[Report Abuse]
[Login to Blog] LibertyDrum's Blog
Health Care Mandates vs Pizza Toppings
Every sort of chauvinism is mistaken
Last comment by LibertyDrum 2 years, 7 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form


Ever wonder why health insurance cost so much?

Watch the clip below;

"Internet sensation Remy explains how pizza can tell us a lot about health care mandates." About 2.30 minutes.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Cdfn0Wiywk4


Latest Activity: Apr 02, 2012 at 1:36 PM


Bookmark and Share
Forward This Blog
Print Blog
More Blogs by LibertyDrum
Send LibertyDrum a Message
Report Abuse


Blog has been viewed (610) times.

LibertyDrum commented on Monday, Apr 02, 2012 at 15:27 PM

Seb, you provided the point which I was hoping someone would make. It's the argument that political elites need to be in charge of what you pay for.
If the decision of what to pay for, in terms of health care, aren’t made by the consumer (the ones PAYING for it) than the question is WHO?
Who, rather than the one flipping the bill, should decide what is to be paid for?
If not the consumer, it's the State which is to determine FOR US, by way of studies, what we should/should not be taking.
Of course, we all know, scientific studies are infallible of being slanted to favor a specific outcome.

However, as we've just seen, in an effort to mandate that everyone be “cut from the same cloth”, we end up with people paying for procedures they will NEVER use in their lifetime. I, for one, don’t find that fair.

If the answer to that is "dem's the breaks," well, I'll argue we are no better than any totalitarian regime.

Even Mussolini said any disagreement from the all powerful political elite’s decision was against the state.

"All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state."

I assume that I would be a deviant since my decision to use my income as I see fit as "against the state."

LibertyDrum commented on Monday, Apr 02, 2012 at 19:08 PM

Who do you feel has the most vested interest in health care decisions?

The individual or the Gov't ?

LibertyDrum commented on Tuesday, Apr 03, 2012 at 14:17 PM

\The problem here arises in that only ONE decision can be made. When you allow the Gov't to have a "hand in the decisions" the individuals whose decision deviates from this is pushed to the way side.

This is the fallacy of Govt's proper maintenance and "improvement" in a system. It's a one size fits all approach, and not everyone fits into this category.

Rather I would advocate a more market-orientated approach that allowed people to buy the insurance they want, with the company they choose.

This would weed out the bad companies and leave only the ones that served the people the best insurance at the price they wanted. Simply the power of competition, which works in every other industry.

But we've drifted off the topic (mainly my fault).

Do you disagree with the main thesis of the video that; the cost of insurance rises from each marginal expenditure the company legally must provide?

There by transferring these mandated expenses to the consumer, as a whole?

LibertyDrum commented on Wednesday, Apr 04, 2012 at 07:59 AM

Sorry, you are correct. I did write that sentence incorrectly.

The essence of what I was saying is this;

Specifically speaking of health insurance costs and their long-term benefits, I feel the person whose life is at stake has the MOST vested interests into how it's carried out (co-pays, benefits, choice of Dr., etc).

Also, that if we continue to advocate a system where the person with the most vested interests DOESN'T have the final say over their own body, than who? In this case, it's the political officials.

We perpetuate a system where, Rand Paul, Bernie Sanders, Barbara A. Mikulski, Johnny Isakson (etc, etc) somehow know what you need, better than you and your doctor.

I, for one, will never agree with that.

To your last point, I will continue to vote for officials that favor choices that give more rights to people and less to the officials themselves. Because I reject the "Love 'em or leave 'em" premise. There is a third option, change 'em.

Still, thanks for discussing this with me Seb. It’s too bad we couldn’t get more input from others. C'est la vie – See you on the next blog!


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by LibertyDrum
 
Friday Funnies
May 04, 2012
Friday Funnies
Read More »
 
Nanny of the Month - April 2012
May 01, 2012
As I try to post these every first of the month, we have the Nanny of the Month for April 2012. I'm (not so) glad to say, our Gov. N. Deal is one of the runner-ups. However, he did not "win." Which I suppose is a good thing. Alas... Nanny ...
Read More »
 
Five reasons why a Romney loss might be great news
May 01, 2012
It's with mixed emotions that I post this interesting article. I, for one, can't see myself voting for Romney. However, I do understand the conservative stand point of "anyone but Obama." That voting for anyone BUT Romney, in effect, is a vote for Obama. I understand that, and am sympathetic. ...
Read More »
 
Anti-Bullying Speaker Curses Christian Teens
April 28, 2012
"Anti-Bullying" activist bullys audience. Ironic. "As many as 100 high school students walked out of a national journalism conference after an anti-bullying speaker began cursing, attacked the Bible and reportedly called those who refused to listen to his rant “pansy assed.” The speaker was Dan Savage, founder of the “It ...
Read More »
 
Friday Funnies
April 20, 2012
Friday Funnies
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology