How 'Bout Dem Dawgs?
"I Don't Mind A Parasite. I Object To A Cut-Rate One."
Last comment by Graeme245 2 years, 3 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form


No, not UGA - but here's an item of iterest from today's print Courier, byline - The Associated Press;

"Owners of dangerous dogs to face new penalties

ATLANTA - Georgians who own dogs that are deemed dangerous will soon face penalties if their animals injure people under a bill recently signed into law.

Gov. Nathan Deal on Thursday signed House Bill 685, which provides definitions and hearing procedures for determining whether a dog is dangerous or vicious.

The Atlanta-Journal Constitution reports that the bill defines procedures for handling and keeping such animals, including muzzling and requiring a secure enclosure. If a dog has been defined as vicious, the owner must carry $50,000 in insurance and the dog must have a microchip.

A dog owner could face at least a year in prison and at least a $5,000 fine if the dog injures someone on a second occasion."

See: http://www.ajc.com/opinion/dog-bill-step-in-1427366.html


Latest Activity: May 06, 2012 at 2:45 PM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by sebekm
Send sebekm a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (542) times.

JimmyMack commented on Sunday, May 06, 2012 at 14:54 PM

These dog attacks have gotten a lot of press lately and well they should. An animal is an animal and every owner of one is not Ceasar Milan. I think we do need requlations and steps put in place to protect humans from canines deemed dangerous. So...I thinks I agrees wid my guvnah on this one. Bankrupt, pandering to the people during an election year, fool that he is. Sorry Sebe...got off topic a little bit...been watching too much Meet The Press, Face the Nation, FNC, CNN. Turning the channel to basketball now.

sebekm commented on Sunday, May 06, 2012 at 15:02 PM

Good panel on Face the Nation this a.m. I like The McLaughlin Group, too - so much so that I watch it twice on Sundays on GA and SC Public Broadcasting.

Speaking of basketball - it looks like my Chicago team is going to tank after losing their "mvp" and that center from FL. Oh, well - it wouldn't have been much of a series against Miami anyway. It will be interesting to see whether the South Beach Dynasty begins this year (or not).

LibertyDrum commented on Tuesday, May 08, 2012 at 14:16 PM

Wait, am I reading this incorrectly? Does the dog have to attack someone first before a fine is imposed? Or does the courts just have to deam the animal "dangerous or vicious" than a fine will follow? I assume it's NOT the later, correct?

sebekm commented on Tuesday, May 08, 2012 at 14:48 PM

Yes - from the AJC piece:

"A dangerous dog is one that causes a substantial puncture wound to a person, or aggressively attacks and poses an imminent threat of serious injury to a person, or while off the owner’s property kills a pet. Once classified, a dangerous dog cannot be off the owner’s property unless it’s under the physical control of a person who can prevent, when necessary, the dog from engaging any other human or animal, or is in a locked cage or crate. Some exemptions were made for working, hunting and predator control dogs."

and

"A vicious dog is one that seriously injures or kills a person. In some cases, a judge can order euthanasia for a vicious dog. A vicious dog cannot be off the owner’s property unless he is muzzled and under the physical control of a person capable of preventing the dog from engaging any other human or animal when necessary, or is in a locked cage or crate. The owner must maintain a minimum of $50,000 in insurance. No person may own more than one vicious dog, and no person convicted of certain felonies may own a vicious dog."

So first - under the new law - there has to be an incident or incidents which result in the "classification" of a dog as dangerous or vicious. It's my understanding from reading the article that only after classification do the fines/penalties kick in.

So apparently for the "first offense/offenses" prior to classification, the new law doesn't apply.

LibertyDrum commented on Wednesday, May 09, 2012 at 19:43 PM

Oh ok, makes sense, I suppose. Thanks Seb.

Graeme245 commented on Monday, May 28, 2012 at 10:09 AM

Georgia state law does NOT allow for (what some people had hoped for) Breed Specific Legislation BSL. BSL says that only dogs of certain breeds are capable of inflicting injurious bites which is patentedly untrue.

The bill that the govenernor signed though not perfect is a starting point to some & a slippery slope to others, the hard part is that most if not all dog owners best acquire a minimun of $100,000.00 of "dog bite public liability" and not allow anyone under the age of 18 to walk or care for their dogs to be in compliance with the law.

To paraphrase LBJ; never examine new legislation for its perceived benefits but rather for it's for potential for abuse...

sebekm commented on Monday, May 28, 2012 at 10:45 AM

That is so true. It's amazing how our society has "progressed" over the years. I never heard of "dog bite insurance" when I was growing up.

Graeme245 commented on Monday, May 28, 2012 at 15:18 PM

I'm employed by a couple of lobbyists that haunt the halls & corridors of Atlanta & Washington doing research into certain "specific" areas of the law. The original bill proposed & what was signed are 2 different animals, if the original bill had become law shelter populations would have gone through the roof overnight.

We (and I mean the collective we)currently have USDA proposed rule changes that will have such long reaching effects on the acquiring of pets from shelters, rescues, pet stores & breeders that 4th & 14th amendment questions are already being drawn up.

You've gotta love big government and those who wish to grow it bigger ;)


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by sebekm
 
Political Potpourri
August 13, 2014
As they say on Bret Baier’s “Special Report” program, “here are a few pickings from the political grapevine”: *It appears that the media is finally beginning to turn and get tough on President Obama. Last week the Washington Post – liberal bastion and investigator of all things Republican – chose ...
Read More »
 
ObamaCare Update
August 13, 2014
In case you missed them – here are a few headlines regarding ObamaCare from earlier this month: *”Barney Frank: They “Just Lied to People” About ObamaCare That’s right – Barney Frank, Democrat and former long-term congressman FINALLY made this admission in a recent interview with the Huffington Post: “The rollout ...
Read More »
 
Want To Have The (Absolute) Last Word……
August 06, 2014
…and have some fun with it? Write your own obituary and make it humorous and self-deprecating. That’s what Kevin McGroarty did. He wrote it when he knew the end was near, and all the newspaper had to do was fill in the date. Here it is: “Obituary Kevin J. McGroarty ...
Read More »
 
One Reason Our “Do Nothing Congress” Does Nothing
August 06, 2014
Much has been said about GOP “obstructionism” – particularly as it relates to President Obama’s liberal agenda. It’s clear that as far as Republicans are concerned, President Obama NEEDS to be obstructed. But little has been said or written about Democrat “obstructionism.” Yes – that definitely exists as well, and ...
Read More »
 
Obama’s “Legislative” Strategy
July 30, 2014
According to our Constitution, the Congress is supposed to MAKE the laws; the President is supposed to “faithfully EXECUTE” the laws, and the Judiciary is supposed to INTERPRET the laws (in a constitutional and legislative context). But now comes our President who believes his oath of office is not to ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology