There is a reason that you were personally anointed by me as Chief MVB, (Most Valuable Blogger) because you are a TRUE PATRIOT and not a blind ideologue, thank you for your service to this country and thank you for your service to this cyber bathroom wall, said JimmyMack!
Chief MVB, clearly presented demagoguery and hate spewed from the left, and the COWARDS RESPONSE IS MORE OF THE SAME; instead of acknowledging the factual differences, November 6th 2012. ABO! Fire the Progressive.
As Funk respectively asked Murrelet to get off of Mothers... this is her last stand before Funk Transform into DOZENS MODE, sai Windell.
As a Christian, I'm giving you a legitimate warning to respect my honest request to leave my mother out of this, because you know nothing 0% actually about her; however you do about me, so I welcome your attacks on me, but if you can't acknowledege my request regarding mothers, may God have mercy on your sinful, cowardly and disrespectful, soul!
Chief MVB, did you know about BHO's support of Infanticide?
See it here, with his voting record too.
Funk, I have a list of people that have been complaining to the Long County Sheriff's Dept about the loud music in Murr'e area all the way back from 3 years ago.
Would like to see the list and track her down?
It's called the Public Open Records Act you MORON.
How do you think 911 calls are published and played on the news on TV?
911 calls are played back on the news all the time so I have no idea where you have been hiding.
PS I am my own BOSS. I work for me. I have my own business. I will be expanding my business later this year and I may need a new Janitor if interested.
Murrelet, I see you have a lot of experience in cesspools since you are stuck in one. I believe you will be perfect for the job, you could be my new roto rooter man.
See Murrelet it is so easy to control you.
You are like a puppet on a string.
If I was worried about my job I would stop blogging now wouldn't I Smurrelet?
She's obviously very concerned about anyone pulling back the curtain of her anonymity. She must be very fearful of repercussions
"TOT, what he fails to mention is that:
1) at least two of the people mentioned in the article apologized--and not because sponsors were pulling their support."
If I "failed" to mention any apologies, then you did, too, in your diatribes against Limburger and Breitbart. They have "apologized" numerous times for their comments - but all IMHO are just as worthless as any apologies by the lefties.
(Actually, if you would bother to read the entire basic blog post you would find that an apology was mentioned by Kirsten Powers).
Apologies aren't the point. MYSOGYNIST STATEMENTS ARE. I would have thought with your education you would have realized that.
"Sebekm himself engages in the "nuts or sluts" tactic himself and so hardly sees what's wrong with it."
Apparently I only engage in it and direct it toward you, right?
Well - if you want apology, here's mine:
I'm sorry, but I don't consider an honest opinion a "tactic."
You need help. IMHO, you are a bipolar pathological insulter with a severe inferiority complex. The WHOLE WORLD (or at least the entire community here) can see it. You are the only one who apparently can't.
I've done a little fact finding, and it seems the young law student, Sandra Fluke, has more going on that we were let to believe. Please read the articles and see for yourself.
Sandra Fluke: ‘I would encourage everyone to go to Media Matters’
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/05/san...
IS SANDRA FLUKE COORDINATING WITH THE WHITE HOUSE?
The Feds? Really? Don't forget to turn your porch light on and off twice before you go to bed so they know you're OK. Definately going with the nuts tactic. Get back on your meds ASAP!
Never thought I would be in this position...but here goes nothing. I have been the object of Murrs bashing. She is quite good at it. I, in turn, have traded barbs with her. It's called free speech people and if it gets toooooo free speaking for ya...butt the hell out. Some people like Kitchens, I know I do. Some can't take the heat.
We are NOT in Church here folks. You want peace and harmony and good will (pretended or real? We got a couple hundred places of civility and worship sites to pick from in this area and you can pick some of that up there.
As one of my blogging friends once stated here before, and I paraphrase, "if you are looking for peace, harmony and good will..." you won't find it here.
To my thin skinned bloggers I say: tough cookies!!!!
...and I've made the point before that "free speech" is NOT the ability to say anything you want whenever you want to whomever you want for whatever reason. Just as screaming "fire" in a crowded theater is excluded, so is language (on this site supposedly) which is "abusive,"bullying," and "harassing" to other bloggers.
When abuse, bullying, and harassment become the purpose of a blog string itself - IMHO - you are beyond the protection of "free speech." When the blog string becomes an opportunity for a bully to relentlessly insult and pound on somebody just "because they can," I believe in a controlled environment (by the Courier), that behavior should be curtailed.
This blog site is not SUPPOSED to be for people to bash each other - it is supposed to be for the free and unfettered exchange of IDEAS and dialogue. When that dialogue consists only of abuse, it becomes a cancer.
Yes - I did say your quote above in one of my earlier, more fatalistic moments. But I've been here going on three years now (I think), and my gauge of Murrelet's activity on this site is to provoke hostility so she can level insults. Other than a few, streaky, bipolar posts at other times, that's it.
The other people who want to engage in dialogue here don't deserve that. Who knows how many people she has run off with her insults? I would think the Courier would be interested in THAT - along with ATTEMPTING to maintain peace, harmony, and good will - in even the slightest form - on THEIR web site.
There's only ONE egregious violator of their policy that I see here. I intend to point it out to the Courier.
Ok Sebe. I guess it is now in the web-meister's hands. Are you setting a time limit on his response? I got kicked out pretty quick before my repentence.
I'm going to wait for at least 24 hours to see how many "yes votes" (different people) appear on the other blog. Then I'll send along my request, which I'll spend time crafting today.
I know the Courier staff and webmeister spot-check this blog community periodically, so by the end of the day they should be aware of what's coming.
Ok man. But, remember: Al Gore WON the popular vote in Y2K.
This is just a hunch, and like my Super Bowl Bets, I could be wrong on this and I haven't talked to IKY about any odds or anything but...I'm a gonna bet...Murr makes the cut. That doesn't mean I love the woman (she reported me to the FBI you know a while back) but she ain't kilt nobody here...yet. And, I know you are aware that some humans keep 'pet' rattlesnakes as well as pit bulls, chi-hau-haus, kitty kitties, and Tigers.
I know, I know. But after putting up with what is tantamount to her "slime spamming" this site for years, I am inspired to do SOMETHING. If it doesn't work - as I said - c'est la vie. Believe it or not - my objective is not to get her kicked off the site, but I'm not sure anything short of that will make any difference. I could be wrong.....
It does seem tough to have an mature conversation without the perpetual pother.
May I suggest one YouTube clip that comes to mind when I see the same cut&paste post over and over again.
Hi LD...I got to go look up pother......OK!...got it. Had not used it myself before. Good word. Danka. After viewing the clip it brings to mind that both sides, if we are talking right and left here, have their fair share of those that pother.
Some, like Limburger, even profit at pothering.
I still advocate shunning or ostracizing as practiced by the Amish for those bothered by Murr or whomever's perpetual pothering. You know, kinda like what's happening with the Nazi Gas Bag Limbaugh right now.
Exactly. That guy's whole purpose was to "shout down" and SHUT DOWN any real discourse on the topic. So should that be the goal or end result of a blog site "community?" Obviously - just as in real life - people aren't always going to get along, but when the bashing becomes all-consuming and the actual focus of the dialogue, then I think it's the wrong answer.
We ought to be able to disagree without calling each other various forms of a maternal fornicator, or be subjected to continuous and repeated insults just because it makes somebody feel good to do so. That's all I'm saying.
"I still advocate shunning or ostracizing as practiced by the Amish for those bothered by Murr or whomever's perpetual pothering."
Doesn't work. If you review the entire body of evidence, you really do see a bipolar effect at work, where there are brief stretches of civil discourse, inevitably (so far) followed by lengthy "target practice" with demeaning insults. It's human nature to "defend yourself," so people feel compelled to respond. When you don't, then comes further insults of "coward," "boy," and (in the case of males), comments directed at questioning manhood; and other women are "stupid cows."
No - doesn't/hasn't worked up until now.
Winston Churchill upon being confronted by an English Lady of Title, was accosted by her admonishment to Sir Winston at some fancy British gathering with the admonisment to Churchill: Sir Churchill, you are dastardly drunk. To which the former Prime Minster replied: "of course you are correct, Madame. But, you are incredibly ugly. However, by tomorrow I will be indubitably sober."
Insults have their places.
Yes, Jimmy....but according to this site's rules of use, "abuse, harassment, and bullying" DO NOT have a place here. For years, it has been instigated almost exclusively by this one blogger.
I believe that it's now time for a change.
I understand Sebe and you have documented your opinion very well indeed. I think we all are now waiting for the ball to drop or not.