Role of the Government
by HMJC
Last comment by timeontarget 1 year, 11 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

So...The 64 Million Dollar Question... What should be the role of government in our day to day lives? Ronald Reagan was quoted as saying " Governments Job is Protect the People, not run their Day to Day Lives" Our current times make me feel like we should be "protected" from our government. Currently we are being told that we will have health insurance, we will bear the brunt of the fiscal cliff through taxation, we will allow forgien countries to openly chatise our country and way of life while still receiving money we suppossedly do not have to shore up our own economy. I am sure there will be many different takes on this but I would venture to say that government is too invloved in the day to day life of the citizens it supossedly serves. Government as a whole no longer serves the constituents they were empowered to represent. Everything is a "deal" for the greater good. It is overcompromising and no longer possesses the ability to assign accountability. It is going to take a country to fix this. Thoughts


Latest Activity: Dec 13, 2012 at 4:25 PM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by HMJC
Send HMJC a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (470) times.

timeontarget commented on Thursday, Dec 13, 2012 at 16:51 PM

Government serves

Government also rules and meddles in our affairs.

In the last few decades there has been an ever increasing amount of ruling and meddeling and a continuing decline of worthwhile service.

JimmyMack commented on Friday, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:02 PM

Thoughts: locally I am personally very disappointed in Jason Floyd. A card carrying fical conservative Republican whom I voted for in the last election. Even put one of his signs in my yard. I thought he would stick to his pedigree and fight against more taxes. Yet I see in todays Courier that he would have sided with those councilmen and the Mayor in voting to raise them!!!!

The two dissenting votes were from Democrats, Keith Jenkins and Kenneth Shaw!!!

I just don't get it!?? Jason was supposed to be a breath of fresh air. Or so I thought.

We Hinesville tax-payers are in voter hell. We cannot win, it seems, no matter the party or person we vote to represent us.

HMJC commented on Friday, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:49 PM

This was kind of the point I was trying to solicit. We vote and PAY people to represent us and after the ball drops; here come the taxes. This is serious on a local, state, and national level. The current taxation combined with the projected rise in taxes is devestating the individuals that actually pay taxes. There in lies a majority of the problem. Taxes are not being expanded to affect all, it is passing on further tax burdon to try to finance previous failed policies. It does not seem that the government is searching for ways for all to do their fair share. Its frustrating to say the least as any gains I have received finacially have been taxed at a higher rate. I worked for that, it was not given to me. My reward, and ineffective government and more taxes.

timeontarget commented on Friday, Dec 14, 2012 at 15:39 PM

Did the two councilemen who voted no vote to approve the budget???

Can you approve a budget without raising the millage?

timeontarget commented on Friday, Dec 14, 2012 at 18:51 PM

I believe the short answer is yes to the first question.

I don't think any answer is yes to the second question.

Let's think about it.

timeontarget commented on Saturday, Dec 15, 2012 at 05:25 AM

I'm not sure but I think by law the city like the State is required to have a balanced budget.

If that is the case anyone who approved the budget therefore approved the tax increase.

The two Democrats who disapproved the tax increase after having approved the budget are simply grandstanding.

That is if they in fact had voted their approval of the budget.

I think Kenny Shaw has been seen doing this little bit of fakery in the past.

Also I think that the Mayor and Council are non-partisan.

Just thoughts.

timeontarget commented on Saturday, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:11 PM

I agree that it is better to have a balanced budget law than not.

If you voted to approve the budget you are the culpret who caused the tax increase.

The vote on raising the millage is simply to facilitate the budget.

Any council person who voted against raising the millage is a clown who does not understand how the government he is supposed to be managing is operated.

timeontarget commented on Saturday, Dec 15, 2012 at 15:05 PM

I think we all need to get better acquainted with how the millage rate is determined.

sebe I have to differ with you on this.

Research the process for determining the millage rate.

JimmyMack commented on Saturday, Dec 15, 2012 at 15:17 PM

AMAZING!! TOT advising Sebe 'to research the process.'

TOT: it is NOT Sebe that is in need of advice. He does his homework.

It is you TOT whom is in need. But it is not ADVICE that you need. No sirree Bob. You, TOT, need to be caged and studied.

timeontarget commented on Sunday, Dec 16, 2012 at 08:20 AM

Thanks, I believe we are making some progress.

"but you still have to determine your requirements and then find ways to pay for them."

If an item is put into the budget and approved is there any other way to fund it besides imposing a tax on the citizens?

timeontarget commented on Sunday, Dec 16, 2012 at 08:31 AM

I know it is simple mindedness on my part but the way it appears to me is as follows.

If the council approves something in the budget and it is adopted it will trigger a tax increase if there are no other sources of revenue.

For a member of the council to approve a budget and then vote against the acceptance of the funds to support it that council person is simply grandstanding.

Such was the case with the two councilmen who voted against the raising of the millage.

timeontarget commented on Monday, Dec 17, 2012 at 06:51 AM

Thanks again.

Still tho if they voted to approve the entire budget they therefore approved the raising of the millage.

Because they by law (I think) are required to have a balanced budget.

They could have helped to balance it by voting to roll back their salaries to the previous amounts.

I'll bet that the two Democrats who voted no on the millage have been accepting their monthly paychecks.


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by HMJC
 
GOP Has to make opportunity count
November 17, 2014
The GOP is at a crucial crossroads right now. America has made it pretty clear how much faith it had in the current status quo. Even though I have always leaned towards the GOP side of the house this does negate the expectations I personally have for them. The GOP ...
Read More »
 
ISIL, The Next 10 Year War
November 04, 2014
As election day comes and goes our Commander and Chump is quietly drawing us deeper and deeper into the ISIL debacle. I had blogged previously about the ineffectiveness of the current effort. Utilizing air strikes has been completely ineffective to date. The reason this is a flawed response is the ...
Read More »
 
"Greater Good"
October 28, 2014
“Greater Good”, a point or ideology that has been defined, perceived, twisted, etc. So what does this mean? Is it fair to even apply this concept as at the end of the day whatever the definition is construed; Man is still making that determination. So now here we are with ...
Read More »
 
Crossroads
October 15, 2014
After pursing the “headlines” for the last couple of days it seems painfully apparent to me that our nation is at a perilous crossroad. We are mired in such discord that your average Dooms Day Prepper is doing jumping jacks saying “I told You So….” I try to do my ...
Read More »
 
ISIS Endstate
October 08, 2014
Am I the only one that is concerned with the ineffective air campaign against ISIS? We seem to be going down the same road we did with Libya in regard to airstrikes that destabilize the region and disrupt the “enemy” but bring no semblance of peace and stability. Libya is ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology