incidents annually.

Each year about 200,000 women use a gun to defend themselves from a sexual crime or abuse.

The Carter Justice Department found that of more than 32,000 attempted rapes, 32% were actually committed. But when a woman was armed with a gun or knife, only 3% of the attempted rapes were actually successful. More recent studies all point towards a figure of 2.5 million -- that’s the new expert guesstimate of how many times Americans defend themselves from violent criminals each year.

Bottom line: guns save lives.

Now that we’ve polled the citizens, how about we see what the felons have to say:

- A survey of male felons in 11 state prisons across the USA found that 34% had been scared off, wounded or captured by an armed victim of their crime.

- 69% of felons knew other fellow criminals who had been scared off or captured by an armed victim.

- 57% of felons polled agreed that "criminals are more worried about meeting an armed victim than they are about running into the police."

These facts (and many more too voluminous to show here) prove that guns -- in the right hands -- defend citizens, families and children.

Again, guns save lives.

But for me, it’s always been a personal and emotional argument, even more than a factual one. I’m a proud Jewish American. Over six million of my fellow Jews were enslaved, starved, tortured, and then slaughtered by Adolph Hitler. Before it could happen, in 1938, Hitler banned gun ownership for Jews.

The reality is that throughout history, the first thing all tyrants do is disarm the citizens. Then the mass killings begin.

In the end we all have to remember our Second Amendment was not put in place to protect us from criminals and random crime. It was put in place to protect the citizens from government.

Thomas Jefferson put it best: "When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.”

I’ll be glad to give up my guns when the elites in Washington and Hollywood agree to disarm their bodyguards. And when President Obama stops sending his daughters to the exclusive Sidwell Friends School, which has a 9-person armed security force.

For all of these reasons, that's why now more than ever, we need to protect the second amendment. That's why now more than ever, we need the NRA."

See: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/01/15/why-am-newly-minted-member-nra/


Latest Activity: Jan 20, 2013 at 6:03 PM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by sebekm
Send sebekm a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (646) times.

Funkentelecky commented on Sunday, Jan 20, 2013 at 18:54 PM

That’s right Chief; the founders passed the 2nd amendment so we may protect ourselves from tyrants. Those in charge that don’t follow the rule of law. We need armed professional guards protecting our innocent children too.

Its funny how people say don’t watch Fox News; however it would serve them well to do so instead of just watching the snippets from the opinion shows in primetime. I actually watch Ed Schultz, Al Sharpton, Chris Matthews, Lawrence O’Donnell and Rachel Maddow from time to time to get an accurate assessment of their presentations. You can’t just go by the snippets because of the bias on each side and come to an informed conclusion.


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by sebekm
 
Political Potpourri
August 13, 2014
As they say on Bret Baier’s “Special Report” program, “here are a few pickings from the political grapevine”: *It appears that the media is finally beginning to turn and get tough on President Obama. Last week the Washington Post – liberal bastion and investigator of all things Republican – chose ...
Read More »
 
ObamaCare Update
August 13, 2014
In case you missed them – here are a few headlines regarding ObamaCare from earlier this month: *”Barney Frank: They “Just Lied to People” About ObamaCare That’s right – Barney Frank, Democrat and former long-term congressman FINALLY made this admission in a recent interview with the Huffington Post: “The rollout ...
Read More »
 
Want To Have The (Absolute) Last Word……
August 06, 2014
…and have some fun with it? Write your own obituary and make it humorous and self-deprecating. That’s what Kevin McGroarty did. He wrote it when he knew the end was near, and all the newspaper had to do was fill in the date. Here it is: “Obituary Kevin J. McGroarty ...
Read More »
 
One Reason Our “Do Nothing Congress” Does Nothing
August 06, 2014
Much has been said about GOP “obstructionism” – particularly as it relates to President Obama’s liberal agenda. It’s clear that as far as Republicans are concerned, President Obama NEEDS to be obstructed. But little has been said or written about Democrat “obstructionism.” Yes – that definitely exists as well, and ...
Read More »
 
Obama’s “Legislative” Strategy
July 30, 2014
According to our Constitution, the Congress is supposed to MAKE the laws; the President is supposed to “faithfully EXECUTE” the laws, and the Judiciary is supposed to INTERPRET the laws (in a constitutional and legislative context). But now comes our President who believes his oath of office is not to ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology